I've been mulling over doing a Legion play through, but despite having done one in the past I just can't bring myself to do it now. Despite all the slavery, sixism and general atrocities which have already been discussed at length - I think we all know they're bad - I can't see a single reason why anyone would want to follow them. To list the pros and cons:
Pros:
- Stability as a nation (no corrupt bureaucracy, an iron-fisted rule).
Cons:
- Stability will be short-lived, unlike some real ancient roman emperors (Augustus namely) Caesar hasn't made any plans of who could feasibly adopt the mantle of leadership after he dies - a glaring oversight especially with his death looming large at the start of the game. If anything he's made it such that the Legion is centered around his own cult of personality, outright telling the player that the Legate has no loyalty to the Legion - a very dubious choice of command for a sustainable future.
- Caesar has zero plans for the future; sure he may prattle on about Hegelian dialectics but he makes no comment of what the "synthesis" following destruction of the NCR will entail. It seems like a completely shallow argument - there's zero proof anything will change at all. Besides, doesn't Hegelian dialectics also apply to the NCR - wouldn't they benefit from destroying the Legion in a similar manner? His philosophical ramblings are a mark of his intellectual vainglory, nothing more.
- Revelling in atrocities, the slavery, the sixism. A Luddite backwards society, who actively avoid technology they could use to their own benefit (only up until the grand "synthesis", of course).
I can't see any reason to logically follow Caesar over Mr House - who has all of the benefits yet none of the cons. That only leaves characters who would follow the Legion out of a personal bias, which is fine but it's not particularly fun to play someone who is blindly following a fool. Does anyone have any reasons as to why the Legion is a better faction to follow relative to the others?