just a quick question regarding Detect Life

Post » Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:19 pm

How come the Detect Life effect also appears on undead? (skeletons, zombies, etc) ((at least it does for me on Oblivion)).
User avatar
Liv Staff
 
Posts: 3473
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 10:51 pm

Post » Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:11 pm

Gameplay reasons. Not lore.

...

Next!
User avatar
!beef
 
Posts: 3497
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 4:41 pm

Post » Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:22 pm

"...our world was born from magicka, the creative force that informs and sustains all life." (http://www.imperial-library.info/pge3/arena_supermundus.shtml)

The skeletons are held together by animating magic, making them somewhat magically sentient, but they are not the same entities that contained a "spirit". That spirit returns to the Dreamsleeve upon mortal death (outside of some few "incalculable effort" exceptions).

Magic + will = "life". (See http://www.imperial-library.info/obscure_text/5th_era_loveletter.shtml where it states that "the marriages of the Aether describe the birth of all magic. ...the Aurbis exploded with its surplus. Will formed and, with it, the Potential to Action.")
So why are they called "the undead" then, you might ask?

Answer: because it is the will of either the conjurer or necromancer PLUS the animating magic that give it the similarity to life to the point that "Detect Life" detects it as well.

Hope this helps.


___The Word Merchant of Julianos
User avatar
Katy Hogben
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:20 am

Post » Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:12 pm

"...our world was born from magicka, the creative force that informs and sustains all life." (http://www.imperial-library.info/pge3/arena_supermundus.shtml)

The skeletons are held together by animating magic, making them somewhat magically sentient, but they are not the same entities that contained a "spirit". That spirit returns to the Dreamsleeve upon mortal death (outside of some few "incalculable effort" exceptions).

Magic + will = "life". (See http://www.imperial-library.info/obscure_text/5th_era_loveletter.shtml where it states that "the marriages of the Aether describe the birth of all magic. ...the Aurbis exploded with its surplus. Will formed and, with it, the Potential to Action.")
So why are they called "the undead" then, you might ask?

Answer: because it is the will of either the conjurer or necromancer PLUS the animating magic that give it the similarity to life to the point that "Detect Life" detects it as well.

Hope this helps.
___The Word Merchant of Julianos


So how come you can't detect bound items without using a different effect in mysticism, huh?
User avatar
Emilie M
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 9:08 am

Post » Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:20 pm

So how come you can't detect bound items without using a different effect in mysticism, huh?


Bound items are infused with a daedric "soul".

"Soul" does not equal "Life" because a "soul", by itself, does not contain the necessary "potential to action" requirement.

Souls alone do not have the animating magic needed to be "alive" in the Aurbis, which is why they are separated from "the living" once the living becomes a "dead" entity. The soul exists even though something is no longer "alive".


___TWM
User avatar
Robert
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 5:58 am

Post » Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:04 pm

Bound items are infused with a daedric "soul".

"Soul" does not equal "Life" because a "soul", by itself, does not contain the necessary "potential to action" requirement.

Souls alone do not have the animating magic needed to be "alive" in the Aurbis, which is why they are separated from "the living" once the living becomes a "dead" entity. The soul exists even though something is no longer "alive".
___TWM



Oh right, so what are you saying now? That if a bound item is being used, then you can detect it? Seriously?!

I'd just like to acknowledge the growing desperation of the Lore forum.
User avatar
Blaine
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 4:24 pm

Post » Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:03 pm

No, man. Just that bound items are not "lifeforms". They are just shaped souls.

Skeletons have physical forms and a will driving them (albeit the caster). They qualify as a "lifeform" for the purposes of Detect Magic.

There's a difference.


___TWM

edit: I may have been unclear on the "potential to action" thing. The phrase "potential to action" is pretty much synonymous with free will. The skeletons are controlled by free will, it is just the caster's free will that is being detected. Does that clear up my admittedly muddy water post a bit? :shrug:
User avatar
Richard
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 2:50 pm

Post » Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:36 pm

No, man. Just that bound items are not "lifeforms". They are just shaped souls.

Skeletons have physical forms and a will driving them (albeit the caster). They qualify as a "lifeform" for the purposes of Detect Magic.

There's a difference.
___TWM


They have the will of its user. It now has potential to action. How is that any different from a necromancer who uses his own will to provide "life"?

I get what you're saying. It's elaborate puppetry. Magicka is the strings, the necromancer the master. Is that what you're saying? And it makes it life-like?
User avatar
Sakura Haruno
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 7:23 pm

Post » Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:01 pm

They have the will of its user. It now has potential to action. How is that any different from a necromancer who uses his own will to provide "life"?

Hmmm. I think that the will of the caster operates in a different manner in conjuring skeletons than it does in summoning bound items.

In summoning skeletons, caster will + magical body = [something detectable].

In summoning bound items, the soul (which is undetectable by itself) is shaped into a certain form, but the caster's will is not inserted into it. On the contrary, the caster's will only applies in that situation in commanding the caster's own extremities to physically (not mentally) move the shaped soul, i.e., via swinging, chopping, etc.

Knight Mariel, we both know that there is no official lore that states the hypothesis above verbatim, therefore we must concede that we are extrapolating from what we do have available. The question now becomes whether such extrapolation is something that you will consider and take seriously?

I find myself subscribing to the latter, and I hope that you do as well.

May JHUNAL bless and guide your continued searches and endeavors, for I remain...


___The Word Merchant of Julianos
User avatar
Nikki Hype
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 12:38 pm

Post » Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:16 pm

Knight Mariel, we both know that there is no official lore that states the hypothesis above verbatim, therefore we must concede that we are extrapolating from what we do have available. The question now becomes whether such extrapolation is something that you will consider and take seriously?


Sorry, I won't. I admit though I like your idea, but its application I find not appropriate. However, because discussing this matter is really ridic, I'm leaving this thread...for now.
User avatar
Clea Jamerson
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 3:23 pm

Post » Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:22 pm

TWM: But some enchanted items have both soul and will (see A'tor and other examples), so why we can not detect enchanted items with detect life?
User avatar
Tania Bunic
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 9:26 am

Post » Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:57 pm

TWM: But some enchanted items have both soul and will (see A'tor and other examples), so why we can not detect enchanted items with detect life?


Probebly because the Guild of Mages gets paid per spell effect they teach you, so rather then making one spell that detects everything, they hobble it so that you have to pay them for a Detect Life and Detect Enchantment spell. :P

In the end it's just gameplay but the idea that any thing which is naturally imbued with a soul can be detected by detect life is sufficient enough. So that it doesn't detect enchantments could be taken as a suggestion that enchantments are different from the way things are normally alive.
User avatar
Stryke Force
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 6:20 am

Post » Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:39 am

You see un-, in the english language is a prefix which connotes "not." So an undead is something that is not dead is thus, alive.

Your welcome.
User avatar
Rachael
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 2:10 pm

Post » Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:28 pm

You see un-, in the english language is a prefix which connotes "not." So an undead is something that is not dead is thus, alive.

Your welcome.


Such insight. Such glorious, illuminating insight.

Thank you, sir.
User avatar
Sheila Reyes
 
Posts: 3386
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 7:40 am

Post » Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:21 pm

The "S" in Brian S' name stands for "semantics"....obviously. :grad:
User avatar
Eileen Müller
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 9:06 am

Post » Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:38 pm

Pft, lawyers.

...you bet I just went there.
User avatar
Kortknee Bell
 
Posts: 3345
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:05 pm

Post » Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:41 pm

Pft, lawyers.

...you bet I just went there.


:dancing: . o O (We do what we can.)
User avatar
Monika Fiolek
 
Posts: 3472
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:57 pm

Post » Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:22 am

You see un-, in the english language is a prefix which connotes "not." So an undead is something that is not dead is thus, alive.

Umm... what about the grey fuzzy area where the soul has fled but the body is alive? Like, vegetable.

"You can't prove a negative." I heard that from somewhere... So, you can't say that if is something is not-dead that it is alive. Could could be not-dead and not-alive. :blink:

:ahhh: I need to stop confusing myself.
User avatar
Khamaji Taylor
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:15 am


Return to The Elder Scrolls Series Discussion