What about that teacher who beat the studant with (hmmm I cant remember what it was) yelling "DIE, DIE, DIE" didnt kill the kid, but damn he tried.
Also while you can own guns in the UK, I dont know many people with automatic weapons... So its a bit of a difference. Personally I dont see the need for automatic weapons, for hunting single shot would probabally be fine, same for defence too (I know you cant use guns int the UK this refers to america) I mean if a guy breaks in 1 shot should be enough, you dont need the shoot them 10 times to kill them. I just see automatic weapons as over the top personally.
Also while you can own guns in the UK, I dont know many people with automatic weapons... So its a bit of a difference. Personally I dont see the need for automatic weapons, for hunting single shot would probabally be fine, same for defence too (I know you cant use guns int the UK this refers to america) I mean if a guy breaks in 1 shot should be enough, you dont need the shoot them 10 times to kill them. I just see automatic weapons as over the top personally.
Defensive firing means you keep firing until the threat stops. In most states (recalling from 2nd hand evidence here), aiming to wound (anywhere but head/centre mass) is considered grevious bodily harm. In theory, yes, you should only need one. But what if you miss in your panic? What if your first shot on a deer misses something vital? The follow up shot needs to be taken quickly because that deer will run 2 miles then drop dead in pain. That's inhumane. Semi-automatic systems have been around since the late 19th century. Its a tool, so why not use it?