Open World Looting VS Menu Looting

Post » Fri Nov 27, 2015 11:24 pm

The poll blows my mind. Thought for sure that 95% of the votes would go to the "menus" option.

User avatar
Shaylee Shaw
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:55 pm

Post » Fri Nov 27, 2015 8:03 pm


Same here. I also would have assumed the Bethesda forums to vote fo3 for their favorite fallout, but I guess life is full of surprises.
User avatar
Esther Fernandez
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 11:52 am

Post » Sat Nov 28, 2015 9:22 am


Of course it makes no sense if I were not referring to the poll. The poll is very flawed. From a design standpoint a container is obviously created to hold things. It is just another object of the game world. I will grant you that modders and Bethesda have very good containers with interaction animations ect.
Mass Effect also has containers. They are completely [censored] naturally but they are simply a "menu" container. Why? It isn't for user convenience. It is a cheap budgetary technique and nothing more. Shep cannot drop the gun. Shep cannot biotically pick up said gun and hurl it at someone useless though the endeavor may be. Many developers follow this tactic because it is the path of least resistance and the consumer allows it. That is fine. I can say my piece arguing otherwise.

I have already covered the technical limitations and other areas that make containers necessary. My viewpoint is that they are a mere convenience and nothing more. The poll draws attention into it's simple choices that could infer grave consequences if it were to be followed to the letter. A strict menu based system is complete garbage. An "open world loot system" allows much more flexibility and is not technically impossible to a degree. Bethesda has proven that time and again. So I say again No to a "both" option (it doesn't exist) and a very big HELL NO to a strictly menu based system.
User avatar
Anthony Diaz
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:24 pm

Previous

Return to Fallout 4