Dunno if this was posted already I bet so but I couldnt fint any so I post here ... any comments on this new Blog post?

http://www.gameinformer.com/games/the_elder_scrolls_v_skyrim/b/xbox360/archive/2011/01/17/the-technology-behind-elder-scrolls-v-skyrim.aspx

I'm reserving judgement until I see gameplay video.

There is a topic http://www.gamesas.com/index.php?/topic/1159725-monday-gi-hub-update-discussion-thread-4/.

As long as the CS isn't called the Skyrim Ultimate Creation Kit.

"...Engine and Kit." does it mean we get a Kit too? Screen shot looks Nice BTW

.............I love you Showler. LOL~

That would really svck

ditto

You're pretty witty, I could learn a thing or two from you!

Nah, it'll be the Skyrim Intuitive Creation Kit...

as long as it supports dx10 on pc

at the moment, it sounds better than oblivion. but otherwise i completeley agree!



give game informer two playthroughs with different charecters, a noob that travels around a city and then ventures of into a dangerous place, and a medium level khajit that is a were creature and the time is right before transformation

real time lighting and shadows on everything. snow with independent physics. open cities. animations and faces improves.............much better than oblivions.

No thanks, time to give someone else a turn anyway.

just hoping its not glitchy like the gamebryo engine.

Sounds great but, as others have said before, I'd like to see a video of all of it's components. http://media1.gameinformer.com/imagefeed/screenshots/The_5F00_Elder_5F00_Scrolls_5F00_V_3A005F00_Skyrim/The_5F00_Elder_5F00_Scrolls_5F00_V_3A005F00_Skyrim_5F00_Media/Markarth01.jpg however, shows that at least the game truly looks good.

Outside of Oblivion and Fallout 3/NV, there really doesn't seem to be any other game based on gamebryo that is glitchy. Not many people are using it now that they went bankrupt, I wonder if it was their business practices or Bethesda games giving it a bad name? Most of the things that people complain about are not the fault of the engine. Things like physics glitches and ugly faces/facial animation are not controlled by gamebryo. The physics is havok which is used by many others (like valve for example) without issue, the faces are facegen which is used in other games like gears of war and face animation is a separate plugin called facefx. Other things like it's inability to render environment shadows and create functional ladders are present in games that use gamebryo too. I'm not saying it's an awesome 3d engine but it's totally adequate for this console generation. Blame ugly faces on ugly textures and bad facial animation on the animators. Blame the rest of the bugs on the devs. Srsly

The general consensus is that Skyrim is an enhanced Fallout 3 engine. They likely have enough enhancements to call it their own now, but it's still got gamebryo tech in there somewhere. I wouldn't worry about it, lets just hope it's not as buggy

Anyway if I am not wrong its no more Gamebryo but a propietary new engine of Bethesda I guess ...

im already satisfied and impressed, even by looking at the crappy scans in the gi magazine online. as for the skyrim demo gameplay video, its going to be jaw dropping!