Question about Crysis 3 Psycho and Prophet (*SPOILER ALERT*)

Post » Sat Sep 07, 2013 5:02 pm

Hey everyone Xtrendence here and I have a question about Crysis 3:
As you all know, in Crysis 3, Prophet is the ONLY one with a functioning Nanosuit because the stripped the other soldiers of theirs including Psycho. Now the question is: How did Psycho survive? Because they call the people in Nanosuit walking dead right? Because they can't live without their Nanosuit or at least this is the case with Prophet/Alcatraz. So how did Psycho survive?
User avatar
Kortniie Dumont
 
Posts: 3428
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 7:50 pm

Post » Sat Sep 07, 2013 2:44 pm

Psycho was probably stronger than the others and was most likely driven by rage.
User avatar
Katey Meyer
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 10:14 pm

Post » Sat Sep 07, 2013 11:13 am

They only call "dead men walking" those who have been physically bonded to their nanosuits through the Nanosuit's symbiotic nature, through direct skin/nanosuit fusion (the suit grows into your body).

The Nanosuit is wearable without too much physical harm with a special tight-suit that Prophet is shown wearing at the beginning of Crysis 2. It is not unreasonable to think that all US Nanosuit teams were outfitted with these.

However, even with these safety measures, removing the Nanosuit has been shown to be extremely painful (and in some cases lethal, due to the shock rather than the actual physical harm) through the "skinning" process which Psycho went through.

As Prophet seemed to be able to remove his Nanosuit 2 without many complications in Crysis 2, one would assume that either Prophet's safety suit was extra-special or that it only became dangerous/difficult after a LOT of time (more than the 3 years between C1 and C2, at least).
User avatar
willow
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 9:43 pm

Post » Sat Sep 07, 2013 10:07 am

Or the nanosuit 1.0/2.0 is easy to remove if it's the pilots will? Suit tries to protect the user during a rip making it painful
User avatar
Etta Hargrave
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:27 am

Post » Sat Sep 07, 2013 6:48 am

Or maybe... plot device... hmm...
User avatar
Milagros Osorio
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 4:33 pm

Post » Sat Sep 07, 2013 1:48 pm

Or the nanosuit 1.0/2.0 is easy to remove if it's the pilots will? Suit tries to protect the user during a rip making it painful
Possible. Though I don't know how much any of this would apply to the NanoSuit 1.0. It really wasn't too symbiotic compared to the N2, I think. Didn't have all those snazzy "combat AI", "reflex enhancements", "second brain" stuff.

N1 strikes me as more of a piece of technology than a living suit, even if it probably did have some degree of symbiotic properties.
User avatar
laila hassan
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 2:53 pm

Post » Sat Sep 07, 2013 4:59 pm

N1 strikes me as more of a piece of technology than a living suit, even if it probably did have some degree of symbiotic properties.

Sorry, you only specified the 2.0 as 'The Nanosuit'. I wouldn't think it's too different, it's all up to the user if he/she wants to take off the suit, if the procedure is anything like the tasers in Crysis Warhead then it must be painful? I mean wasn't Psycho wearing a 1.0? Or did they all upgrade?

User avatar
BrEezy Baby
 
Posts: 3478
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:22 am

Post » Sat Sep 07, 2013 9:31 am

N1 strikes me as more of a piece of technology than a living suit, even if it probably did have some degree of symbiotic properties.

Sorry, you only specified the 2.0 as 'The Nanosuit'

There's nothing to be sorry about, I was not rebutting your suggestion! Just commenting on how the Nanosuit was originally portrayed as more of a "tech tool" in Crysis and Warhead.
User avatar
Daniel Holgate
 
Posts: 3538
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 1:02 am


Return to Crysis