You make no sense since people are wasting money on this game the way it is. All i'm saying is add more content to make it better, never said make it a clone.
You make no sense since people are wasting money on this game the way it is. All i'm saying is add more content to make it better, never said make it a clone.
I don't like clash of clans. so no comments. And yes. This game could of been so much more. more contents.
Nope, the current structure does not require you to spend money opposing to other games outlined, you can easily get lunchboxes from objectives and there is no rush, since there is no PvP and you don't have to worry about improving your vault in the shortest possible time or buying a "base shield" for real money. You can buy lunchboxes to make the game easier, but there is no point really, since it is enjoyable as it is. In short, I also want the game to have more depth and a social aspect, but without PvP, that's the difference.
By the way it would be very interesting to know how many people want PvP and how many don't:)
Yes, game of war only does well because of Kate Upton *Rolls eyes*. They have a lot of good ideas, let's be honest here. What bethesda has right now is only the building portion of their games. Nothing else. The fact that you guys actually believe Fallout Shelter is better than those games shows your fan boyism. Yes those game are cash cows but they are still 1000x ahead in content than Fallout Shelter.
They are number one because they cater to the majority of what Mobile Gamers (gamers with money) want. It's called Supply and Demand.
Well that is your POV. But I guess i have a different view of my time spent on those games. I talked to a lot of cool people, teamed up with other players to do raids, forged alliances, had epic battles. I'm not saying those games aren't without flaws, yes those wait times svcks but those are things bethesda doesn't have to carry over.