Questionable 50's style for FNV?

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 4:43 am

I was wondering, considering the bombs were dropped in the late 2000's Then why does this game have a 50's style? It's not like they didn't live through drum and base, dub step etc. And why is most of the items found in the game less futuristic? Of course there's power armour and energy weapons but things such as the old style cameras? And the computers? Even jukeboxes?

I don't want this to sound like a rant but I just don't understand why it's like technology was sent back 100 years. :brokencomputer:
User avatar
Alexandra walker
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 2:50 am

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:07 pm

The Fallout universe split off from ours in the 50s and cuturally plateaued at a fifties mindset.

Or another way off putting it. The Fallout universe is the future as people from the fifties imagined it. Hence lasers, robot butlers, nuclear power cars (See Ford Nucleon). Thats also why the emphasise on fighting Communism.
User avatar
roxanna matoorah
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 6:01 am

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:19 am

I was wondering, considering the bombs were dropped in the late 2000's Then why does this game have a 50's style? It's not like they didn't live through drum and base, dub step etc. And why is most of the items found in the game less futuristic? Of course there's power armour and energy weapons but things such as the old style cameras? And the computers? Even jukeboxes?

I don't want this to sound like a rant but I just don't understand why it's like technology was sent back 100 years. :brokencomputer:

its called retro futuristic..... its retro style... but still in the future.... like what the people in the 50s thought the world would be like in 2070 http://www.animationarchive.org/pics/50sfuture.jpg http://www.animationarchive.org/pics/venus29-big.jpg http://www.animationarchive.org/pics/venus02-big.jpg
User avatar
Connor Wing
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:22 am

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 4:12 pm

I was wondering, considering the bombs were dropped in the late 2000's Then why does this game have a 50's style? It's not like they didn't live through drum and base, dub step etc. And why is most of the items found in the game less futuristic? Of course there's power armour and energy weapons but things such as the old style cameras? And the computers? Even jukeboxes?

I don't want this to sound like a rant but I just don't understand why it's like technology was sent back 100 years. :brokencomputer:

The time line diverged in the 40s or 50s and while some new technologies were developed that the real world doesn't have (particularly in terms of energy output) other technologies weren't developed which is why some technology is very 'dated.'
User avatar
Sandeep Khatkar
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:02 am

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 2:19 pm

Right, thanks for clearing that up :user:
User avatar
Soph
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:24 am

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:16 am

It's like that because it's just awesome.
User avatar
josh evans
 
Posts: 3471
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 1:37 am

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:33 pm

I like the fact that Fallout has a 50's theme, it adds more character to the game imo. :)
User avatar
gary lee
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:49 pm

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:27 pm

Seriously. Does anybody read their instruction manuals these days? Hell, even just glance at them?

This stuff's all explained on page 3 of your Fallout 3 manual, under the heading "Introduction to Fallout 3"
User avatar
Philip Lyon
 
Posts: 3297
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:08 am

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 8:50 am

Seriously. Does anybody read their instruction manuals these days? Hell, even just glance at them?


I do. But I've been convinced that makes me part of a very, very tiny minority for more than a decade.
User avatar
Rob
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 12:26 am

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:16 am

I do. But I've been convinced that makes me part of a very, very tiny minority for more than a decade.


Kids these days. :shakehead:
User avatar
Adrian Powers
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:44 pm

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 6:41 am

I read them.
User avatar
Emma Copeland
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 12:37 am

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:54 am

If fallout wasn't 50s it would loose my appeal
User avatar
Alex [AK]
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 10:01 pm

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 4:53 am

I mostly read the random Vault-Tec messages in my manual, but I was able to get the retro-future thing on my own.
User avatar
MatthewJontully
 
Posts: 3517
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:33 am

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:10 am

On a grander scale to this retro future stuff there are (very) old pen and paper games that combine the trapping of the past with the wonders of the future. Traveller is renaissance class system with blasters and spaceships. Same can be said for Battletech. Centurion is a galaxy wide setting in which the most powerful government is styled after the roman empire. Hellios of course is alien and lasers in a greek motif.

For another computer game, anyone remember Wizardry 8? A world of both both medival monsters and magic plus aliens and weird technology. There's also the pnp and electronic versions of Shadowrun combining retro fantasy and near future science.

Any other retro science examples?
User avatar
Brιonα Renae
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 3:10 am

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 4:00 pm

I do. But I've been convinced that makes me part of a very, very tiny minority for more than a decade.



Kids these days. :shakehead:


I happen to work at an electronics store, and honestly it isn't the kids that don't read the manuals it's usual the people over 35 that go "oh, there's a manual" to which I reply in my head with "yes. see this booklet thingy that has INSTRUCTION MANUAL written on the front of it?" or "anyone can read a manual" to which I reply in my head with "yes. anyone can read a manual, that is their intended purpose so you can understand how to USE the item without WASTING my time..."

I usually read the manual to get a brief overview of the game, it isn't that hard for a person to skim read over it. So please for the sanity of your local electronics store guru READ THE FREAKING MANUAL BEFORE YOU ASK STUPID QUESTIONS!!!! sorry... I'll be quiet now
User avatar
Lewis Morel
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:40 pm

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 4:15 am

... like what the people in the 50s thought the world would be like in 2070


Other than the developers comments, where is this written or stated? Or is it just common canon? I mean, a childrens Toy from the 50s or pictures without a context are not really saying that people in the 50s imagined a dystopian postnuclear World of Tomorrow = the Fallout Universe.

Imagine someone would create a postnuclear universe for a computer game in 2060. This would be based on the 2010 sources, in this case our childrens toys or our contemporary picture or the future.

- in 1950, a predominant sci-fi picture was Mr. Handy, Robby the Robot or the Ford Nucleon.
- in 2010, a predominant sci-fi picture is ??? (really don't know what to put in here), this microsoft mini robot or cyborg dogs from China and solar-energy driven Cars?
User avatar
Katey Meyer
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 10:14 pm

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 7:10 pm

Other than the developers comments, where is this written or stated? Or is it just common canon? I mean, a childrens Toy from the 50s or pictures without a context are not really saying that people in the 50s imagined a dystopian postnuclear World of Tomorrow = the Fallout Universe.

Honestly, I don't remember anything being specifically explained in the Fallout 1 or 2 game manuals. Back then, I think we just kind of put two and two together. :shrug:

I mean, you take the retro-sounding opening song, all the vacuum tubes and other retro trappings, and then combine that with more futuristic things like Plasma Rifles and Power Armor, and the rough timeline you were given - and it just kind of coalesced eventually, as I remember it. To my recollection (and memories can be wrong, of course) it was a more intuitive connection than anything else. You just kind of accepted it and moved on.

Personally, I don't think it's the sort of thing where you're really supposed to over-think it, either. All this talk of "divergence" and such - I don't think the game was necessarily designed, originally, with much more thought than "how do we intuitively drive home the concept of an idealized future world that was then obliterated in a nuclear holocaust?" (Though, obviously, not being a developer on the original games, I could very well be entirely wrong.) Going into "why did culture remain stagnant for 120 years," or "what cultural revolutions and divergences led to society coming full-circle in 2077 and appearing as an idealized version of 1950's futurism" is kind of missing the point, I feel.

(My thoughts, anyway :shrug:)
User avatar
Lifee Mccaslin
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:03 am

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:17 pm


- in 1950, a predominant sci-fi picture was Mr. Handy, Robby the Robot or the Ford Nucleon.
- in 2010, a predominant sci-fi picture is ??? (really don't know what to put in here), this microsoft mini robot or cyborg dogs from China and solar-energy driven Cars?

I'd say the predominant picture of the future today is space faring civilisation that knows no limits, thats solved all the problems of our world, or a dark, world whith corporations that have run amok.
User avatar
Rob Smith
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:30 pm


Return to Fallout Series Discussion