Is Skyrim a Lackluster RPG? #3

Post » Thu Feb 27, 2014 12:49 pm

Previously in thread 2

User avatar
Allison Sizemore
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:09 am

Post » Thu Feb 27, 2014 12:47 pm

I wonder why none of the devs ever post here. I also wonder whether they actually read this forum with haste or whilst sipping tea.

User avatar
Izzy Coleman
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 3:34 am

Post » Thu Feb 27, 2014 3:53 pm

To summarize my previous posts and opinion: Yes it is, better than most games, worse than other Beth games.

User avatar
lucile
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:37 pm

Post » Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:05 am

I consider myself a TES fan, not an RPG fan. I'm a fan of the world that Betheada gives us, and freedom that they give us.

RPG's on the other hand? I'm utterly useless at them. And I wouldn't really consider Skyrim an RPG.
User avatar
Star Dunkels Macmillan
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 4:00 pm

Post » Thu Feb 27, 2014 9:35 pm

The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim is better than Dragon Age 2. But is worse than The Elder Scrolls III: Morrowind and The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, and The Witcher and The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings (and this year hopefully The Wither 3: Wild Hunt) are better than The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim. So I agree with you in the last part of your comment.

User avatar
Heather Dawson
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:14 pm

Post » Thu Feb 27, 2014 11:30 pm

That's is fine, I disagree with the Witcher though. Hated that game to pieces. Skyrim was a lot more enjoyable to me. Morrowind and Oblivion were a lot better than Skyrim though. Fallout 3 was better than Oblivion and Skyrim though.

User avatar
Dean Ashcroft
 
Posts: 3566
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:20 am

Post » Thu Feb 27, 2014 2:15 pm

What I meant that The Witcher and The Witcher 2: Assasins of Kings being better than The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim is that I was referring to the quests having branching paths with consequences.

User avatar
Kelsey Hall
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:10 pm

Post » Thu Feb 27, 2014 8:26 pm

Ah, well then yes I will give you that. To be fair though not a lot of games have very branching quest lines, but I do see your point.

User avatar
Killah Bee
 
Posts: 3484
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 12:23 pm

Post » Thu Feb 27, 2014 9:06 am

ditto

ditto too. Although I'm fairly good at RPGs I like to think. And where you see freedom I see the removal of choice. But mostly I agree with you. :)

User avatar
Jamie Moysey
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 6:31 am

Post » Thu Feb 27, 2014 3:58 pm

I agree with the "definition" of role playing game as spelled out on wikipedia:

"A role-playing video game (commonly referred to as role-playing game or RPG, as well as computer RPG or CRPG) is a video game genre where the player controls the actions of a protagonist (or several adventuring party members) immersed in a fictional world". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Role-playing_video_game#Hybrid_genres

Going by that definition, then for me, Skyrim is a competent RPG imo. No way would I consider it "Lackluster". But I suppose it boils down to what one regards as "Lackluster", like a lot of threads on here, its subjective in interpretation to the point of immensely personal.

User avatar
Damien Mulvenna
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 3:33 pm

Post » Thu Feb 27, 2014 7:28 pm


I don't know about that. Dragon Age 2 has attributes and classes after all.

...In case obvious joke wasn't obvious, the above is an obvious joke. Obviously.
User avatar
Brιonα Renae
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 3:10 am

Post » Thu Feb 27, 2014 8:07 pm

:lmao:

That actually made me lol!
User avatar
Marcin Tomkow
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:31 pm

Post » Thu Feb 27, 2014 12:38 pm

lol. Isn't that like, the definition of almost every video game made?

User avatar
Eire Charlotta
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 6:00 pm

Post » Thu Feb 27, 2014 4:27 pm

That definition is way too general and inadequate. You control a protagonist in a fictional world when playing Mario and Sonic.

Look at it this way:

Action game: Control a character or object and perform actions (jumping, shooting, fighting, etc)

Adventure game: Control a character through an interactive story, exploring and solving puzzles, interacting with NPCs using branching dialogue

Action-adventure game: Combination of action and adventure elements

RPG: Control a character or party of characters with numeric values (attributes, skills, etc) used to simulate progression and allow for unique interactions with the gameworld

RPGs may contain varying degrees of elements from the action genre and the adventure genre, but playing as a character in a fictional world is, by itself, not a defining aspect of the genre. The defining aspect that sets it apart from other genres is character development.

So in order to judge Skyrim as a game, you would take into consideration the whole package (action elements such as combat, adventure elements such as storyline, exploration, dialogue and puzzle solving, RPG elements such as character creation and developent; and of course the design and quality of the open world itself). In order to judge Skyrim purely as an RPG however, you should look only at the way in which stats simulate character development and allow for meaningful interactions with the gameworld (e.g. what can a really strong character do that a weak character cannot?)

With that in mind I would consider Skyrim to be a poor RPG because character development seems so basic with minimal impact on gameworld interaction. I would also consider Skyrim a bad action game, an average adventure game, and a disappointing open world game... but those are different discussions. ;)

User avatar
meghan lock
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:26 pm


Return to V - Skyrim