I've seen a lot of threads about bugs, lag, etc. I just wanted to make a positive post. The game has run perfect for me and it's the best looking game I have ever played. I recently built a new system for under $1400. I am very happy with this game and I'm glad I got it. Below are the specs for my new system.

MOBO: GIGABYTE GA-990FXA-UD3
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128514

CPU: AMD FX-4300 Vishera 3.8GHz
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819113287

GPU: GIGABYTE GV-R797OC-3GD Radeon HD 7970
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125413

RAM: CORSAIR Dominator GT 12GB
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820145329

I also bought a 1TB hard drive, Cooler Master HAF case, Cooler Master 700 Watt power supply, a new keyboard and mouse, and a new 25" LED monitor from HP. I already had one of the 25" LED monitors, so now I have a matching set sitting side by side.

You don't have to spend $3000 do build an awesome machine. My machine runs Crysis 3 with all of the graphics maxed out with absolutely no problems.

I have to agree. Im running an i7 3770k, 8 gigs of Crucial Bllistix Tracer 1600 and an HD 7970 GHz Edition and this game runs and looks beautiful on my system @ 1080 with all they eye candy cranked up.
Crytek did an amazing job with this title.

Yeah I see alot of those threads too, and surprisingly my pc runs this game flawlessly and my specs arn't impressive at all.
I think I have an amd tri core with and unlocked core (so quad core really) clocked at 3.5ghz,
4 gb ram (but I have a 32 bit windows 7, so really 3.12gb thats usable.)
and a gtx 560ti.
I can get 35 - 45 fps on average with all settings on High playing at 1080p.
I get like 25 fps on very high.
I'm very satisfied with the performance of this game. I just wish single player lasted longer.

Considering how gorgeous the game is the performance is pretty much what I expected, my system can run it set on very high and 4x SMAA, I cannot use Vsync though which is a bit disappointing. Still, the performance is good all things considered. I do think people expect too much sometimes and blame too many problems on poor optimization.

I got it going good too, especially using the Titan driver.
gtx 680 @1280Mhz + 3570k @ 4.7Ghz

I got it going good too, especially using the Titan driver.
gtx 680 @1280Mhz + 3570k @ 4.7Ghz

? titan driver wtf is the difference between normal driver for gtx 680?

i have same graphic card gtx 680 with i5 2500 k 4,4@ 8GB corsair cl8 fatality pro b3 with normal 314.07 WHQL for gtx 680 all maximum but something mixed very high and high didnt notice difference between high and very high did you ?

Doesn't for me. Needs a patch to fix erratic framerate with latest beta driver from NVIDIA.

? titan driver wtf is the difference between normal driver for gtx 680?

i have same graphic card gtx 680 with i5 2500 k 4,4@ 8GB corsair cl8 fatality pro b3 with normal 314.07 WHQL for gtx 680 all maximum but something mixed very high and high didnt notice difference between high and very high did you ?


titan driver runs smoother than any other nvidia driver. i made a thread here containing link.
remember too: in-game v sync disabled, adaptive v sync enabled, and set a frame rate limit with the CVar configurator) 60 works well.

running solid here also, so far