Forsworn, good or bad?

Post » Thu May 23, 2013 9:49 am

Well, their cause is not bad, just even. But it is not justified by the way they act. I say bad, they have since long abandoned their original belief to retake the Reach. Altough that may still be a primary goal, i think it is more about revange and hate against the Nords. Would they be content if they get the reach? I think not, murders against the nords would continue.

Even if the Nords are the ones who drove then to be bad, they are still themselves bad and if they do not prove otherwise I say they are bad. Seeing as they attack all who is not forsworn and not only nords as well.

User avatar
Vivien
 
Posts: 3530
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:47 pm

Post » Thu May 23, 2013 1:58 pm

Bad, as they attack indiscriminately. If they only attacked soldiers, it might be more defensible, but slaughtering civilians is just wrong.

User avatar
ezra
 
Posts: 3510
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 6:40 pm

Post » Thu May 23, 2013 2:18 am

Well the first problem is defining what's good and bad who draws a line in the sand and says thing on this side are good and things on that side are bad ?. Who has the right to draw such a line and where do they get that right from ?.

User avatar
Chris Duncan
 
Posts: 3471
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 2:31 am

Post » Thu May 23, 2013 3:35 am

Don't try too hard to have a different opinion. It's pretty clear that they are villains.
User avatar
Nicholas C
 
Posts: 3489
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:20 am

Previous

Return to V - Skyrim