Fallout 2, from a FONV/FO3 Players point of view

Post » Fri May 13, 2011 3:00 pm

No no no, we can't speak about him simply because... Tony Jay was just awesome.

It reminds me that he died.. HE DIED. :sadvaultboy:
User avatar
Ridhwan Hemsome
 
Posts: 3501
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 2:13 pm

Post » Fri May 13, 2011 7:25 pm

So we can't speak about him because he was too good, and we can't speak about Fallout:BoS because it was too bad?

Can we only speak about mediocre things?


So, we can only talk about Mass Effect 2???
User avatar
Javaun Thompson
 
Posts: 3397
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 10:28 am

Post » Fri May 13, 2011 1:47 pm

Could someone please tell me what game is not supposed to be named?
The one that had Tony Jay in it and was aforementioned in 2 posts now..
User avatar
Nicole Mark
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 7:33 pm

Post » Fri May 13, 2011 12:09 pm

Could someone please tell me what game is not supposed to be named?
The one that had Tony Jay in it and was aforementioned in 2 posts now..

Fallout: Brotherhood of Steel, for PS2 and Xbox :)

There, I mentioned it!
User avatar
stephanie eastwood
 
Posts: 3526
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:25 pm

Post » Fri May 13, 2011 8:14 pm

Fallout: Brotherhood of Steel, for PS2 and Xbox :)

There, I mentioned it!



Stop right there you Criminal Scum!!!!!
User avatar
elliot mudd
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 8:56 am

Post » Fri May 13, 2011 6:48 pm

Fallout: Brotherhood of Steel, for PS2 and Xbox :)

There, I mentioned it!

Talon Company Infamy gained.
User avatar
Solène We
 
Posts: 3470
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:04 am

Post » Fri May 13, 2011 1:33 pm

Heresy, I went there.


I hereby denounce you as a heretic..

Set the wood alight!

Okay, now we can stop roasting those marshmellows and go back to never naming that of which shall not be named.
User avatar
Miragel Ginza
 
Posts: 3502
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 6:19 am

Post » Fri May 13, 2011 6:33 pm

I am not sure about what you are saying. Are you saying spin-offs are fallout games but Tactics or are you saying Tactics is a fallout game but other spin-off are not. Also are you saying New Vegas is not canon because its a spin-off? I am confused.

All fallout games but one are canon fallout games. FO1, FO2, Tactics, FO3 and New Vegas are all Canon.

Sad news FO3 is also a spin-off for it does not continue the story of FO2. Just because it has 3 next to it does not make it a sequel.


I'm saying no spin-offs are Fallout games and I'm mentioning every spin-off except the one that shall not be named.

Tactics contradicts canon. I'm saying New Vegas is not an official game since it is not called Fallout 4, therefore it is a spin-off but I am not saying it's not canon.

Just because FO 3 does not continue the Chosen One's story, does not mean it's not canon. Fallout 3 references events in earlier Fallout games, but does not change any details of that event. If you said FO 3 was not canon, FO 2 would not be canon since it does not continue the story of the Vault Dweller, but instead the son of the Vault Dweller. Two different people. Tactics contradicts canon since it changes details of event of Fallout anf Fallout 2. Canon is history. Every character has its own history and story. I don't know any other ways to explain it to you.
User avatar
Michelle davies
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 3:59 am

Post » Fri May 13, 2011 10:52 pm

I'm saying no spin-offs are Fallout games and I'm mentioning every spin-off except the one that shall not be named.

Tactics contradicts canon. I'm saying New Vegas is not an official game since it is not called Fallout 4, therefore it is a spin-off but I am not saying it's not canon.

The main events of Tactics are canon, this is confirmed by Bethesda. Spinoff it may be officially, but for me, it is Fallout 3.
User avatar
gary lee
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:49 pm

Post » Fri May 13, 2011 11:54 pm

I'm saying no spin-offs are Fallout games and I'm mentioning every spin-off except the one that shall not be named.

Tactics contradicts canon. I'm saying New Vegas is not an official game since it is not called Fallout 4, therefore it is a spin-off but I am not saying it's not canon.

Just because FO 3 does not continue the Chosen One's story, does not mean it's not canon. Fallout 3 references events in earlier Fallout games, but does not change any details of that event. If you said FO 3 was not canon, FO 2 would not be canon since it does not continue the story of the Vault Dweller, but instead the son of the Vault Dweller. Two different people. Tactics contradicts canon since it changes details of event of Fallout anf Fallout 2. Canon is history. Every character has its own history and story. I don't know any other ways to explain it to you.


Fallout 3 is canon, but it doesnt continues the story after Fallout 2, so is not a sequel at all,its more like a Spin Off, since its takes place in another region of the United States
User avatar
Austin England
 
Posts: 3528
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:16 pm

Post » Fri May 13, 2011 10:42 am

I'm saying no spin-offs are Fallout games and I'm mentioning every spin-off except the one that shall not be named.

Tactics contradicts canon. I'm saying New Vegas is not an official game since it is not called Fallout 4, therefore it is a spin-off but I am not saying it's not canon.

Just because FO 3 does not continue the Chosen One's story, does not mean it's not canon. Fallout 3 references events in earlier Fallout games, but does not change any details of that event. If you said FO 3 was not canon, FO 2 would not be canon since it does not continue the story of the Vault Dweller, but instead the son of the Vault Dweller. Two different people. Tactics contradicts canon since it changes details of event of Fallout anf Fallout 2. Canon is history. Every character has its own history and story. I don't know any other ways to explain it to you.

Tactics contradict canon how?
New Vegas isn't a spin-off really, it's more of a game within the the universe.
More like Fallout 2.5.
Fallout 3 isn't non-canon either, but it's not the third game in the main franchise IMO.
So while it's canon it isn't really Fallout "3".
Maybe if the two storylines connect at some point, but until then FO3 is just a big side-arc.
Canon, but a side-arc non the less.
User avatar
Judy Lynch
 
Posts: 3504
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 8:31 am

Post » Fri May 13, 2011 2:01 pm

Yeah

NV have more references to FO1 and 2 to be considered more than a spin off
User avatar
Gemma Archer
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:02 am

Post » Fri May 13, 2011 10:53 pm

I thought the big contradictions in Tactics where the BoS themselves (like the BoS would even do such a thing with what we know about them from FO1 + 2) and all the creature FUBAR's (furry deathclaws and so forth)
User avatar
He got the
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 12:19 pm

Post » Fri May 13, 2011 6:04 pm

Stop right there you Criminal Scum!!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_2Jduxc2P8
User avatar
Rob Davidson
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:52 am

Post » Fri May 13, 2011 9:56 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_2Jduxc2P8


I love that song!! Why is it with such a boring game like Oblivion attracts the most creative fanbase?
User avatar
victoria johnstone
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 9:56 am

Previous

Return to Fallout Series Discussion