I mean, Harkon and Serana are over four thousand years old. Why do you think they are both so pitiful in battle?
I mean, Harkon and Serana are over four thousand years old. Why do you think they are both so pitiful in battle?
Possibly due to the fact that some people might consider them to be overpowered if they were tougher. I don't know for sure, but it probably is due to limitation in gameplay (as others have mentioned already).
I expect the explanation is meant to be something along the lines of Harkon is arrogant and underestimates you, yadda yadda.
Eh... no. Not trying to be dismissive here but Adept evens the game. On Legendary Olava the Feeble could hand you your [censored] on a satin cushion, Hagrid.
Sorry, I misread. No, I like to keep the difficulty the same at all times until a new playthrough, in which I do the same, and so on. Thanks anyway, though.
Because if Vampires fought like some people wanted them to (like me) it'd be waaaaay too interesting for a game lol.
Seriously though, boss characters in Skyrim weren't really that challenging to begin with. The only real way they could be hard for someone is if you fought one of them nvde courier style, or just got unlucky and ran across them at a low level.
Because Bethesda does not know how to balance. So the MQ Bosses are easy and level-scaled, while the common high-level enemies are over-powered.
In my opinion it's a very good suggestion. I prefer using the difficulty level dynamically.
Although I don't like to die a lot, I really like epic battles against special enemies, and for a battle to be epic it needs some time.
If Harkon was any harder than he currently is, he still would be the worst boss.
This is why I can not play Skyrim without mods.
I want to play with mods but I am unable to. I'm on the Xbox and cannot afford a shiny, new gaming PC.
Well Vyrthur's a bit of a toughie! (My favourite boss fight.)