I disagree. While porm does set unrealistic expectations, it wont have the same negative effect where a controling, stalker boyfriend = loving. That will lead to some seriously bad things.
huh ? Disney? porm??? Decades??? Cinderella? what??? :confused:
While I agree with Ratslayer that relationships with controlling, stalker significant others are unhealty, and for that matter, downright dangerous, pron is a little more of a touchy subject. Now while visual and mental stimulation do have their place in a healthy relationship, (god knows I like it) the physical and societal expectations women feel they must live up to, and are for some, impossible to attain, those demands can be detrimental to their self worth.
In regards to Disney, basically princesses must be beautfiul, need rescuing, do little more than be a cog in the machinations of men or evil intelligent women.
Face it, Cinderella was a perpetual victim, she never made any effort to contact the authorites about the horrible way she was enslaved, she didn't seek legal representation to settle her father's estate, and if she had'nt of had her looks, and a magical fairy godmother, the prince wouldn't have givern her a second thought.
Snow White was the same, stupid, vapid, and she should have had the Queen tossed in the dungeon, instead of settling for playing house with seven pissy miners and taking posioned apples from strangers. Same with Sleeping Beauty, same with poor Belle, who actually did have book smarts, but had to svck it up and put up with verbal and mental cruelty due from the beast to her father's pointless [censored]ery. Does Belle persue a healthy relaionship outside the village, someone besides hunterman or the beast?
NO, she falls in love with her abuser. WAY TO GO DISNEY.
I cannot tell you how many arguments I have broken up or mediated on the playground because a group of little girls can't decide who decides the game. One, and it varies, will always insist that is her, because she is the prettiest. and in the movies, the prettiest girl gets it all. Now if that isn't [censored] up. I don't know what is. Females are bombarded with images from the time they are small about what is societally acceptable play, dress, appearance, their insufficencies, and how to achieve acceptability.
Last Christmas, looking for a friend's daughter a toy, I was highly dissapointed. Boys had cars, with roads to build and drive them on, toolkits, bugs, radio controlled dinosaurs, swords, weapons that shot projectiles, machines to bake gooey plastic monsters, and airplanes, plus action figures to round out social development. In short, toys to stimulate the mind, and keep physically healthy.
Girls had dollhouses, dolls and doll clothes, easy bake ovens, kitchens, babyneeds, vaccum cleaners, and cupcake makers. Dress up, makeup, and heads you could make up and put jewlery on. So in short, look good, and perfect your domestic chores early. Disney or Barbie on most of it. What a load of crap.

Legos, kinex, puzzles and games were on seperate aisles.
Emz is correct, Disney and toy manufacturers have been doing it for years, now we have Meyers getting her turn. It's nothing new.
Meyers had no problems finding a market for her series, not at all.
Phlooph is going to save us all as Lady Godiva!