I think what he means is your statement about less features = less RPG...Or something like that. One of those points you constantly harp on about.
I do not appreciate the teneur of this post one bit mister.
If I 'constantly harp on about something,' perhaps one may consider that it is an important issue for me?
I dont know what kind of debating is going on but when one poster replies to something I did not say and the other poster has the notion to post a denigrating little message suggesting it might have to do with a hidden agenda of animosity towards the poster instead of honest debate on merits as presented, well then I get a little miffed.
If I 'constantly harp on about something' it might have something to do with the thought, against all amassed evidence, that if one points at the sky and says 'blue' enough that then maybe eventually other people will start to notice a certain blueness about the sky as well.
Removal of features = poorer RPG.
Why?
Because the game no longer supports the playing of certain roles in a roleplaying game, because the focus automatically shifts towards other game elements making each playthrough less diverse and for the very simple reasons that removing roleplaying options from an RPG is bad.
Basta.