Really? I understand that it's the same engine, same suit (supposedly), and, annoyingly enough, same city, but does it really have to look 95% like Crysis 2? I mean in the game's time it's been 20 years, so the above arguments really don't make sense from a chronological perspective.
Same thing with Mass Effect 3, except its problems weren't in the game's appearance, but in the missed opportunities. I mean, the situation between Crysis and Mass Effect is practically the same:
- Release first entry.
- Get bought by EA.
- Release a good second game.
- Release the third game in much less time than it took to release the second, with the third looking a lot like the second and having tons of problems.
I truly hope that Crytek can manage this small window of time that EA has set for them and release something truly amazing. Especially with regards to the multiplayer--make it blow away Call of Duty and everything else.
The nanosuit is evolving and adapting (just like the ceph, i mean it is their technology). Crytek is doing new things with Cryengine 3 that we didn't see in C2. And New York is now a literal jungle. And the game isn't due for another year so they have plenty of time to make changes graphic-wise.
Idk about you, but so far Crytek is managing fine and is creating something truly amazing. Multiplayer-wise...let's just hope it's everything C2 should have been