Heavily Modded Skyrim, steady 60+ FPS @ 1080p max settings?

Post » Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:11 pm

Will be shopping for a new laptop soon and I'm hoping to go back and install texture and graphics mods I was never able to run properly before.

Would be great if I can manage to get steady 60fps @1080p while recording video. I understand this might not be possible with some of the most demanding mods and tweaks, for example some of the stuff featured on Dead End Thrills, but in general if you are able to do this, can you share your computer specs and which mods you are using?

Also, are there certain scripting heavy mods that make it very difficult to get smooth 60fps? And how important is video memory for large texture mods? Do any of you see more than 4GB or 6GB VRAM usage?

User avatar
le GraiN
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:48 pm

Post » Fri Sep 04, 2015 1:44 am

That would indeed be nice, but my i5, R9 390 pc will struggle to record 1080 @ 60fps. Its the cpu overheads and unless you have a disk with a fast write speed that'll cause stuttering too as video files will be large.

The only "safe" way of doing it is via some kind of external recording device.

User avatar
Emily Martell
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:41 am

Post » Fri Sep 04, 2015 3:29 am

Some mods like JK Skyrim will drag down your FPS no matter how good your system. I was getting a constant 55-60 FPS until I installed JK Skyrim and now there are a couple spots in cities that momentarily drop to 20-30.

I have a 4670k, 780ti with 16 GB RAM.

Here's my load order,

Active Mod Files:
Spoiler
00  Skyrim.esm01  Update.esm02  Unofficial Skyrim Patch.esp  [Version 2.1.1]03  Dawnguard.esm04  Unofficial Dawnguard Patch.esp  [Version 2.1.1]05  HearthFires.esm06  Unofficial Hearthfire Patch.esp  [Version 2.1.1]07  Dragonborn.esm08  Unofficial Dragonborn Patch.esp  [Version 2.1.1]09  ClimatesOfTamriel.esm0A  ETaC - RESOURCES.esm0B  TouringCarriages.esp0C  ClimatesOfTamriel-Dawnguard-Patch.esp0D  iHUD.esp0E  Convenient Horses.esp0F  ClimatesOfTamriel-Nights-Level-5.esp10  RaceMenu.esp11  WATER DG.esp12  Compass Marker Range 5000-10000.esp13  SkyUI.esp14  LessIntrusiveHUD.esp15  SMIM-FarmhouseFlickeringFix.esp16  SMIM-DungeonsCliffsIceSkirts.esp17  WATER.esp18  WetandCold.esp19  WetandCold - Ashes.esp1A  SkyFalls + SkyMills + DG + DB.esp1B  WATER DB.esp1C  Immersive Patrols II.esp1D  Chesko_Frostfall.esp1E  SkyFalls Dragonborn Small waterfalls.esp1F  Requiem.esp20  ETaC - Complete.esp21  CollegeOfWinterholdImmersive.esp22  CWIDawnDragonPatch.esp23  ETaC - Dragon Bridge South.esp24  CWINPCImprovements.esp25  NRM Dragonborn - Requiem Patch.esp  [Version 1.0.9]26  Wintermyst - Enchantments of Skyrim.esp27  Requiem - USKP + UDGP.esp28  BetterQuestObjectives.esp  [Version 1.5.1]29  BetterQuestObjectives-RequiemPatch.esp2A  JKs Skyrim Major Cities.esp2B  FloraRespawnFix.esp2C  Requiem - Flora Respawn fix.esp2D  Immersive Orc Strongholds.esp2E  Immersive Whiterun.esp2F  Immersive Solstheim.esp30  SFO - Dragonborn.esp31  Requiem - Hearthfire.esp32  ETaC - Complete Requiem Patch.esp33  _tck_SpellCrafting.esp34  Requiem - Immersive Patrols.esp35  Skyrim Flora Overhaul.esp36  Dawnstar_Player_Home.esp37  WATER Plants.esp38  Argonian Access.esp39  Apocalypse - The Spell Package.esp3A  Apocalypse - Requiem Compatibility Patch.esp3B  Requiem - Frostfall.esp3C  NoAnimalsReportCrimes-DG+DB+Requiem.esp3D  VioLens.esp  [Version 2.1]3E  VioLens - Requiem Patch.esp  [Version 2.1]3F  Requiem - Wintermyst.esp40  Alternate Start - Live Another Life.esp  [Version 3.0.1]41  BetterQuestObjectives-AlternateStartPatch.esp42  Warburg's 3D Paper World Map - Texture 1.esp43  Warburg's 3D Paper World Map - Dragonborn.esp44  warburg's 3d paper world map - dawnguard.esp45  Requiem for the Indifferent.esp
User avatar
Laura Tempel
 
Posts: 3484
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:53 pm

Post » Thu Sep 03, 2015 10:45 pm

Regarding visual/graphic mods: it entirely depends on the performance impact it can have from system to system and mod list to mod list so I can't give a generalized assessment there.

On VRAM: At that resolution 3-4gb is the sweet spot really, unless you plan to use a lot of graphic mods like 4k textures, higher def poly mesh replacers, etc.. imo really 4k @2k gaming is still just a pretty waste for me, some will claim that "oh there's a difference still" etc.. but really the difference is quite a subtle one and these people probably play with their monitors real close to their eyes, unless you're using some form of downsampling using overly high res textures above your monitors max pixel resolution isn't the best lod(level of detail):perfomance ratio you'll get. If you're able to get something like a card with 6gb of vram; my personal suggestion would be to just get a 4gb one really, but if you are able to get a 6gb one try and just stick to that unless the card you're getting is like a titan x or a 980 ti, problem with cards with 8gb of vram that are even a bit below the tier end consumer base of those two cards right now is 95% of them I can guarantee you will start chug on the power of the card itself when you're utilizing 80-90% of the vram usage of the 8gb; this bottleneck on the vram size:gpu performance is well know as vram increases to like some whatever niche amount nvidia or amd puts into their semi high end cards. Then again it will also probably heavily depend again on how heavy the 3d screen rendering of a 3d application to make the gpu get bottlnecked by its horsepower when you use like 7gb/8gb of your vram. I don't have much experience with cards on the range of 6gb so I can't tell you if I can make the same assessment but with a little research you can quickly find the gpu power:vram capping ratio of that card and see if u can really make use of even 5gb of vram in most scenarios if not then I'd say go for a 4gb one really since the extra you pay for even a 6gb version won't really hold up to how well gpus on the market as of this moment will perform on a near 80-90%vram usage, especially if you expect to run 3d applications with standard or the most latest post processing effects at max or for instance Skyrim use enbs.

If you max/cap out on you gpu's vram, ram/hdd texture file swapping which is a a magnitude than what a gpu's ram/bandwidth speed is (depending on the system memory/storage drives you have ofc) Also mesh assets also contribute to vram/ram usage

Regarding game recording:

Best suggestion I can give really is to just go for a game capture card if you have a setup to accommodate it, performance impact is near 0- negligible whilst recording with a dedicated screen capture card.

Edit : If you plan on screen recording using a software solution then try and get either a dedicated storage drive to write capture media in (ssds would be the best choice a hdd will work very much quite well as well in reducing the performance impact whilst recording and playing as long as you record to a dedicated drive really.)

General recommendations/suggestions:

As of the moment of writing for Skyrim at least and a lot of other games is get an Intel cpu, I use AMD myself but in the near future I'm definitely going to be switching back to Intel.

Disk performance ie. SSDs/Raid setups will help a lot in performance in just about any system experience.

My specs:

FX 9350 - 8GB RAM - R9 290X

I don't use much graphic/visual mods in my normal playthroughs really so I don't think my mod setup/play setup will provide any useful benchmarks for you; plus I usually play at 1280x800 for just games :tongue: I know I'm weird. It's mostly because I want a constant 59 framerate for Skyrim and a lot of games for instance and I don't at all mind the resolution and such, also I run a lot of background applications that hog some cpu and vram usage 50-70% of the time so this kind of setup is ideal to me.

last I played this on a higher was; iirc I get around 45-50 ( using a limiter at 50fps) in the most heaviest of mod setups I have at 2560x1440p

User avatar
Matt Terry
 
Posts: 3453
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 10:58 am


Return to V - Skyrim