The Fallout theory

Post » Wed Mar 11, 2015 5:00 am

This is a theory explaining the fallout universe from the perspective of the main protagonists of most fallout games...

The theory goes that all the protagonists from the fallout series are the same person in a vault tech simulation. In fallout one they are testing how people would act if their vault depended on them and what they would do to help them. After the quest was complete they told him that he was exiled seeing what his reaction would be, after being in the simulation so long all of his memories had been lost making him believe it was real life. To stop him going insane when his character died they put him in a different perspective his son the chosen one and kept running the simulation. The second test fallout 2 was testing what the survivors reaction to the remaining government forces. After fallout 2 to stop you from going insane when the chosen one died they moved you to another perspective, the warrior from fallout tactics to see what you would do serving under a new government force. After fallout tactics they did the same thing again and moved you into the perspective of the lone wanderer from fallout 3. The test this time was to see what you would choose for the wasteland to side with the enclave or the brother hood of steel. though the simulator suffered many glitches when in the dunwich building as some of your memories of the building itself are momentarily shown. Then finally in fallout new vegas they test yet another perspective testing what fate you would decide for the Hoover dam.

As far as my theory goes you are still in the simulation waiting for fallout 4. Another little "Easter egg" is in the description of the game from xbox 360 store says vault tech your first choice in post-apocalyptic simulation. I did not take this from any other page or website i just made it up in my head using the " evidence " i had. What do you think...

User avatar
Lori Joe
 
Posts: 3539
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:10 am

Post » Tue Mar 10, 2015 10:33 pm

:down:

User avatar
Astargoth Rockin' Design
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:51 pm

Post » Wed Mar 11, 2015 5:56 am

I think it's an interesting idea, but probably not intentional.

Hadn't really thought about it but you're kind of right about the different games dealing with different issues.

Probably would fit in better in a different part of the forum though, it's not really Fan Fiction, an RP, or Art.

User avatar
Enny Labinjo
 
Posts: 3480
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:04 pm

Post » Wed Mar 11, 2015 4:36 am

It's not the Fallout theory, but the 'Sequel' theory.

And it's basically Assassin's Creed. It was a bad idea in Assassin's Creed. It was only done because they wanted to have an overarching story element - that unfortunately has no relevance at all.

User avatar
NeverStopThe
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 11:25 pm

Post » Wed Mar 11, 2015 12:26 am

I liked it in the first AC game or two but then they got greedy and it became an annual thing.
User avatar
gary lee
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:49 pm

Post » Wed Mar 11, 2015 5:51 am

How do i move it to the correct forum i only joined recently so im not sure how.

You don't. You can ask a Mod to move it, by using either the report button at the bottom left of every post, or by PMing a Mod directly.

User avatar
e.Double
 
Posts: 3318
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:17 pm

Post » Wed Mar 11, 2015 12:21 am

I judge this theory to the same level as the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulated_reality theory.

That is to say, sure its possible. And there's nothing that can disprove it really.......but why?

If its true it cheapens the series immensely and makes everything meaningless.

User avatar
James Hate
 
Posts: 3531
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 5:55 am


Return to Fallout Series Discussion