The Nature of the Daedra [continued]

Post » Thu Mar 06, 2014 8:30 am

Yes, I improved the name of the thread and put it in the proper forum category, but this is a sequel to, "http://www.gamesas.com/topic/1488341-its-about-time-we-killed-a-daedric-prince/"

To continue the discussion: (in reply to MK-{Omega-X} apparently the 624th person called, "MK" :tongue: .)

______________________________________________________________________________

Now, about your question, I do believe the provided passage is still relevant to this day, (after all, the book obviously wasn't written in the Dawn Era).

It is true that Et'ada created their realms, I certainly doubt that their, "complete control" is much more than political force or exaggerated strength. Here's another piece of text I've probably already brought to this argument:

http://www.imperial-library.info/content/nu-mantia-intercept-letter-7

http://www.imperial-library.info/content/nu-mantia-intercept-letter-7

http://www.imperial-library.info/content/nu-mantia-intercept-letter-7

http://www.imperial-library.info/content/nu-mantia-intercept-letter-7

This text tells us, (at least as I view it) that daedric realm are little more than intentional outer realms, brilliant architectural masterpieces, if you will.

And with this in mind, we can recall that no one seems to be able to control outer realms themselves, or the Mundus for that matter.

Besides, (within my knowledge) we've never observed a daedroth exercise this complete power, even when it would have been practical.

User avatar
Shianne Donato
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 5:55 am

Post » Thu Mar 06, 2014 12:52 pm

Ah, but observe this for a moment, the Daedra didn't lend/limit themselves in the formation of Mundus and formed their realms mockingly, a "We can do just as you did without sacrific". the text provided further Highlights that the Daedra cannot "create" like the Aedra, only change from one form to another to fit their desires.

I venture to argue that in essense these two class of entities didn't really create anything, the Aedra coalesced themselves, and the Daedra coalesced matter around themselves.

Speculation aside, my question is.

Are you suggesting Et'ada have no viable reason to be infinite and unending as the Daedra are precieved as? I understand countless of spirits were lost ended in sythesis, and had say Boethiah contributed she'd be in the same basket as Mara or Julianos.

but isn't the formation a whole other basket in comparison to a Et'ada being endable (not even a word). nevermind by mortals

User avatar
Emma
 
Posts: 3287
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:51 am


Return to The Elder Scrolls Series Discussion