.... I wonder what a super mutant is like in bed. :ermm:

Ask any prosttute at the Cat's Pawn brothel

... I wanna sleep with a super mutant! :ermm:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YFC0O393DQ recommended.

I realised this within my first hour of playing the game. Fallout 3 has a very different, though not necessarilly better, atmosphere. I like both games, but I think I prefer Fallout 3 because of nostalgia. If New Vegas had been released first, I'd probably prefer it.

You get nostalgic over Fallout 3 which you played for like what, a year ago? I feel nostalgic when I dig through boxes I haven't looked at since hte 90's and find the first Command & Conquer (among other old games, like Total Annihilation, Syndicate Wars, Myth II, Dungeon Keeper etc.), a Zelda Game&Watch, trading cards and stuff like that. But Fallout 3 has barely gathered dust on the shelf, you haven't had time to forget about it and then find it again and be like "ah, this old game! Memories are coming back, it's so vivid like it was last year. I remember when I played this on an Xbox360, can you believe that?! Oh, and here's a picture of me, look at that haircut, hahahaha!"

:rolleyes:

I've still got my boxes of CnC and The Covert Missions expansion. Pity they don't work, I just don't have the heart to get rid of them.

You'd think the capital of one of the Great War's main beligerents would've suffered greater damage than that, and have been in a generally poorer state given the centuries of anarchy and neglect. Instead it looked in a better state than most European cities post-WWII.

Not a massive fan of Fallout 3. I hold it in the same esteem as Tactics. For a post-apocalyptic RPG it's grand, and I enjoyed playing it. But it was too static. Too clear-cut. It lacked options. I didn't feel like anything I did had consequences. Plus the liberal goodie-goodie Brotherhood and the thick as pig swill Mutants.. gah. Okay the former can be explained, but the latter just twisted m'nipbles. I consider New Vegas superior as an addition to the franchise.

Yes. I'm a pretentious fan-boy. Yay me.

I prefer New Vegas. I love Western themed stuff so the desert and the Post Apocalyptic old West theme fell in perfectly for me. FO3 was great too but NV is better for me.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klingon

This

But neither exist!

i liked the improvements obsidian made as far as, more quests, more dialogue, more weapons, reputation system and skill/perk/special system, but the setting for NV isn't the best for a post apocalyptic game, the desert? there isn't much there, i want a city to fight and explore in, even better than was done in FO3, but any idea of the game being set in alaska or the desert doesn't work for me, there needs to be a large city, one to rummage through, explore, fight enemies in, as far as new vegas goes, there weren't really any good buildings to explore at all, nothing like was in FO3, the statesman hotel, the capitol building, lob enterprises, the roosovelt academy, red racer factory, the national archives, and on and on, plus the metro tunnels and cave systems were pretty big and fun to explore, and FO4 will have all of that, cause bethesda is into exploring, unlike obsidian, obsidian is more story and dialogue type stuff, bethesda is more exploration and combat. which is what i prefer.

They need to put both obsidians power of Quests and dialoge. With Bethesdas exploration and Combat would probably be the Best Fallout EVER. NV is a great game dont get me wrong but there is probably just a max of 2 places to explore. Also i would rather have Metros than those pathetic Caves i dont care much for them.

oh i agree, i wish they would team up, cause obsidian did do a lot of things right, the factions, better character creation, dialogue, npcs, they brought back the nightkin which was cool, so if they both teamed up together, i think it would make for the best fallout game yet. cause both developers have strengths and weakeness clearly, so if they teamed up it would be the best of both i think.

why dont they team up? Like serously the game would probably get done quicker and be alot better than all the fallout games. I mean what do they take turns of who makes the Next fallout game or something. Like what Cod series does. there would probably be less glitches and bugs. So its a win for all of us. :thumbsup: :foodndrink: :celebration:

i agree epic, they prob won't do that but they could i suppose, with both of their game philosophies, it would be a good game, as it stand, new vegas is a very static map with no random events really and its just not dynamic in the right ways, bethesda is better in that area and much better with exploration buildings to explore and fight in, good enemies to fight etc, obsidian is a better at dialogue, voice acting, quests, combat mechanics, bigger variety of weapons, so if they teamed up it would be a great game, i would think.