What is the correct answer? Or is stupidity inevitable?
What is the correct answer? Or is stupidity inevitable?
Try getting the rest of the world to understand that.
Reminds me of a poster at the restorations shop: There 3 ways to get the job done. The Fast Way, The Cheap Way, & The Correct Way. You can pick two of any option, but cannot have all three.
But what if self-preservation is objectively good and blueberry muffins were very healthy for you, wouldn't blueberry muffins then be objectively good?
Not totally sure what is correct but not making annoyingly vague threads is probably a step toward correct-ness
The way you framed the question on this topic is just poor. I don't know what your motivation is on this topic - discussion or spam - and I'm gearing toward the latter because you barely provide substantial input before you start another vague question. Why don't clarify your position on this?
Really, are you asking if we ever have perfect objective knowledge or are we doomed to ignorance? Ignorance isn't stupidity. The former means a lack of knowledge; the latter is associated with poor judgment despite knowledge. Also, a well-developed understanding of any topic recognizes that we don't really know what goes on in any observed phenomena. Even among well-established scientific laws that have been tested against empirical methods throughout history, there is a very small chance to be incorrect and that our understanding of the underlying phenomena changes. Look at the shift from Newtonian physics to Einstein's relativity: Our knowledge of the laws of motion have been transformed to incorporate new ways of understanding celestial phenomena.
You're being facetious, right?