Fallout: New Vegas > Fallout 3

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:02 pm

Fallout: New Vegas is a breath of fresh air after around 10 years of pretty foo foo RPGs. I am glad to see a game that really hits home on old school "make you think" RPGs. There are alot of things in New Vegas that are straight from Fallout 1 and 2, and I like it! I am sorry for all the gamers that feel that it is not as good as 3 because you can't have a god character by level 15. Nor can you take almost every perk in the game. Again I am so glad to see a game that makes players really think about what they are going to do.
User avatar
X(S.a.R.a.H)X
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:38 pm

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 2:00 am

Of course it is more fun than 3.
User avatar
marina
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:02 pm

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:32 pm

I think most people that love Fallout 3 love it despite being able to be too overpowered, not because of it. Just saying.

Other than that, happy to hear you love New Vegas so much :)
User avatar
Javaun Thompson
 
Posts: 3397
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 10:28 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:16 pm

Yes it feels closer to F1 and F2. A whole lot more.
Fallout 3 feels like a mix between Fallout and Elder Scrolls.
So please if theres a F4 please let Obsidian do it!
User avatar
Cagla Cali
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 8:36 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 6:12 pm

Yes it feels closer to F1 and F2. A whole lot more.
Fallout 3 feels like a mix between Fallout and Elder Scrolls.
So please if theres a F4 please let Obsidian do it!


It's extremely close to F2 if you count how separated the community has become :P
User avatar
Leanne Molloy
 
Posts: 3342
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 1:09 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 1:37 pm

Fallout: New Vegas is a breath of fresh air after around 10 years of pretty foo foo RPGs. I am glad to see a game that really hits home on old school "make you think" RPGs. There are alot of things in New Vegas that are straight from Fallout 1 and 2, and I like it! I am sorry for all the gamers that feel that it is not as good as 3 because you can't have a god character by level 15. Nor can you take almost every perk in the game. Again I am so glad to see a game that makes players really think about what they are going to do.


I don't think it is as good as 3 in some areas, such as random encounters. The Mojave Wasteland is just so damn boring, nothing exciting happens. Its a great game like how Fallout 3 was a great game, but I wouldn't say its better.
User avatar
Ian White
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:08 pm

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:51 pm

I would hope it's better, I mean they did use FO3 as a template, took fan feed back and added their own twist. If it's not better than FO3 then I would feel real bad for Obsidian. Though I do understand that the exploration in this game svcks hard. Thats too bad, they shouldn't have made it an open world if there is really nothing to explore.
User avatar
Nitol Ahmed
 
Posts: 3321
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 7:35 am

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 3:33 am

I actually got kind of emotional about Raul and Cass's stories.


I haven't completed those quests yet, but the conclusion to the bad intel quest at Camp Golf is probably the most poignant moment I've ever experienced in a videogame. Everything comes together there, from the writing, to the voice acting, to how they use something stupidly simple the engine is capable of.
User avatar
Skrapp Stephens
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 5:04 am

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 4:21 am

Though liking New Vegas plenty, I still like 3 even more. Feel free to pelt me with rotten fruit and declare me an idiot and to list all sorts of "objective" reasons why my opinion is factually incorrect, though.

edit: and yes, my love for the third game has nothing to do with "being able to be a god character by level 15", but is despite this.
User avatar
Ross Zombie
 
Posts: 3328
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:40 pm

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 9:33 pm

Though liking New Vegas plenty, I still like 3 even more. Feel free to pelt me with rotten fruit and declare me an idiot and to list all sorts of "objective" reasons why my opinion is factually incorrect, though.

edit: and yes, my love for the third game has nothing to do with "being able to be a god character by level 15", but is despite this.

this
User avatar
Doniesha World
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:12 pm

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 3:30 am

The only issues I have are with people claiming that "Fallout 3" is now "Fallout" when it obviously is not,


Apart from this, I agree with most everything you write. New Vegas is undoubtedly closer in spirit to the original games and it is quite evident that those who entered the series with the first two find it to be a return to form. However -- and this is sadly where we are doomed to disagree -- I am still of the opinion that, for better or worse, "Fallout" is anything that bears that label, that "Fallout" encompasses Tactics and BoS and Fallout 3 and should Bethesda or Obsidian decide tomorrow to release a platform game featuring a Super Mutant jumping over the rooftops of a ruined DC then this would be "Fallout" too.

Why would anybody want to do that?


You might well ask, doesn't mean it doesn't happen though. Such is the way of the internet.
User avatar
sarah taylor
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:36 pm

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:48 am

Finishing the companion quests in FO:NV has been more fulfilling to me than I've had in an RPG in many, many years. I actually got kind of emotional about Raul and Cass's stories. FO3 did nothing but make me slap my head. I can't even begin to describe how much better FO:NV is.


Agreed. Though for me it was Boone and Arcade.

Either way, the writing in most of the quests in this game was phenomenal.
User avatar
Miss K
 
Posts: 3458
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:33 pm

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:08 pm

I like companions like Cass & Veronica more than any companion in any BioWare game since Baldur's Gate 2.

I don't think I would rate the game better than FO3 without the excellent companions and their personal quests.
User avatar
Kari Depp
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:19 pm

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:28 pm

Apart from this, I agree with most everything you write. New Vegas is undoubtedly closer in spirit to the original games and it is quite evident that those who entered the series with the first two find it to be a return to form. However -- and this is sadly where we are doomed to disagree -- I am still of the opinion that, for better or worse, "Fallout" is anything that bears that label, that "Fallout" encompasses Tactics and BoS and Fallout 3 and should Bethesda or Obsidian decide tomorrow to release a platform game featuring a Super Mutant jumping over the rooftops of a ruined DC then this would be "Fallout" too.


I have to agree and disagree with you here.
Take the Alien franchise as an example. Alien, Aliens, Alien 3 and Alien Ressurrection
Every one has a diffferent director, all have a very different feel to them. Some are 'better' than others, yet they're all unmistakingly Alien movies.
Alien 3 has a lot more in common with the original than it does with Aliens, but I think it's going to be difficult to find many people who think it is better than Aliens.

That being said, here is where I disagree,

Alien Vs Predator *shivers* :)
User avatar
Victoria Bartel
 
Posts: 3325
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:20 am


Return to Fallout Series Discussion