I assume both are available for the pc. I've just been reading some of your discussions about them elsewhere in this forum and got curious. At this point, I'm still playing Skyrim itself.
I assume both are available for the pc. I've just been reading some of your discussions about them elsewhere in this forum and got curious. At this point, I'm still playing Skyrim itself.
both are good. which one is better? i have done part of dawnguard. if you like being a vampire or killing them, well this willl do it. you can become a vampire lord, much stronger than the OB and morrowind ones.
haven't done the other DLC yet.
I like the story in Dawnguard better but Dragonborn has much more content. You cant go wrong with either one.
I feel that DB is the better DLC. It improves on many of the vanilla game's shortcomings with regards to world design and exploration.
Though as titus001 wrote, DG is what the vanilla guilds should have been like.
I like Dawnguard for the Werewolf and Vampire skilltrees.
But I also like Dragonborn for the Blackbook powers
In conculsion: Get both
I expected to like Dragonborn the most but I found to my surprise that I liked Dawnguard much better.
I loved Bloodmoon, it is still my favorite Elder Scrolls expansion. So seeing my beloved Solstheim so ravaged and desolate was pretty depressing to me. But even more importantly, I thought Dragonborn's main quest was short and uninteresting. Its side quests were slightly better, but not enough to make up for the lack in every other area.
I was much more engaged by Dawnguard's story and NPCs. I think Serana is the best companion Bethesda has created yet. On top of that I thought the Soul Cairn and Forgotten Vale were much more interesting places to explore than Solstheim.
So I prefer Dawnguard.
Totally agree with my learned friend Pseron Wyrd!