TESO will still have the mega server s for both consoles but since I'll be playing on PS4, I just hope I can with all setting on High quality without lag.
Different engines, so can't really make a direct correlation.
It's hard to compare the two really.
Elderscrolls online is much less dense, and more controlled in regards to rendering zones then watch dogs.
Judging by what we've been seen with "true" next gen titles, I am more than confident that ESO will run with same visual options as it's PC counterpart.
Oh, okay. But do you know if it'll be the highest possible settings for the consoles?
OP can you please provide citations, thank you.
I'm guessing they will have to compromise view distance and things like that, that put a lot of stress on the cpu.
youre talking about team #girlwood ubisoft. they somehow made farcry 3 look worse than farcry 1. barely a b tier developer imo.
You kidding me? I loved Far Cry 3! Vaas made the game humorous too!
Okay well Ubisoft haven't announced or denied that these are the graphics for the PS4 and the Xbox one version, you can clearly read so why you failed to read that part beats me. For all you know the graphics shown in this most recent trailer could be for the PS3 and Xbox 360 version which makes more sense than people jumping to conclusions think that it's set and stone and these are the PS4 graphics in this trailer.That or this trailer back in 2012 was for the PC version.
it's not subjective opinion to state that far cry 3 looks worse in every way to far cry 1...imo
heck, it looked like more equivalent graphically to The Darkness. the animations were terrible, sound was terrible, that game franchise dropped in quality faster than I can believe. the ai is kind of broken in Far Cry 1, with enemies being able to see through walls and stuff, but other than that Far Cry 1 is superior to the 3rd installment in just about every way.
You have to remember the first Far Cry was made by Crytek and people were using pics of that and Crysis side by side with real life photos. Far Cry 3 isn't even close to that kind of graphical fidelity. I played it for about 10 minutes and uninstalled, so dissapointing. I mean, I don't really think of myself as a graphics [censored] by any means but there's just no excuse for that game looking as badly as it did.
The PC client is very well optimized. With all the options maxed, it's constant 90fps even at 1440p and without consuming very many system resources at all (well under 50% GPU and CPU utilization). I'd imagine the consoles could manage 60fps at 1080p with minimal issues, assuming the client is equally as well optimized.
Isn't it odd that the same day this becomes an issue, Wii u version of the game is getting setback and is experiencing (Technical difficulties) I think you've got your answer.
http://www.cinemablend.com/games/Watch-Dogs-Wii-U-Delay-Explained-It-Good-News-62673.html
Totally different developers so the point is moot. Ubisoft has been delaying and having issues with every game they are currently developing. Would definitely NOT want to compare anything with Ubisoft at the moment.
South Park Stick of Truth isn't a bad game by ubisoft it's actually quite enjoyable to play and it runs smooth as silk.
Lord Blaze Streak you are like one of the meddlesome neighbors, what isn't your business you make your business, plus you have been against consoles the entire time. Usually people worry about what directly concerns them, but I guess when you are bored then a person is bored, you're pc no?
No guys there will not be an issue, just recently played the FFXIV arr beta on ps4 graphics were stellar. Hadn't had the glorious option of going into Mor Dhona the Hub brain center but the graphics were remarkable.
And this will be my only comment to this thread, and I use that term loosely.
Aeno