Crytek's executive producer Nathan Camarillo has told GamerZines that Crysis 2 looks exactly the same on PlayStation 3 as it does on Xbox 360, saying that "other than the key prompts you wouldn't be able to tell the difference."

http://www.gamerzines.com/ps3/news/crysis-2-ps3-runs-same-as-360.html

Not entirely true, but definately helps stop the console flame wars

Not entirely true, but definately helps stop the console flame wars
Yeah the only problem is the "Well it can't be using the full potential of the ps3" comments that no doubt will follow, this may not end well!

Not entirely true, but definately helps stop the console flame wars
well pack it up guys

ps3 versions runs terrible compared to the 360 version

after all we had comments such as
Mafia II PS3/360 look and run identical
http://www.examiner.com/video-game-in-national/2k-mafia-ii-ps3-360-look-and-run-identical


http://ps3.ign.com/articles/112/1128511p1.html

http://www.psu.com/Sasaki--PS3-Soul-Calibur-IV-on-par-with-Xbox-360-version--a004080-p0.php

http://www.psu.com/Sasaki--PS3-Soul-Calibur-IV-on-par-with-Xbox-360-version--a004080-p0.php

Not entirely true, but definately helps stop the console flame wars
Yeah the only problem is the Well it can't be using the full potential of the ps3 comments that no doubt will follow, this may not end well!

Ah yes the mythical beast know as the cell processor, often dubbed the "cell"

Its no myth the PS3 is more powerful than the 360, youd half expect it, if it came out a year after.

But what i dont get is why PS3 fanboys seem to think that multiplatform developers should take more time in developing their version of the game (which they already do as the PS3 is more complicated than the xbox) just so its optimised for their console.

Basically when PS3 fanboys cry to developers they dont seem to understand that they are developing it for two other platforms aswell and have this selfish superiority view that their platform should come first when more often than not it sells the least.

And ill bet even without "that" optimization it will beat Killzone 3 in terms of the overall graphical look.
I still hope that the PC version has much much much more to offer than the poor textures and particles in the leak. Somehow .. i have a bad feeling that the "better game " for pc gamers will be a higher res and some AA.
No.. No... they would never release a game that is technically inferior to its predecessor...

And ill bet even without "that" optimization it will beat Killzone 3 in terms of the overall graphical look.
I still hope that the PC version has much much much more to offer than the poor textures and particles in the leak.

Well of course it will look better than killzone 3 because it has so much more detail and textures and lighting.

Killzone 3 has none of those 3 things, everything is very grey and dark and just is very plain.

and now i can sense that some people will start to tell that cryek did not use the full power of ps3 because of MS.360 and other stupid things that fanboys could find...well before you start to say that just think about that the graphics you see in uncharted or killzone is because sony pays them to work only on ps3 kai take full potential of the console...so go and tell sony to pay them for the extra effort and money that crytek must spend in order to see some slighty better perfomarce or be happy that ea (crytek) is not like activition and will deliver a game that it will be on par among the consoles....

Glad to hear that! No more **** port !

why should sony pay for that when i pay for it myself. Do you say the same about PC.
I paid more money for my PS3, hence i think they should take advantage of it.
Anyway i have the And i think it will look great on all platforms.

@ Jimmyboy83

You payed more because of the blue ray device. Not because the console is way ahead of the 360

As long as it plays smoothly and looks just as good as the Xbox version, I don't see what there is to complain about. Despite what's been said by the Dev's, it's probably a bit optimistic t think the PS3 version will be better, but it stands to reason that it should at least be on the same level.. If it isn't it's getting returned or put on Ebay instantly. Have no time for games like Fallout NV, with buggy gameplay.

As long as it plays smoothly and looks just as good as the Xbox version, I don't see what there is to complain about. Despite what's been said by the Dev's, it's probably a bit optimistic t think the PS3 version will be better, but it stands to reason that it should at least be on the same level.. If it isn't it's getting returned or put on Ebay instantly. Have no time for games like Fallout NV, with buggy gameplay.

June 15, 2009

What would you cite as the major performance differences between PS3 and 360? I’ve heard a lot of opinions.

Crytek CEO Cevat Yerli : I mean essentially the game we run is about the same. Probably one’s stronger on the GPU side, one’s stronger on the CPU side, so depending on what you’re doing where, the PS3 does perform here sometimes better, the 360 performs other things better, but overall by the time the game ships it’ll be absolutely the same.

http://www.gamasutra.com/ph...

Crytek have always stated that both console versions will be the same in the end.

Which is good, and hopefully time will prove them right.

Although as a matter of course I find it sensible to largely take what developers say before release with a pinch of salt. Especially with no demo.

Lol it's been proven years ago spec-by-spec that the ps3 and 360 are virtually identical. I assume this was agreed between Microsoft and Sony before the systems came out so one doesn't show up the other. Otherwise it's a huge coincidence and I don't really believe in coincidences.

I remember reading on the forums that the PS3 version has tessellation while the 360 does not
can someone confirm this...??

I'm going to be buying it on PS3 but as soon as i buy a nice high-end GPU I'll be switching over to PC

oh yea...
I've got an i5 650 3.2ghz
plus 8g of ram
No GPU at the moment (on-board -_- )
would it be possible for me to play this on max with just a GPU upgrade?? if so witch one ??
thanks in advance.

some of the posts in this thread are ugh face palm worthy

one with a weaker gpu and another one with a weaker CPU

will some how put out a game that is identical nope makes no sense

and the guy on page 1 saying kill zone 3 is nothing but Grey and dark i suggest you play that single player demo its got a lot of snow hm Grey dark snow i saw none unless you don't have a ps3 then you shouldn't be commenting on it

oh yea...
I've got an i5 650 3.2ghz
plus 8g of ram
No GPU at the moment (on-board -_- )
would it be possible for me to play this on max with just a GPU upgrade?? if so witch one ??
thanks in advance.
No problem with that processor. You should check your power supply.
If that is powerfull enough you can just put in a good graphicscard. Which one depends on the budget you have and on which resolution you play. But for example a GTX 560 is a nice and not to expensive card (about EUR 200) and should do fine on a not to high resolution.
I think you should just wait until the demo is out, then more information will be available on how different cards work on different settings.

I dont understand why ps3 owner keep buying games that have a cd key to prevent them from selling them back lol, thats the major ps3 problem

I wouldnt trust what the ceo of crytek said, the PS3 is a more power full console and the cryengine 3 was developed to use all the power of all 3 platforms so i would expexct to see the ps3 version running much better than the xbox, which in turn will be more profitable couse half of u people have both consoles and will run after the 360 version only to find out 2 days ater that the ps3 version is better, ending up in another sale.

I myself own a i7 @ 4ghz 6bg ddr3 crossfire 5870. and will enjoy running the **** out of this game on fullhd dx11 hardcoe settings. (not braging couse i could buy six console for the price of my pc, but that is what harcore gaming is all about, exellence.)

and now i can sense that some people will start to tell that cryek did not use the full power of ps3 because of MS.360 and other stupid things that fanboys could find...well before you start to say that just think about that the graphics you see in uncharted or killzone is because sony pays them to work only on ps3 kai take full potential of the console...so go and tell sony to pay them for the extra effort and money that crytek must spend in order to see some slighty better perfomarce or be happy that ea (crytek) is not like activition and will deliver a game that it will be on par among the consoles....

That is exacly what Nvidia with the PC version by the sounds of it. But did they get value for money?

As always Game play talks BS walks. TRUST NO ONE! But I mean having a PS3 on par with 360 is not a big claim since the PS3 is a better console.

As always Game play talks BS walks. TRUST NO ONE! But I mean having a PS3 on par with 360 is not a big claim since the PS3 is a better console.

Thats your opinion, I'm sure there are plenty that disagree. I own both and love the 360 community aspect and love the the whole media hub feel about the PS3.

I Just cannot wait for this game, How long till it goes Gold?

I Just cannot wait for this game, How long till it goes Gold?

too long lol

i could give 2 **** less if it looks like the 360 version. that version looks really good. probably one of the most realistic games and best looking games on consoles thus far. so im not gonna say whats better than what. as long as the ps3 looks sharp and most importantly plays awesome, thats all i care about.