Too many nerfs?

Post » Sun May 05, 2013 10:54 pm

I have not played since Data Patch C as there was money to be made.

But damn, the new balance patch is just nerfs left and right. Why Grendel?
User avatar
kyle pinchen
 
Posts: 3475
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 9:01 pm

Post » Mon May 06, 2013 2:59 am

Not enough nerf
Image
User avatar
Sarah Knight
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 5:02 am

Post » Sun May 05, 2013 4:37 pm

Not enough nerf
Image


LAWL!!!!!!!

It would take all your ammo to kill ANYONE...
User avatar
Jonathan Braz
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 10:29 pm

Post » Sun May 05, 2013 6:11 pm

25 darts isn't even nearly enough :/
User avatar
Britney Lopez
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:22 pm

Post » Sun May 05, 2013 12:20 pm

The nerfs were needed. Too many exploits. They are being fixed and I'm starting to see more balanced and competitive play
User avatar
louise fortin
 
Posts: 3327
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 4:51 am

Post » Sun May 05, 2013 1:28 pm

It's because the nerfs are all pretty conservative.. What would be really nice, (but I don't think we're going to see) is a comprehensive weapon rebalancing, where all the weapons are compared, assigned roles, then given stats that allow them to excel in those roles.
User avatar
Mrs. Patton
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:00 am

Post » Sun May 05, 2013 10:57 pm

On the positive side, the MAG-7 got nerfed in CSGO.

And Deagle, UMP-45, MAC-10, XM-1014 got buffed.

Believe it or not, there is more than one way to filet a fish. I don't know why Crytek only has one word in their balancing repertoire.

Image
User avatar
Monique Cameron
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 6:30 am

Post » Mon May 06, 2013 2:43 am

I used the Grendel before and after the patch. I didn't even know it had a PBM. Suffice to say, I didn't notice anything different about.

But the DSG accuracy?

HOT DAMNNNNNNNNNNNN
User avatar
Marcin Tomkow
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:31 pm

Post » Sun May 05, 2013 8:19 pm

I used the Grendel before and after the patch. I didn't even know it had a PBM. Suffice to say, I didn't notice anything different about.

But the DSG accuracy?

HOT DAMNNNNNNNNNNNN


Yeah playing with the grendel afterwards, it doesn't feel like it was affected by the nerf much.
User avatar
Louise Dennis
 
Posts: 3489
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:23 pm

Post » Mon May 06, 2013 3:48 am

Yeah everyone agrees with nerfing the game so aimbotters are more powerful and anything against their power is bad. DSG increased accuracy helps aimbots assault rifle point blank realistic damage hurts aimbots. Anything that benefits a fast realistic shot which is a better gunman in real life is bad and anything super precise and or an aimbot is good according to all your counter strike source babies. In real life a guy that can draw fast and hit a target first although it might not be a perfect headshot is a better gunfighter than some guy that pulls his gun lines up a perfect headshot or swipe across the head and tries to line up every shot perfectly. They used to illustrate this in old gangster movies about bootlegging. Too bad this reality is lost on you counter strike aimbot babies.

P.S. This is why you are losing and your aimbots have made you lazy most of you sound asleep when you talk on the mic your not even amped up. There is something wrong with you guys you should be getting pumped when you play. Every good gamer I know gets pumped. Until you learn this you will fail. Just because my killcams are not as pretty as yours doesnt matter the facts are that I get the drop on you almost everytime and I play on mostly european servers where I have a 200+ ping and I'm still getting the drop on you by a longshot. You can nerf the game any way you want to and you are never going to beat that. All you are doing is making yourself look ridiculous. The only reason headshotting and lining up all your shots worked in the past is because in counter strike and battlefield you have very limited movement speed(same thing in c2). You run like molasses in those games which I always thought made it for noobs. In the quake series you run fast. Really Crysis 3(I love the movement in this game so fluid and quick, really I think cloak mode and armor mode should be faster and abandon the single energy pool idea manu should be standard and aa should also be standard quake with armor was just a more satisfying game because it makes the targets hard to kill high kill games aka "hardcoe" are just unsatisfying because the target dies too fast it flattens the skill curve(the whole point of making high kill aka "hardcoe" games with low armor like all the army games(cod,bf,cs)is because the quake players became so high in skill that it would take years to match their performance and scare away new gamers instead gaming should be viewed as joining a guild and that it will take you years to become the best as is true in war you are not the ultimate soldier in a few months but armor changes everything in a no armor world you have to hide and camp and use ambush tactics in an armor world with respawn fortune favors the bold agressor especially in point capture game full of ametuers to kill) is like Quake 5 with ADSing and a bunch of assault rifles. See this is why you should have gone back and played Quake and respected that older generation of gamers because now you see that you don't measure up.

User avatar
gandalf
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 6:57 pm


Return to Crysis