I would prefer a more open urban area, and maybe more open building that aren't just dark labrynths. I mean really pick one either dark or labrynth.

I love FO3's map but ugggh, Metros. Metros are fine but please make the maps make more sense. 3 dimensional world and a one dimensional map=crappage. All you have to do is highlight elevation. I hate metros but just to make sure you know, I hate metros , oh and I hate metros and metros. Could have worked but didn't in FO3.

Oh , and debris that even I could skip over but my character can't svcks too.

BTW: I hate metros

I see you love metros. They're great aren't they?

I would rather have simply more settlements and towns, but the same sized map.

If they would actually make the settlement/towns good then I doubt we would be having this discussion. 3 people 'towns'? Give me a break, that's garbage to me.

Like it was mentioned earlier, they really wasted a lot of potential on places like Fort Bannister, Evergreen Mills, etc. You should have been able to potentially do quests for them that may conflict with some of the goody-goody towns/settlements. Maybe even join them. I'm not talking about stupid 'quests' like Fort Independence (another wasted area that could have given people an actual choice! with who to side with to shape the future of the wastes. Imagine if they were more than just meaningless targets in red power armor?) but actual branching quests that mean something. It would have made the world seem a lot bigger, imo.

+1

Long story short they rushed Fallout 3.