If you believe the author of "The Bear of Markarth." You ask me, it was way too extremely rife with Imperial propoganda to be used as a credible source.
And historically, the people of the Reach, specificially the now Foresworn, have been nothing but a giant pain on everyone's ass, going as far back as them being there. I dunno, but there's something in the water of the Reach that causes bretons to go [censored] insane.
And historically, the people of the Reach, specificially the now Foresworn, have been nothing but a giant pain on everyone's ass, going as far back as them being there. I dunno, but there's something in the water of the Reach that causes bretons to go [censored] insane.
I'm not so quick to dismiss the account of "The Bear of Markarth" for pure imperial propaganda when the same author wrote "The "Madmen" of the Reach".
And "propaganda" of "what" isn't exactly clear if "The Bear of Markarth" was published right after the Markarth incident, well before the stormcloak rebellion has taken root. Then the account could simply be taken as an attack to Ulfric's alleged handling of the retaking of Markarth which by all means, according to the account, is very morally repulsive. And justifies the aggressive tone the author is using to express his opinion of the incident.