Guns in TES 5?

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 7:51 am

Could be cool, if done properly. As in, Renaissance-style firearms, and obviously not 'guns' as we know them. (And it would have to be something that had 'always been there', not some kind of 'kerazy new invention', in which case it would be lame.)

Think of the first firearm options in games like Medieval 2 Total War, more noisy and scary than actually precision projectile.


It would add to the unique feel of TES, and help keep away from the 'medieval Europe' generica of TES IV.

All I'm sayin' is, if Morrowind can have goggles, Skyrim can have primitive 'firearms'. Just adds to the sense of a lack of 'parallel history' which is too easy to fall into otherwise.

Hmm...

From the view point of the happen in Oblivion, "Renaissance" isn't the word I would think is going to happen after the Oblivion Crisis. "Dark Age" sound alot more better, as the Empire itself is not really in a balance as to that the Emperor dead and the whole invasion. And in a nutshell, it wasn't always there.

The unique feel can exist, but I do not think it need guns for that. It need better handling of how the game is made.

Morrowind having Goggles is not really a good comparison for the existence of Skyrim having firearm. Its like saying Morrowind have spear, and because of that, Oblivion have Swords.
User avatar
Neko Jenny
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:29 am

Post » Thu May 26, 2011 7:43 pm

Forgive me my second of nitpicking, but I would call it a lore-based hypothesis. Speculation indicates more of an informal grasp at straws without real proof or evidence or sources to prop it up. If you can argue against for your belief that mortals can outstrip the gods in potential, then by all means do so. But you need to provide sources or work around arguments already laid out. The lack of official confirmation or validation has nothing to do with its accuracy or not; most of the extraneous stuff we know or can guess about TES lore comes through http://www.imperial-library.info/fsg/ or rare phenomena (http://www.monkeytruth.net/) or unofficial http://www.imperial-library.info/obscure_text/.

Not to say that my view is correct, but it seems incredibly redundant to say "take it with a grain of salt" when 1) discussions like this are intended to flesh out and give explanation to things not confirmed or validated, and 2) you are incapable of disproving it.

My understanding was that the poster believed what you said to be true, and I simply told 'em that it was your belief, and that it should not be taken too seriously. I would not take my own idea very seriously, because there is no way to prove or disprove the thoughts or actions of gods. I was not implying that they should listen to me over yours or that you did not have a valid argument.

Like a scientist trying to confirm a hypothesis, he must also have others confirm the hypothesis. You must have a general acceptance of your ideas, with proof to substantiate it, in order for it to be taken as the truth.
User avatar
chirsty aggas
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 9:23 am

Post » Thu May 26, 2011 8:30 pm

Post limit
User avatar
Eliza Potter
 
Posts: 3481
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:20 am

Previous

Return to The Elder Scrolls Series Discussion