» Thu May 03, 2012 5:03 pm
What I don't like about New Vegas is the idea of basic goodness and nobility inherent in their humanity. Here you have this civilization of people helping each other. Why? In Fallout 1 I never got the impression that Fallout people were so worthy of having my heart bleed for them. They were mostly trash, scumbags, drunks, druggies, goons, bums, and there was very little good to be seen in someone. And when there was that one odd fellow who seemed lawful ( Richard Dean Anderson ) then there was always the open door question of what they get out of their role to quench their selfish egos. Credit.
Who am I talking about that I can't stand? The NCR, the Children of the Apocolypse and that Julie Farkas, that sickening Dr. Usanagi and that contemptuous Dr. Keeley. And almost everyone in towns seemed too sane and healthy-minded, whereas Fallout 1 had something looney to be found in everybody. The people of Fallout don't deserve to have healing, and that is what I don't like about New Vegas. Fallout 3, however, presented some good examples of the kind of people that blow up their own planet. Republic of Dave, Greyditch, Andale. That is what the survivors of Fallout deserve. Not hope.