Presence or not of Game Exploits in Skyrim

Post » Mon Apr 12, 2010 8:26 am

I really hope the jumping on rock exploit is gone. Npc should be able to jump or run away if they can't reach me.

I hope npc react to dead bodies of there comrades or people being killed right next to them.

These 2 things really hurt immersion for me.
User avatar
Isabella X
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 3:44 am

Post » Sun Apr 11, 2010 10:03 pm

Then dont use them.
Do not petition to remove them thereby denying people that do like it the option.
Sellfish.
100% resistance is not a cheat or bug, its an intended game feature.

cheating is not a "right" that's why its called cheating if its an option then yes its an option, but cheating =/= freedom of choice.

its like" I cheat in chess don't deny me the right"... FINE but don't call yourself a chess player cause your not even "playing" the game, playing implies rules and boundaries that "allow" the game to be fun, if there is no chance of failure then its NOT A GAME.

playing a game requires you NOT to cheat its an oxymoron 100% immunity to any damage is a CHEAT in a game where finding ways to overcome challenge is the CORE of game-play

alchemy spam, 100% resist, 100% chameleon.... are all bad things that need fixing, they were not game options, Bethesda was just too lazy to fix them.

now you will say running backwards was not OP, Bethesda fixed it I want it back!!!! they won't bring it back because it was exploitable, also I'm sure that Bethesda will NOT allow 100& resist or 100% reflect or potion spam fest ever again.

I'm not selfish I'm just a good "gamer"

if you want cheats/exploits then mods will be you friends, mod a ring of god and put 100000000million gold in a barrel somewhere and have a blast, but I would like my vanilla game to be exploit/cheat free from the get go.

Merari - You lost. You're the one being selfish. And I would love to see you say the same thing to the devs. They would laugh in your face, literally.
Bethesda fixes problems, and they've already said one of the major problems they're addressing is the bugs and glitches. I think all the exploit supporters will be very disappointed when Skyrim comes out.....
Strongly Opposed.


99% of the time these are not intentional and only reflect poorly on the Developer in review publications. Furthermore, they trivialize the game and make everyone roll the same skills.

Fortunately, they seemed to reduce these exploits, cheats, cheese-fests in Fallout3 and are likely continuing the trend in Skyrim if you listen to interviews. :celebration:


Yep, and the last thing Bethesda needs is their new game being called a glitchy, broken mess after what ended up happening with OB.

Hey, I love you too. :P It's nothing personal, just a discussion about exploits in a computer game.

First of all I think it should be clear that there is a difference between exploits/glitches and broken game mechanics. The item duplicate thing for example is an exploit because it is something that Bethesda never wanted in the game at all while 100% chameleon is a broken game mechanic because it is a legit game mechanic that was so poorly balanced that it's possible to get to the point where it is the same as the console command 'toggle AI' (which would be considered a cheat). Enemies can't see you and don't react even if you hit them with your sword or cast spells on them. The same thing happens if you toggle their AI off. It is god mode and nothing else.

I simply don't understand why people want broken game mechanics in their game. I like powerful end-game characters and I certainly don't want to get rid of the 'special' feeling that you may experience when your character gets close to the highest level possible. But why do you need broken game mechanics for that? And why do you want game mechanics that are easily accessible for lower level characters and put them into god mode? If you don't use them because you don't like them then you don't need them either. If you do use them, why don't you simply use cheats?

Did anyone feel that Bethesda catered to the crowd of 'selfish' players and that Oblivion was less interesting because they removed the intelligence potion stacking game mechanic that allowed you to create potions with unlimited magnitude and duration in Morrowind? It was exactly the same as spell stacking, 100% chameleon or many other things in Oblivion. It would put you into god mode with very little effort. I've never heard a single complaint about that. Yet every 'broken game mechanic supporter' screams 'I want all options I can have, every option less makes the game worse!'. So I guess when they found out they can't do that anymore in Oblivion it was a major disappointment? Seriously? If that was true then no game with a sequel should ever change, they should only add more options and not remove or change anything, no matter how badly it was implemented. We'd still play Arena now with some new things added.

It's so easy to create mods that allow you to become a demi-god (you can even use cheats or simply the difficulty slider for that), but it's so damn hard and time consuming to balance broken game mechanics. So why are the people selfish who want a balanced game while the people who like a completely unbalanced game where you can become superhuman anytime you want are not selfish? Makes no sense to me.

I can accept that for some people the 'don't like it, don't use it' argument is valid. Fine for them. But many people (probably most, see poll results) play games for a challenge. That has nothing to do with the so called 'powergaming'. It means that you use everything at your disposal apart from obvious glitches/exploits to reach your goals. If that is powergaming then almost every gamer is a 'powergamer'. If I play a 3D shooter and find a cool new weapon then I will use it. If I play poker and draw four aces then I won't discard them. It's the most obvious thing to do, at least I thought that until I visited the Skyrim forum. If I constantly have to restrict myself from doing things that would make 'winning' easier then it's annoying and kills the fun for me. It's like arm wrestling with a 5 year old boy. I pretend I lose, but if I really wanted I would never ever lose. There is no satisfaction in that - if I lose I only lose because I want to, if I win it was no challenge at all. If I defeat the dragon king (lol...) in Skyrim I want it to be challenging. I don't want to run around in my 100% chameleon suit and stack a million damage spell on him while I run backwards and jump on a rock so he can't hit me (even though he can't see me anyway...).

Apart from all that it is also an immersion killer. Is your RPG character a [censored] (only talking about the RPG character here :P)? He's a mage, so why doesn't he use spell stacking? Because he's not smart enough to figure out how it works with his intelligence value of 87? Because he has suicidal tendencies and rather gets killed before he uses something as lame as spell stacking?

EDIT: At least no one can say I'm trying to get my post count up...hope at least one person reads this wall of text :P


Phitt is right. Logic wins. It's not opinions he states, but logic and facts. If you don't use them, then why should they exist? And if you do want to use them, use the console or mods.

And btw, I'm a 360 player, and I support no exploits in Skyrim. If I wanted exploits and custom stuff, I'd get it for the PC, because that's where Bethesda WANTS the community to screw with the game. For everyone else, there's a solid, unbroken gaming experience to be had on the consoles.

In a way to sum it up humorously: Cheating is for noobs.

NOTE: See Assassins Creed: Brotherhood for the ONLY implementation of cheats on a console game that I would approve of. Ubisoft got it right.
User avatar
Tiffany Castillo
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:09 am

Post » Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:49 am

Many of the exploits in the games are there inadvertently. Many of them are there because the effects are otherwise useful and there's no good way to stop the use of them as exploits.

I really couldn't care less. I don't use them myself - I'm not interested in making the games easier, but harder

Here's one you didn't list in Oblivion (could well be in Morrowind too - I've never tried), of which I find many people aren't aware - a weapon enchanted with 1 second each of max level command creature and command humanoid makes you invincible. Every fight is a slaughter, since opponents just stand there and let you kill them (with NPCs saying, "Hey, I'm on your side!") I happened on that one just because I was curious to see what it would do. After my character went out and tried it out and discovered what it did, I reloaded the save before he made the enchantment and made something else. I've never even been tempted to make one since then - I just don't see the point.

Some people like exploits. That's fine. Even if Beth does everythiing they can to eliminate the more obvious ones, there will still be some. So be it.
User avatar
Jenna Fields
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 11:36 am

Post » Mon Apr 12, 2010 4:38 am

Many of the exploits in the games are there inadvertently. Many of them are there because the effects are otherwise useful and there's no good way to stop the use of them as exploits.

I really couldn't care less. I don't use them myself - I'm not interested in making the games easier, but harder

Here's one you didn't list in Oblivion (could well be in Morrowind too - I've never tried), of which I find many people aren't aware - a weapon enchanted with 1 second each of max level command creature and command humanoid makes you invincible. Every fight is a slaughter, since opponents just stand there and let you kill them (with NPCs saying, "Hey, I'm on your side!") I happened on that one just because I was curious to see what it would do. After my character went out and tried it out and discovered what it did, I reloaded the save before he made the enchantment and made something else. I've never even been tempted to make one since then - I just don't see the point.

Some people like exploits. That's fine. Even if Beth does everythiing they can to eliminate the more obvious ones, there will still be some. So be it.

Those kind of explits are not nearly as bad as jumping on a rock to kill npc exploits. You kill people from a distance while sneaking and the other npc's never notice. Those are the exploits that need to be worked on.
User avatar
Monika Fiolek
 
Posts: 3472
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:57 pm

Post » Sun Apr 11, 2010 11:44 pm

Dont really care about exploits. IMO for a single player experience it doesn't really matter. People raise hell about levitation being an exploit but I always found it to be a very handy tool in MW. It wasn't really needed in OB but that was due to tech limitations/time and budget/shoddy world and level design.

Unfortunately it sounds like some form of flight is out for V as well. I heard most major cities are in seperate cells. Shame it would be cool to get into a mid-air fire-fight with a dragon :toughninja:
User avatar
Jason King
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 2:05 pm

Post » Mon Apr 12, 2010 5:22 am

Merari - You lost. You're the one being selfish. And I would love to see you say the same thing to the devs. They would laugh in your face, literally.
Bethesda fixes problems, and they've already said one of the major problems they're addressing is the bugs and glitches. I think all the exploit supporters will be very disappointed when Skyrim comes out.....



No, denying people something is sellfish.
Saying you dont have to use it because the game is huge enough to encompass many playstyles is choice.
Im not an 'exploit supporter' by the way. I dont use them. I dont see the point.

I do use a chameleon suit for meta-gaming. It is invaluable for following an NPC around for an in-game week so you can write down his schedule. This is something not possible for console gamers by any other means. Sneaking and invisibility will always cause a reaction from the NPC and then their default schedule is altered by them seeing you when you recast invisibility after entering a cell, for instance.

Im not an exploit supporter, but I am a supporter of choice.
As a random example: I never use bow and arrows, but I dont petition to remove them because they are 'useless' and I dont go on crossbow threads stating 'I dont care cause I wont use them.' I go: Yes, why not?

Balance is all well and fine but there comes a point where a game becomes boring because you dont accomplish anything and never get return for the investment of time by becoming powerful.

'Oh, I found the weapon I expected at the time I expected it, that does 10% more damage on the new enemies that have 10% more health.'
To paraphrase a delicious article I recently read on the matter.
User avatar
Big mike
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:38 pm

Post » Sun Apr 11, 2010 10:04 pm

No, denying people something is sellfish.
Saying you dont have to use it because the game is huge enough to encompass many playstyles is choice.
Im not an 'exploit supporter' by the way. I dont use them. I dont see the point.

Im not an exploit supporter, but I am a supporter of choice.
As a random example: I never use bow and arrows, but I dont petition to remove them because they are 'useless' and I dont go on crossbow threads stating 'I dont care cause I wont use them.' I go: Yes, why not?

Balance is all well and fine but there comes a point where a game becomes boring because you dont accomplish anything and never get return for the investment of time by becoming powerful.

'Oh, I found the weapon I expected at the time I expected it, that does 10% more damage on the new enemies that have 10% more health.'
To paraphrase a delicious article I recently read on the matter.

^^ Agreed with completely. Especially the balance point
User avatar
Kitana Lucas
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:24 pm

Post » Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:44 pm

The "omg 100% chameleon is an exploit" is just wrong. Sure it makes you virtually invincible, but its still working within the rules laid out in the game. Now, if it was capped, and you needed to enchant specific gear, or equip items in a certain order to bypass the cap, that would be an exploit, just like stacking effects from enchanted gear over and over to get 500 agility would be.

The item dupe is a textbook exploit, requiring you to perform actions in a specific order to produce an unintended effect.

As for being tempted to use it because you know its there and not being able to help yourself, I hope you never ned to try giving up smoking if your willpower is so weak. Ive been played OB since release on the pc, but I dont feel the need to turn on god mode even though I know its there.

Player.additem 00000F 10000000

Oops, I guess I just broke the game for some people forever.
User avatar
Ysabelle
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 5:58 pm

Previous

Return to V - Skyrim