Rothken's San Francisco-based law firm filed the suit Wednesday in the U.S. district court for the northern district of California on behalf of Birmingham, Ala., resident Kristopher Johns and other PlayStation Network and Qriocity subscribers who suffered loss of service or breach of security on or about April 17 and 19.
so did this guy actually "suffer a breach of security"?
from the same article...
Late Wednesday, Sony posted an updated FAQ on its PlayStation blog clarifying that users' credit card information was encrypted and there was no evidence that it had been taken. However, it said the possibility could not be ruled out.
So it was encrypted. There "plaintext" probably showed:
(ex.) XXXX XXXX XXXX 6249
exp. date: 06/14
John Smith
Whogivesa[censored] Lane
Nowhere, New Nowhere
847563
(or F3D 7A5 if your a fellow Canadian. I don't know what other countries use as postal/zip codes. I just figured the majority of the forum-folk were American.)
So I think were safe. And I'm pretty sure Sony said they didn't get the CCV number, if they even ask for that. some
people companies/businesses don't.
Other personal information was not encrypted but was "behind a very sophisticated security system that was breached in a malicious attack," the blog added.
"Very sophisticated" my [censored] ass. you trying to tell us the hackers have access to "more sophisticated" technology in order to hack it than your "very sophisticated security system"? Oh, right, I'm sorry, they termed it as "malicious".
source: http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2011/04/28/technology-sony-playstation-data-breach-lawsuit.html