Don't you think the option to use it or not would be much better than being forced to use it?
Obviously, yes. That would be the best option, but it isn't an option with New Vegas, so we are just trying to explain why that isn't the end of the world.
And calling something good doesn't actually make it good either, no matter how much you like it. What if Steam happens to lose all their servers that hold your info & you lose all your games & have to go out & buy them all again because you don't have a hard copy that you can just reinstall the game with?
There is nothing that can be said that will make me like Steam. It offers absolutely nothing good to me. I can just burn a copy of my game & use that disc so the original doesn't get damaged.
You can burn a back-up disc of your games from Steam as well and keep that so the original doesn't get damaged, or you wish to install it again in the future without internet access. You can do all that and still keep your hard copy collector's edition disc in the original wrapping. That's something good for you.
The only legitimate complaint against steam that I've heard is the concern that in a decade or two, valve might go under. By then, though, I most likely would have already lost the retail disk anyway, or it would have been scratched/dropped/degraded to uselessness.
As I've said above, this even isn't an issue or concern. Valve would announce ahead of time they were going under and you could burn back-up discs of every game you have on Steam. Or if you are really paranoid, just go ahead and create a back-up disc from Steam now as you download each game, since that functionality exists right now.
Like i said even if you don't like steam eventually you are going to have to use it or another service like it. developers are migrating more and more to digital distributors because it's a more secure way to make sure their games are obtained legally.
Eventually video games will become like music CD's, digital.
Not just because it makes games more secure from pirates (yes, preventing piracy is impossible), but it also soothes investors and shareholders, and saves the developers and publishers money on stamping CDs, packaging, storage, and shipping. It is a tri-fecta of win for the game companies, so digital is indeed the future. The money points the way.
And if all games do go digital only, we may finally get substantial cuts to the prices of games because publishers won't have to worry about brick and mortar retailers refusing to stock their games if their profit cut isn't big enough to justify the shelf-space. Speaking of shelf-space, digital distribution increases the lifespan of games on the market. How hard is it to find old games, or even PC titles a year or six months old at retail stores? Unless they were the absolute best-sellers, impossible. Steam and sites like GOG.com mean players can once again play FO1 and FO2 without resorting to piracy or ridiculous prices on Ebay.
Finally, if distribution becomes all digital, some developers can do away with publishers all together. Certainly the strangle hold the publishers have on the industry will be lessened.
You can tell it to not patch games, right?
Yes, you can even tell the game not to update before you begin downloading or installing it, ensuring if you are on a dial-up connection you won't have to sit and wait for a 100MB patch to install.
And saying Steam sales svck or are all for bad games is either ignorant or just plain bitter. I guess the Company of Heroes sale they have going on right now, where you get all the games in the series for only $12.50, is crap, huh? You should have the right to play your single player game you bought a hard copy of without having to go through an online authentication, I agree with you. But if you want New Vegas, you can't do that. And attacking Steam just because it is the delivery system for your bitter medicine is avoiding the real issue at hand that bothers you.