Congratulations on the DICE awards

Post » Sun Feb 21, 2016 12:04 am

As I live in Europea, I don't care much of Hollywood, but I know that Fallout 4 AND Witcher 3 deserve their awards and I will be buying games from both companies whatever price they wins or not win.. doesn't matter. I still waiting for good games from Asia, kind of rpg.


Cheers,


-Klevs

User avatar
Melissa De Thomasis
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:52 pm

Post » Sat Feb 20, 2016 10:34 am

Witcher [censored] are more blindly fanatical than the Children of the Atom. Your game svcks kids, not really a RPG if you're forced to play a certain character - its like playing D&D and the dungeon master forcing you to play a character he created. Bethesda has it right.



I don't mind the Obsidian [censored] as much, they have some valid points, love FO:NV, it does certain things better than FO4, and vice versa of course. M1 Garand Bethesda!

User avatar
Heather Kush
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:05 pm

Post » Sat Feb 20, 2016 2:57 pm

No, it isn't. Just cause it wears the title of Fallout does not make it a Fallout game. Remember that The Burned Game also wears the Fallout title.




Yes, there is such a thing as a proper Fallout game. It's called Fallout 1. Fallout 1 'is' Fallout. End of story. Any game that comes afterwards is never going to be 100% Fallout but it is about being as close to it as possible while still moving forward. Fallout 3 and 4 has moved so far away from what Fallout 1 was that they are not proper Fallout games. Yes, what makes a Fallout game a Fallout game will vary depending on who you ask. it does not mean that they are right though. Just cause Bethesda owns the series does not mean that they get to dictate what Fallout is. Only Fallout 1 and the original developers' vision and design goals get to dictate that. Question is, does Bethesda follow it? Here's a spoiler for ya: They don't.



And yes, I am from "the NMA crowd", why does that matter?



Bethesda didn't do anything to 'me', but they did something to a series I loved.






Pot?

Yes, kettle?


You're looking really black today!



...



That means you're a colossal hypocrite.

User avatar
Katie Samuel
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:20 am

Post » Sat Feb 20, 2016 10:38 am

both games are incredibly great on a different level...


I personnaly love F4 *and* TW3, but I dont play each of them for the same reason.


Too bad, there is only one winner at the end. I would have probably make them ex aequo.

User avatar
Rachel Eloise Getoutofmyface
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:20 pm

Post » Sat Feb 20, 2016 2:16 pm

No, it doesn't matter but you guys have a reputation for having that elitist "I'm right and anyone who disagrees with me is wrong and a moron" kind of attitude and you were starting to act that way so I thought I'd ask. Despite what you and the other people from that horrible place like to think, you don't get to dictate what makes a Fallout game and I say this as a massive fan of the originals.



And yes, Bethesda did do something to the series we love. They pulled an obscure franchise from the grave and actually made it a well known franchise and financially successful, which is something the original creators were never able to do on both accounts.

User avatar
Loane
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 6:35 am

Post » Sat Feb 20, 2016 7:35 pm

Closed for review.

This is staying closed, too many attempts at derailing the thread, flamebaiting and flaming going on.
User avatar
Alycia Leann grace
 
Posts: 3539
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:07 pm

Previous

Return to Fallout 4