Things TES should retain from Fallout 3

Post » Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:23 pm

TES should retain what it has always retained from the linear Fallout 3, absolutely nothing.
User avatar
Alina loves Alexandra
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:55 pm

Post » Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:50 pm

No VATS like system in TES plz, just area damage, leg hit + limp/crawl, arm hit makes drop whatever's in the hand...
Speaking of that, make it easier to find your weapon if you are disarmed
User avatar
Eduardo Rosas
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 3:15 pm

Post » Fri Apr 08, 2011 9:01 am

#1 Random Encounters
Morrowind had a lot of quest hooks roaming the wilderness, but they were something to find once, not recurring. In Oblivion you could fast travel everywhere guilt-free because there were absolutely no worthwhile diversions between you and your destination. In FO3 however, there was always some unexpected bit of story or emergent gameplay lurking around the next corner. I hope that in future TES games there will be a deep enough supply of random encounters that I can never confidently say "I have experienced everything interesting in town/region X".

#2 Quests without invitations
In a lot of places in Morrowind and Oblivion, you'll find something cool, with an NPC idling next to it, but you don't get any dialog topic to talk about the cool thing unless you happen to already be on the quest to find the Cool Thing ™. In FO3, if you stumble across something interesting, you can get involved right on the spot. To be fair, this is mainly because of the general lack of factions or multi-step quests in FO3, which is not something that should carry forward into the Elder Scrolls. I hope that in future TES games, if you stumble across a quest objective you will be able to perform the quest on the spot even if its normally in the middle of a 15 quest series, or if that's not possible, at least get a dialog topic so you can find out where to start the chain.

#3 Dialogue trees, not topic lists
Bethesda games have been using a potpourri of dialogue models, where sometimes you are picking from a library of words to ask about, and other times there is a scripted set of actual dialogue trees as seen in classic BioWare RPGs. The proportion has been shifting towards trees over the course of several titles, and hopefully it will settle 100% into that style for the Elder Scrolls. Whatever you do, please do not go the route of having presumably illiterate players pick "moods" rather than actual dialogue lines, as BioWare and Obsidian have been experimenting with.

#4 Humans that look human
Between Oblivion and FO3, someone figured out how to use Facegen. Make sure you don't backslide.

#5 NPCs with lots of personality or none
People with names either have a quest or something unique and entertaining to say. People generically named "settler" are there to make the place look more lived-in. Use this delineation in the Elder Scrolls as well to separate notable NPCs from those that are just there to chat about mudcrabs. Don't skimp on the number of named characters and associated content, though.

#6 Make big cities big
If there's a city of millions in the lore setting, it should either not appear in the game, or take up a quarter of the play area as with DC. Don't mismatch the notional size of a city with its in-game implementation as badly as happened with the Imperial City.


All of it I like.
User avatar
Jamie Lee
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 9:15 am

Post » Thu Apr 07, 2011 4:59 pm

faces
locomotive animation
multi branched and personality based dialogue
stat based dialogue options
random encounters
build your own equipment
stealth (oblivion - assassinate somebody and suddenlly everybody in a 5 mile radius knows where you are | fo3 - can sneak attack multiple targets and stay hidden)
limb damage

things i don't want

item repairing (you can't take two broken swords and glue them together to make it good as new)
User avatar
Peetay
 
Posts: 3303
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:33 am

Post » Fri Apr 08, 2011 6:29 am

TES should retain what it has always retained from the linear Fallout 3, absolutely nothing.

What a stupid post. You're looking at one aspect of the game, and not the many others that will most likely show up in the next TES.

-The new and improved face-gen
-The better dialogue
-Perks
User avatar
jaideep singh
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 8:45 pm

Post » Thu Apr 07, 2011 8:54 pm

Bethesda wouldnt replace their 'level x skills to level up' with an XP system, right?
I'm sorry, but I hate the XP system so much and I feel it ruins the levelling your preferred stats and turns it into a grind-fest a la WoW.
User avatar
Damien Mulvenna
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 3:33 pm

Post » Fri Apr 08, 2011 3:18 am

I'd rather not see perks.

Locomotive animation was mentioned earlier. I don't think it was included in Fallout, but a big yes to that.
User avatar
Soph
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:24 am

Post » Fri Apr 08, 2011 6:25 am

I'd rather not see perks.

Locomotive animation was mentioned earlier. I don't think it was included in Fallout, but a big yes to that.


well it was something similair at the very leasy. animation changes whilst running up or down stairs, whilst in oblivion if you run down stairs you just end up flying
User avatar
Sista Sila
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:25 pm

Post » Thu Apr 07, 2011 7:18 pm

All I have to say is, I agree, especially "#3 Dialogue trees, not topic lists"
User avatar
glot
 
Posts: 3297
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:41 pm

Previous

Return to The Elder Scrolls Series Discussion