I feel sure Whitman would send Vehk into gales of laughter. I picture him rolling around in a heap, unable to stop himself from giggling. Whitman takes himself most seriously when he's most silly.
In any case, CHIM isn't that. Remember it means "starlight" and "crown."
Okay, D.H. Lawrence then. Or Carlyle.
As for starlight and crown, you've lost me.
To be meta for a moment, it's become fashionable to explain CHIM as some sort of discount Buddhist enlightenment. But CHIM is not enlightenment. Nor is it simply the process of making oneself a god. It's possible to be a god and yet entirely without CHIM. If you were to compare CHIM to any real world religious concept, you'd come closer calling it "free will." Which is almost the opposite of what you've been getting out of these discussions, which shows how backwards the explanations have become. I keep telling you, discard what you've gotten stuck in your head and start over.
So its something Nietzschean like the Will to Power? Or like Sartre is http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/sartre/works/exist/sartre.htm?
Also, Mr. (or Ms.) Allerleirauh, are you some kind of person with some kind of present or past capacity with Bethesda? I only inquire because I saw Michael Kirkbride respond directly to you like he expected you. I am not so opposed to the intentional fallacy that I would give the word of such a person slightly more weight on the matter than the average schlub off the street.