Ah, I really should read those then. No wonder I didn't understand this whole Hist business, or where the Argonians came into play. My mistake then
Oh, and if I sound condescending within my post it is by sheer accident, I have no intentions to offend anyone.
strength. Stamina. Intelligence, and brilliant leadership. charm, and good with his words.
Try commas next time
And don't forget CHIM
Darkom95, you say that why do so many antagonists, well that's normally the size of the party in books, I want this to be like a flow blown story, however, still be fanfic.
First of all, I mentioned the protagonists, not the antagonists. Second of all, I am hard pressed to find too many books with a party of six protagonists. I'm sure excellent books like that exist, but I generally find it more difficult to have too many people in one place, especially when all of them are important to the story. Fan fictions tend to be full blown stories, and I fail to see how the number of protagonists changes that.
I love the Elder Scrolls stories and mythology, history, and whole idea, more then anyone else's.
Of course, they are amazing. Simply amazing. I too am a huge fan of Elder Scrolls lore, as are most of the folks around here. And I'm sure you love lore quite a bit, but I wouldn't be so eager to claim to be the number one fan
Regardless, the rest of the idea is sound, all I ask is that you either lessen the number of protagonists, or have them each lead their own story, separate from everyone else. Not to say they can't connect and intertwine, but it would be better, I think, to not have them all in the same place at the same time. You can change the point of view every chapter or so, this is a very common thing done in stories, and is a great tool to get multiple views on the current events.
Thanks, I'm sure the story will be a fine one :goodjob:
EDIT: Regardless, I had meant you should not have them all together. You obviously knew this, but you really should enunciate your ideas more clearly. I hate to sound rude, but my misunderstanding is hardly my own fault, though I do share some blame. Well then, so long as you do separate them then it should work fine.
Tolkien had a very excellent style in doing so though, and you can't really call every single one of them protagonists. I took it to mean you were going to have several protagonists at once, when you really should have at most three, and even then they are usually separate in a sense. Protagonist is different from a supporting character in that they recieve the main focus of the story, even if they are not the narrator or the narrator's point of view, and most importantly they grow over the course of the novel. As cool as Gandalf was, he hardly made any dramatic changes to his personality or views on the world of Middle Earth. He remained static, thus a supporting character, albeit a main one. So you can have multiple characters, but you should restrict your protagonist count. Most stories have only one (Frodo).
Yes, what I said was a joke, though I can't say I entirely understood what you said back then either. Also, just as a tip, please try to use proper grammar, it should clear up some of this confusion. Few people enjoy reading stories written as you have been posting, though I trust if you put your mind to it you could write perfectly well.
Oh, and Vanir, I myself have never heard of such a series, though I trust it is an excellent one. Although I am not sure if all of them met the definition of protagonist, I trust your judgement on the fact.