My only grudge is against idiots who make ridiculous claims easily contradicted by evidence they ignore.
Yourself then?
Ive not actually ignored any 'evidence' youve presented, ive agreed that under certain situations which you have suggested, then
yes the PA should be lootable.
You seem to have completely ignored what i have said, and ive presented actual evidence* to support that it would be
very difficult to kill someone in PA without severely damaging the PA without being extremely
lucky. Ive even considered methods of actually killing a person in PA without damaging it badly, and not many possibilities came up ~ Thats not because im blind to it, i genuinely want to think of some. But the evidence for it neglects the possibility.
*"capable of absorbing over 2500 Joules of kinetic impact"
"The 10-micron-thick silver ablative coating can reflect laser and other radiation emissions without damage to the composite subsurface"
So i will reiterate, incase you still havent got it:
I think PA should not always be lootable, due to severe damage: But under certain circumstances
(getting lucky) it should be.
What is so offensive about this opinion? What is so offensive that you feel the need to call me an idiot? To be out right rude and tell me to 'shut the hell up'. It seems that the reason you spend so much time under that bridge is that you are actually physically incapable of any form of discussion, and this does a make me wonder why you would even join a forum? You just want to state your opinion and have everyone bow down to it. So now i think you should apply your own words to yourself. That is all.