Vehicles... PLEASE! And more places with people.

Post » Thu Nov 26, 2015 8:25 pm

When will people realize this game isn't supposed to have motorized transport? Seriously.... Beth doesn't want people traveling the map in 2 minutes end to end
User avatar
Joey Avelar
 
Posts: 3370
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 11:11 am

Post » Thu Nov 26, 2015 5:23 pm

Is it as impotent this time?
User avatar
Mandi Norton
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:43 pm

Post » Fri Nov 27, 2015 6:44 am

You mean does the very low yield nuclear bomb not destroy a city like it logically shouldn't be able to do?

Yes.

User avatar
Captian Caveman
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 5:36 am

Post » Thu Nov 26, 2015 8:22 pm

In classic soup nazi fashion ...

NO SOUP For You !!!

User avatar
Dj Matty P
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 12:31 am

Post » Fri Nov 27, 2015 3:35 am

Ha. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khyZI3RK2lE

_______

If possible, I plan to try modding this in as a PA variant; a vehicle.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/70/One_wheel_motorcycle_Goventosa.jpg
User avatar
Mr. Allen
 
Posts: 3327
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 8:36 am

Post » Fri Nov 27, 2015 3:33 am

Real world nukes =/= Fallout nukes.

Dont forget, Fallout's nukes traded most of the explosive force in exchange for larger radiation output.

User avatar
Talitha Kukk
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 1:14 am

Post » Thu Nov 26, 2015 6:25 pm

tl;dnr version: we don't know jacksh!t about the game except for a few selected minutes of video.

User avatar
Nikki Hype
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 12:38 pm

Post » Fri Nov 27, 2015 5:08 am

Doesn't matter. The range is not going to be 40 feet.
User avatar
lydia nekongo
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:04 pm

Post » Fri Nov 27, 2015 2:03 am

[citation needed]

don't think we have seen the complex technical math behind how Fallout nukes work.

User avatar
Nicola
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:57 am

Post » Fri Nov 27, 2015 3:39 am

A charged waterbottle bursting will spray that much. There is a minimum mass for nukes to be able to work. About the smallest you can get, is lethal at 300 meters.
User avatar
Syaza Ramali
 
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:46 am

Post » Fri Nov 27, 2015 12:12 am

Except we have working nuclear batteries smaller then your fist in Fallout.

So again, real world nuclear physics =/= Fallout nuclear physics/

User avatar
SexyPimpAss
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:24 am

Post » Fri Nov 27, 2015 8:05 am

Sadly, no!

User avatar
Auguste Bartholdi
 
Posts: 3521
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:20 am

Post » Fri Nov 27, 2015 5:28 am

What??? You mean not firing the warhead farther away than the radius of its fallout is a drawback? It's kind of a nuclear suicide vest.

User avatar
Jonny
 
Posts: 3508
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:04 am

Post » Fri Nov 27, 2015 12:04 am

There is a critical mass, yes, but that mass is not consistent between materials. It is theoretically possible for a smaller, weaker nuclear warhead to be made viable by using a material or bomb design that is more efficient at capturing neutrons. For example, the critical mass of some forms of Californium is about 1/4th of that of plutonium.

User avatar
Joie Perez
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 3:25 pm

Previous

Return to Fallout 4