Proof if proof be need be : Crysis

» Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:22 am

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2011/03/29/crysis-2-technical-anolysis

Who do I contact for a refund?

» Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:27 am

title of thread makes no sense btw.

» Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:17 pm

title of thread makes no sense btw.
Maybe its and English thing...

» Fri Jun 03, 2011 9:22 am

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2011/03/29/crysis-2-technical-anolysis

Who do I contact for a refund?

It’s quite clear that the development of CryEngine 3 for the consoles has led to a devastating effect on the in-game environments, lowered ambient conditions for both AI and NPCs (inevitably as a result of the 360′s eDRAM chip), and a raise in carbon production by over 300%. With Crysis having supported DX12, and Crysis 2 not even shipping with DX11 support, it’s nothing short of a disgrace.

DX12!

Msivve increase in carbon-footprint

Are you really that blind that you can't tell its a joke

Go watch onion news I hear they are factually correct in 152% of cases

» Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:49 am

title of thread makes no sense btw.

Huh? Why not?

» Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:29 pm

OP, have you muppet even READ what that so-called "proof" had for data?

Wish CryTek could inject people with brains to go along with all those graphics...

» Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:29 pm

I was wondering why it seemed that all the grey tones had such a narrow range and all the green tones had their own narrow range.

» Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:58 pm

-parametric mesh generation
-32.2m pixel spread across a 12 joule range

I think OP fell for the troll. Plz delete thread

» Thu Jun 02, 2011 10:25 pm

i find it funny he was comparing an outdoor enviroment from crysis to an indoor enviroment from c2

» Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:39 am

It's hilarious and embarrassing at the same time to see how many people actually fell for this.