Fawkes' ex girlfriend and her teenage love child will come down from the forzen North to demand mutant justice in the form of alimony. Their demand is 1,000 bottlecaps a month.
I always believed the five made one referred to the 5 major "wastelands" of the east, Ronto, The Commonwealth, The Pitt, The C.W., and The Broken Banks, being unified as one.
I predict that Madison Li from Fallout 3 will reappear in Fallout 4. In the Broken Steel add-on for Fallout 3, you can ask several characters what happened to Dr. Li after Project Purity. They say she left the Capital Wasteland and is heading towards the Commonwealth, which we now know is the setting for Fallout 4.
the number 5 will be hard since for what we know right now what happen on NV is on the future, so the REPCONN rockets didnt lunch yet.
One of the REPCONN rockets went through a wormhole and traveled into the past. However, the most important issue is that Todd Howard said "200 years" so it is not known if he was being literal so the events in Fallout 3 is happening at the same time as Fallout 4 or if it was an approximation. So it could be 180 years or it could be 220 years after the bombs dropped. Although, I guess that partially depends on if Bethesda wants the events of Fallout 3 to affect Fallout 4 exactly like how Mass Effect, Dragon Age, and Witcher were affected by the actions that you have done in the previous games.
Khaleesi will return to the mainland with her 3 dragons, only to discover that they have heightened sensitivity to radiation.
I predict
1 that voice acting main character will ruin gameplay feeling
2 You will be "forced" to play as good guy if you want satisfaction end game
3 you will not be able to do what ever you want (invincible characters)
4 less RPG elements (no skills) but more perks witch should be new feature but i doubt it will be satisfactuary at the end
5 more FPS Rambo style
I predict that:
1) I'll actually prefer having a voiced protagonist to inject some much-needed personality into my PCs interactions with other characters and that I'll rather enjoy the cinematic dialog.
2) There will be a number of ways to approach the game.
3) NPCs being tagged as "essential" will continue to be something I don't give a second thought to.
4) I'll enjoy the new Perk system much more than Fallout 3's, as it elegantly provides a wider range of customization options while also allowing for a much broader range of growth without having to worry about all characters arriving at the same end-point, stat-wise.
5) Better real-time combat mechanics, with a marked improvement in third-person gameplay (which is my primary mode.)
Opinions sure are silly, aren't they?
Oh you're one of those....
-on topic-
I for one have given up trying to predict story happenings of this game because one central question exist that I can't answer 100% and that's what year it is. As much as I want to believe it is after NV I have no hard evidence when I really get down to it...
Aye. The lack of solid confirmation on what year we leave the vault effectively blows up the number of storyline possibilities to crazy levels. The year is the single story-related fact I want to know before release, just so I can make some reasonably possible predictions and then see how horribly wrong I guessed.
I hope there are solid factions with completely diff endings.
I predict that you're going to buy the game even though every single one of your posts is about how much you don't like the game, and you will make more posts after you play saying how bad it is.
I assume that gibberish means "Link please, thanks"? How hard is it to write something comprehensible?
And how about not taking the "200 years after the war" literally? Until we see a solid evidence of the exact date, consider it a rough estimate only.
I predict there are many people in here still butthurt they missed out on a Pipboy edition.
I predict that we will get at least 12 more distinct forum topics about the 200 year gap issue.