Question for hardcoe fallout fans

Post » Wed Jun 30, 2010 2:04 am

... that remove much of the reality and realism of hitting moving targets. When trying to swing and point a weapon at somebody on top of you, it should be noted that the cross-hair is your eyeball point of view when looking at their heads, and not the gun-site's view.

Accuracy is also affected by your stance, crouching being more accurate than standing, along with other factors, and should be taken into account. Note also that not all guns have the same in-built accuracy, some guns are more accurate than others, just like in real life.



That last bit will get the canon police down on you!



No one could care less. The Fallout Series is all but essentially butchered canon wise. I just hope the next games just don't svck gameplay wise, and fix some of the issues that Fallout 3 has.
User avatar
Stacey Mason
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:18 am

Post » Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:16 am

No one could care less. The Fallout Series is all but essentially butchered canon wise. I just hope the next games just don't svck gameplay wise, and fix some of the issues that Fallout 3 has.


Was replying to a comment regarding difficulties of hitting targets and why that should be... but ok, you couldn't care less.

Butchered canon wise you say?
The game has an excess of Fallout factors and game/game-play essences (canon in other words) of the previous Fallouts, that make the words "butchered canon", ludicrous.

Never mind, maybe you will enjoy the next one as much as everybody else has enjoyed this one, game-play wise and canon wise, and as I did. A fantastic Fallout 3.

(Canon: general rule and principle of which something is judged :dictionary).
User avatar
Antonio Gigliotta
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 1:39 pm

Post » Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:59 am

Closed for post limit.
User avatar
RAww DInsaww
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 5:47 pm

Previous

Return to Fallout Series Discussion