What Is Correct?

Post » Fri May 09, 2014 11:59 am

What is the correct answer? Or is stupidity inevitable?

User avatar
rheanna bruining
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 11:00 am

Post » Fri May 09, 2014 2:43 am

2+2=5

User avatar
Connie Thomas
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 9:58 am

Post » Fri May 09, 2014 11:55 am

There are only correct absolutes regarding proven scientific fact and the laws that govern the physics of this world.

Example: 2+2 always = 4. This cannot change.

Blueberry Muffins are good = subjective point of view.
User avatar
Shannon Lockwood
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:38 pm

Post » Fri May 09, 2014 9:05 am

Try getting the rest of the world to understand that.

User avatar
SWagg KId
 
Posts: 3488
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 8:26 am

Post » Fri May 09, 2014 4:24 am

Reminds me of a poster at the restorations shop: There 3 ways to get the job done. The Fast Way, The Cheap Way, & The Correct Way. You can pick two of any option, but cannot have all three.

User avatar
Darren
 
Posts: 3354
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 2:33 pm

Post » Fri May 09, 2014 12:48 pm

But what if self-preservation is objectively good and blueberry muffins were very healthy for you, wouldn't blueberry muffins then be objectively good?

User avatar
FirDaus LOVe farhana
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:42 am

Post » Fri May 09, 2014 4:29 am

Develop.

User avatar
Laura Hicks
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:21 am

Post » Fri May 09, 2014 7:59 am

Reliability.

User avatar
Helen Quill
 
Posts: 3334
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 1:12 pm

Post » Fri May 09, 2014 5:42 am

Whatever the doctor's say. (???)

User avatar
Sheila Reyes
 
Posts: 3386
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 7:40 am

Post » Fri May 09, 2014 11:03 am

Not totally sure what is correct but not making annoyingly vague threads is probably a step toward correct-ness

User avatar
Hot
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 6:22 pm

Post » Fri May 09, 2014 10:01 am

The way you framed the question on this topic is just poor. I don't know what your motivation is on this topic - discussion or spam - and I'm gearing toward the latter because you barely provide substantial input before you start another vague question. Why don't clarify your position on this?

Really, are you asking if we ever have perfect objective knowledge or are we doomed to ignorance? Ignorance isn't stupidity. The former means a lack of knowledge; the latter is associated with poor judgment despite knowledge. Also, a well-developed understanding of any topic recognizes that we don't really know what goes on in any observed phenomena. Even among well-established scientific laws that have been tested against empirical methods throughout history, there is a very small chance to be incorrect and that our understanding of the underlying phenomena changes. Look at the shift from Newtonian physics to Einstein's relativity: Our knowledge of the laws of motion have been transformed to incorporate new ways of understanding celestial phenomena.

You're being facetious, right?

User avatar
Jessica Lloyd
 
Posts: 3481
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 2:11 pm

Post » Fri May 09, 2014 3:56 pm

You're not even trying anymore, Lexie.

User avatar
Shiarra Curtis
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:22 pm

Post » Fri May 09, 2014 3:18 pm

Sorry.

User avatar
Bee Baby
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 4:47 am


Return to Othor Games