Customizable clothing?

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 8:16 am

as for he who does not believe in stalinism/leninism:

is freedom worth the cause?
is the idea that everything is permitted. worth pain and suffering, if that idea will get breached once you go too far?
would it not be better to limit one's freedom from the start? wouldn't that be much kinder than eventually, without warning, taking away the thing you made them believe they had?

aren't leaders chosen because they are smarter or better capable of leading? aren't leaders chosen because you believe they will make better choices?

then why, why would you object to a government leading everything?
you HAVE chosen them to lead, haven't you?
you HAVE decided they know best, haven't you?
then why do you oppose your own judgement?


Anyone who would say this has no actual understanding of how democracy works, and severely overestimates the rationality of most people, especially in mass form. And yes, to me, liberty is worth "the cause." Pain and suffering are inescapable and always will be. Liberty is the only thing of true value in life, as a life without liberty and the ability to control one's destiny as much as possible is a life not worth living. If you feel differently I fully support your right to enslave yourself to someone else, or to base your thoughts, actions, and beliefs off of what the masses and majorities want. I, on the other hand, will choose liberty.
User avatar
lydia nekongo
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:04 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 1:28 am

right, because you believe it's best.
then give me the freedom to do what i believe is best, putting limits on freedom to stop deliberate hurting.


No one is stopping you from limiting yourself. If you cannot see the difference between the right to limit yourself and the right to limit others, then you have an intellectual honesty gap in your beliefs the size of the Grand Canyon.
User avatar
Blackdrak
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 11:40 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 1:14 pm

I see. So you hate freedom of expression. You'd rather just abridge the liberties of others in order so you might not be offended, rather than simply not play with them. Sounds like something the Nazi party would be into, really.


I sincerely hope you're joking. If you're not, I just lost a little more faith in mankind. I'm honestly baffled that you apparently think it's O.K to be a racist bigot because of "Freedom of expression". So I can burn crosses on my lawn, hang Nazi flags out of my windows, use hateful speech about you and your race / family, because I should be allowed to express myself? Laughable. Words can be just as hurtful mentally, and emotionally, as me punching you in the face would be physically.

To be fair, the Swastika was a cornerstone symbol for many organizations, beliefs, and empires, primarily Indian. That started back thousands of years, and they still exist today. Just because one guy comes in and uses the symbol for evil doesn't mean the symbol itself is evil.


Didn't Hitler change it, though? I think I remember reading about how he turned it a little more to the side. Maybe it's just my imagination, though. :shrug:
User avatar
Wayne Cole
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:22 am

Post » Mon May 16, 2011 11:19 pm

I sincerely hope you're joking. If you're not, I just lost a little more faith in mankind.



Didn't Hitler change it, though? I think I remember reading about how he turned it a little more to the side. Maybe it's just my imagination, though. :shrug:


You'd lose faith in mankind due to someone supporting freedom of speech/expression? That's funny, because I find those that think people need to be regulated in what they are allowed to say, or in the manner of which they can non-violently express themselves, have no faith in mankind to begin with. They are akin to people who think that everyone would just start killing each other out of nowhere were the laws against murder to be repealed tomorrow.

So I can burn crosses on my lawn, hang Nazi flags out of my windows, use hateful speech about you and your race / family, because I should be allowed to express myself? Laughable. Words can be just as hurtful mentally, and emotionally, as me punching you in the face would be physically.


Uh, yes, especially if it is on your private property. In fact I don't know of any laws against such acts in the United States currently. And words can only damage the offended if they agree to it. I don't get a say in whether your punch to my face breaks my nose or not.
User avatar
Chris Ellis
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:00 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 7:08 am

All of you, just put down your troll faces and your flamethrowers, and walk away!

There is no point to this argument and it appears you cannot sway each other, so drop it and get back on the OP!

I'd say, yea it would be kinda cool to add an emblem, but the altercations with just color on an item will do fine, because that still opens up many of possibilities
User avatar
Jessica Phoenix
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 8:49 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 9:02 am

All of you, just put down your troll faces and your flamethrowers, and walk away!

There is no point to this argument and it appears you cannot sway each other, so drop it and get back on the OP!

I'd say, yea it would be kinda cool to add an emblem, but the altercations with just color on an item will do fine, because that still opens up many of possibilities


Ok.

The biggest problem is a selection of emblems gets over used and custom ones have to be vetted and this requires the company to spend money.

Thought I would suggest using the forum. Post a pic and have people vote. Enough Yes votes and it gets sent to a final judge. Each No takes away a Yes and so they don't have to deal with any stupid/offensive ones. Or less anyway.

PS: does this mean I finally get a turtle? :)
User avatar
Nichola Haynes
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 4:54 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 2:27 am

You'd lose faith in mankind due to someone supporting freedom of speech/expression? That's funny, because I find those that think people need to be regulated in what they are allowed to say, or in the manner of which they can non-violently express themselves, have no faith in mankind to begin with. They are akin to people who think that everyone would just start killing each other out of nowhere were the laws against murder to be repealed tomorrow.



Uh, yes, especially if it is on your private property. In fact I don't know of any laws against such acts in the United States currently.



:facepalm:

I honestly, don't even think this deserves a response. I'm not leaving the argument because I'm conceding that you're correct, I'm leaving it because I'm literally at a loss for words, and because I don't want to get the thread locked for going off-topic. The fact that someone actually thinks that's O.K, baffles me to no end. I never thought I'd actually have to explain to someone why this was wrong. A face-palm isn't even enough, I need a face-nuke.

I will wait in anticipation of the day that someone horribly racist against you, moves next door to your house.
User avatar
Grace Francis
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 2:51 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 9:46 am

Now I know you can pretty much make your clothing look however you want.

BUT

Is it (if anyone knows) possible to go into such detail as to create original logos on your clothing?
ie. use letters or emblems if you possibly want to create a unique clan symbol?

ps-i used the search function and looked for "customizable clothing" but it came back empty



So, the thread has become seemingly useless. Not surprising.

Topic: EMBLEMS
From what Ive seen, there aren't any emblems in game at all. Obviously other than what is on the clothing you use.
It would be nice to see some sort of add-on in the future that lets you put emblems on weapons and/or clothing though.
I had mentioned before how Guild Wars had a bunch of emblems you could put on your Guild Cape, which could also be colored.

http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20061123001529/gw/images/5/57/Emblems.jpg To the Emblems. They are all in one image.




- :flame:
User avatar
biiibi
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 4:39 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 11:42 am

Ok.

The biggest problem is a selection of emblems gets over used and custom ones have to be vetted and this requires the company to spend money.

Thought I would suggest using the forum. Post a pic and have people vote. Enough Yes votes and it gets sent to a final judge. Each No takes away a Yes and so they don't have to deal with any stupid/offensive ones. Or less anyway.

PS: does this mean I finally get a turtle? :)


Achievement gained: Turtle :turtle:
User avatar
Annika Marziniak
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 6:22 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 2:01 pm

Ok.

The biggest problem is a selection of emblems gets over used and custom ones have to be vetted and this requires the company to spend money.

Thought I would suggest using the forum. Post a pic and have people vote. Enough Yes votes and it gets sent to a final judge. Each No takes away a Yes and so they don't have to deal with any stupid/offensive ones. Or less anyway.

PS: does this mean I finally get a turtle? :)

This is assuming the forums are a populated as they are now... But then that begs the question, is it a new thread for every emblem or the same one till it's maxed out?

Also people could just say no if they have a biased against the user, and if the forums are flooded with all these types of threads, and not many people are on. It could just shoot down someones emblem even though it was ok.
User avatar
Rob Davidson
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:52 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 2:04 pm

:facepalm:

I honestly, don't even think this deserves a response. I'm not leaving the argument because I'm conceding that you're correct, I'm leaving it because I'm literally at a loss for words, and because I don't want to get the thread locked for going off-topic. The fact that someone actually thinks that's O.K, baffles me to no end. I never thought I'd actually have to explain to someone why this was wrong. A face-palm isn't even enough, I need a face-nuke.

I will wait in anticipation of the day that someone horribly racist against you, moves next door to your house.


Thank you for giving up.

K cool. Let's start throwing people in jail for dropping the N-bomb then. I don't see why you're baffled, I've made my position perfectly clear. Just because I don't agree with something does not mean I feel people don't have the right to do it or that I think it's "a-ok." There's a lot of things people do that I don't like or find offensive. That doesn't mean they should be outlawed.

" will wait in anticipation of the day that someone horribly racist against you, moves next door to your house."

I'm sure I'll just go on about my day, not particularly caring. I tend to not value the opinions of collectivists, and racism is one of the highest forms of collectivism.
User avatar
Lou
 
Posts: 3518
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 6:56 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 12:56 am

Well, there are limitations on the freedoms of speech, but they're irrelevant since the games don't fall under government law.
User avatar
Prue
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:27 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 5:21 am

Thank you for giving up.

K cool. Let's start throwing people in jail for dropping the N-bomb then. I don't see why you're baffled, I've made my position perfectly clear. Just because I don't agree with something does not mean I feel people don't have the right to do it or that I think it's "a-ok." There's a lot of things people do that I don't like or find offensive. That doesn't mean they should be outlawed.

" will wait in anticipation of the day that someone horribly racist against you, moves next door to your house."

I'm sure I'll just go on about my day, not particularly caring. I tend to not value the opinions of collectivists, and racism is one of the highest forms of collectivism.


http://cdn3.knowyourmeme.com/i/3375/original/cool-story-bro.jpg?1244744914.




- :flame:
User avatar
Alan Cutler
 
Posts: 3163
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 9:59 am

Post » Mon May 16, 2011 11:43 pm

I propose that no one be allowed to wear sweatpants in Walmart. It offends me.

Well, there are limitations on the freedoms of speech, but they're irrelevant since the games don't fall under government law.


Really only insofar as it would relate to actions thereafter. Like attacking someone after calling them a racial slur will catch you a hate charge, or the proverbial yelling "FIRE!" in a crowded room (when there is no fire, obviously).

But yes, online interactions and even videogames in general fall under Federal licensing laws and even agencies like the ESRB
User avatar
alicia hillier
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 2:57 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 2:44 pm

I propose that no one be allowed to wear sweatpants in Walmart. It offends me.



Why are you still going on your tirade about this? The argument is over. If it makes you feel better, beat your chest, tell yourself you won. Go make a thread in community discussion if you still want to talk about this, stop baiting people into taking this thread even further off-topic. It's obvious that no matter what you say, you won't sway anyone to your cause, likewise how we won't convert you to ours.

OT: I would love it if they at least had emblems you could make from pre-determined things, like how Halo does it. I'm not holding my breath for it, though. :P
User avatar
brandon frier
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:47 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 6:10 am

Why are you still going on your tirade about this? The argument is over. If it makes you feel better, beat your chest, tell yourself you won. Go make a thread in community discussion if you still want to talk about this, stop baiting people into taking this thread even further off-topic. It's obvious that no matter what you say, you won't sway anyone to your cause, likewise how we won't convert you to ours.


Why are you still responding if the argument is over?
User avatar
Maddy Paul
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:20 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 4:44 am

I propose that no one be allowed to wear sweatpants in Walmart. It offends me.



Really only insofar as it would relate to actions thereafter. Like attacking someone after calling them a racial slur will catch you a hate charge, or tyhe proverbial yelling "FIRE!" in a crowded room (when there is no fire, obviously).

But yes, online interactions and even videogames in general fall under Federal licensing laws and even agencies like the ESRB

Give everyone a while to come to a consensus that sweatpants are measurably harmful or offensive to society in some way beyond reasonable doubt, and I'm sure they'll enact something to stop people in Wal*Mart from wearing them. :wink_smile:
User avatar
Doniesha World
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:12 pm

Post » Mon May 16, 2011 11:28 pm

Give everyone a while to come to a consensus that sweatpants are measurably harmful or offensive to society in some way beyond reasonable doubt, and I'm sure they'll enact something to stop people in Wal*Mart from wearing them. :wink_smile:



Attention Duelists, My Hair has made it Illegal to wear sweatpants in Wal*Mart!
User avatar
laila hassan
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 2:53 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 4:29 am

Right...
User avatar
lilmissparty
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 7:51 pm

Previous

Return to Othor Games