Tamriel a Deadric Realm?

Post » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:47 am

Though this discussion touches on a more fundamental qeustion, what is an Aedra? If the Daedra got together and build a world, would they also be Aedra?


I don't think the Daedra are creative by nature; more often destructive. They're ultimate selfishness.
User avatar
Invasion's
 
Posts: 3546
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 6:09 pm

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 3:56 pm

Though considering them separately, before the Aedra were recreated by myth, they were just a group of et'Ada like any other. They decided to cut parts of them self and create a new world, but a decision like that doesn't change what something is. The Daedra had the same abilities but chose to do it in another way.

I understand your point perfectly, I just disagree. The way I see it, the creation of the subgradient that is Nirn, the "attributions share" and the sacrifice of self all just differentiates them considerably from the Daedra; Mundus isn't the center of the egg/wheel while the daedric realms aren't for no good reason... daedra are just part of the system, mortals can escape it...
Though this discussion touches on a more fundamental qeustion, what is an Aedra? If the Daedra got together and build a world, would they also be Aedra?

Well, apart from that they wouldn't; if they went about that building of a new world in the same fashion that the 'Aedra' did then I'd say yes (well, they still wouldn't be 'Aedra' in the 'our ancestors' sense from the perspective of Nirn, but from completely outside they would be the same). Though I'm not sure what effect that would have on the universe, I'd reckon it'd screw it around royally... But since they haven't and they wouldn't, it doesn't change anything, they don't want to be like the Aedra...
User avatar
Amy Siebenhaar
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:51 am

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 2:02 pm

Lets not turn this into a Philascofabl discussion.


A what?!
User avatar
Andy durkan
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 3:05 pm

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:35 pm

A what?!


Philosophical, perhaps?
User avatar
KIng James
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:54 pm

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:01 pm

I don't think the Daedra are creative by nature; more often destructive. They're ultimate selfishness.

Sheo always struck me as being pretty creative, being the Prince of Madness. And having to rebuild the Isles every era.
User avatar
James Wilson
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:51 pm

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 4:30 pm

Don't think he mean...in the literal sense...especially since...that's his realm.

And he's a somewhat special case. I also view destructive as "chaotic," which is broader.
User avatar
Rebecca Clare Smith
 
Posts: 3508
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:13 pm

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:51 pm

Sheogorath isn't making anything new. He's simply rearranging material back into something old. Despite the colorful cataclysms that rock the SI every era, at it's core it's still only a cycle of receding back to pre-existing ideas.
User avatar
Shannon Marie Jones
 
Posts: 3391
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 3:19 pm

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:53 pm

Sheogorath isn't making anything new. He's simply rearranging material back into something old. Despite the colorful cataclysms that rock the SI every era, at it's core it's still only a cycle of receding back to pre-existing ideas.

The Manic side of madness is strongly tied with creativity. Without madness, can there be creativity?

And isn't all creating simply rearranging old material into something new?
User avatar
Lifee Mccaslin
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:03 am

Post » Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:24 am

The Manic side of madness is strongly tied with creativity. Without madness, can there be creativity?


It's the mortals who are doing the painting though. Sheo just sat around laughing.
User avatar
GPMG
 
Posts: 3507
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:55 am

Post » Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:52 am

It's the mortals who are doing the painting though. Sheo just sat around laughing.

But they were blessed with the gift of Sheogorath. And he did come up with names like Wabbajack and Gambolpuddy. Either way, Daedra are said to represent change.
User avatar
helliehexx
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 7:45 pm

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 4:28 pm

You can call it what you like, just remember that you can't.
User avatar
Eve Booker
 
Posts: 3300
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 7:53 pm

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 3:20 pm

But they were blessed with the gift of Sheogorath. And he did come up with names like Wabbajack and Gambolpuddy. Either way, Daedra are said to represent change.


Did people create madness or did madness exist before people? That isn't just some philosophical qeustion, it has an answer.
User avatar
butterfly
 
Posts: 3467
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:20 pm

Post » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:18 am

Did people create madness or did madness exist before people? That isn't just some philosophical qeustion, it has an answer.

But do we know the answer?
User avatar
Dawn Farrell
 
Posts: 3522
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:02 am

Post » Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:29 am

But do we know the answer?


Wouldn't know that if there wasn't an answer.
User avatar
James Potter
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:40 am

Previous

Return to The Elder Scrolls Series Discussion