2 Questions-Dnt think ive seen them on here

Post » Fri May 28, 2010 11:47 am

I have to continue to address your questions about my intentions. It seemed to me that you got agro by my response, and I'm not sitting here trolling, and I didn't want to seem like a troll, so I tried to even things out by being sincere.

If you read the previous pages you'll be able to see how reasonable he is. Your sincerity will do nothing for you here.
User avatar
Mackenzie
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:18 pm

Post » Fri May 28, 2010 8:53 pm

its my thread yet i can not say please let it die? I dont understand that logic. you do remember that i created it? its a mess as it is, its not going to get cleaned up, and i would prefer to have it just drop. But apparently i cant even allow my own thread to die.

and Defend your really starting trouble again for really no reason whatsoever. what happened to walk away?
User avatar
kevin ball
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 10:02 pm

Post » Fri May 28, 2010 4:24 pm

This thread should be remanded in the name of settling once and for all the trial of Eleanor Rigby the Third.

I submit to you, noble jury, that it was a justifiable homicide. In a moment of passion the widow Rigby struck down her husband upon finding him in bed with none other than - that's right - Mint Chocolate Chip! That [censored].

Hasn't the widow Rigby suffered enough? Going home to see her husband in bed, engaged in sixual congress with Mint Chocolate Chip? And now a widow?

The defense moves Rigby be found Not Guilty by reason of Mint Chocolate Chip being a [censored] and encourages the jury to instead enjoy Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough, although not in a sixual way. Unless one really wants to, in which case who is the defense to judge?

The defense rests.
User avatar
Floor Punch
 
Posts: 3568
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:18 am

Post » Fri May 28, 2010 10:49 pm

its my thread yet i can not say please let it die? I dont understand that logic. you do remember that i created it? its a mess as it is, its not going to get cleaned up, and i would prefer to have it just drop. But apparently i cant even allow my own thread to die.

and Defend your really starting trouble again for really no reason whatsoever. what happened to walk away?

Actually you can't do much, it's a public forum and nobody owns the internet. Until it's formally locked people can post if they want.

And hey, I only stepped in because you were being unfair on coolkid, hopefully you can atleast see that.
User avatar
Lynette Wilson
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 4:20 pm

Post » Fri May 28, 2010 10:57 pm

Remanded I Say!

Re - Man - Ded!
User avatar
I’m my own
 
Posts: 3344
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 2:55 am

Post » Sat May 29, 2010 12:37 am

i wasnt unfair, i even said thanks for attempting to be constructive, and i even said please while asking him to let it die. i wasnt appreciative of his first response but i never once was impolite, i even controlled myself. i was actually completely fair. i understand the internet is public, but when one asks that there thread to be allowed to die, i would hope people would respect that. but alas as always i must be wrong again, because I Sdroll117 is always wrong on the fallout forums.
User avatar
Alexander Horton
 
Posts: 3318
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:19 pm

Post » Sat May 29, 2010 3:18 am

Remanded I Say!

Re - Man - Ded!

I've taken chocolate chip into custard-y.
User avatar
Laura-Jayne Lee
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 4:35 pm

Post » Fri May 28, 2010 10:09 pm

Remanded I Say!

Re - Man - Ded!

Man, are you on tons of drugs or just being funny?
User avatar
Gavin Roberts
 
Posts: 3335
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:14 pm

Post » Sat May 29, 2010 1:19 am

hes being really really funny
User avatar
Peter lopez
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:55 pm

Post » Sat May 29, 2010 3:57 am

Custard-y......

I bequeath one internets to you, Sir Fold
User avatar
jessica robson
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:54 am

Post » Fri May 28, 2010 12:50 pm

i wasnt unfair, i even said thanks for attempting to be constructive, and i even said please while asking him to let it die. i wasnt appreciative of his first response but i never once was impolite, i even controlled myself. i was actually completely fair. i understand the internet is public, but when one asks that there thread to be allowed to die, i would hope people would respect that. but alas as always i must be wrong again, because I Sdroll117 is always wrong on the fallout forums.

Hey come on now, atleast let us be civil. I didn't say that and you may have taken this a bit out of context.
And yes, but you have to admit you could have put it across a little easier.
Seriously man no conflict now, I'm saying nothing provocative.

I bequeath one internets to you, Sir Fold

I, a knight of the round tablecloth accept this internets.
User avatar
Lovingly
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 6:36 am

Post » Fri May 28, 2010 9:06 pm

Neigh, certainly nothing as provocative as the scene poor Eleanor Rigby the Third saw that horrible day when she returned home to find her husband in the passionate sticky throws of love with Mint Chocolate Chip!

Don't judge her! Leave Eleanor Rigby alone! Leave her alone!




You're all a bunch of Mint Chocolate Chips.
User avatar
Jennifer Rose
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:54 pm

Post » Fri May 28, 2010 6:56 pm

Hey come on now, atleast let us be civil. I didn't say that and you may have taken this a bit out of context.
And yes, but you have to admit you could have put it across a little easier.
Seriously man no conflict now, I'm saying nothing provocative.



I think civil with us is a little out of the question. this is the first post uve made that didnt undermine me in someway. And idk how easier i couldve put it off.

"Please kind sir, would you pretty please wit suger on top not post a reply to my thread? i dont mean to be rude, but i would completely and utterly appreciate it if you would allow this thread too slowly die off into the nether pages of the forums. please sir, u would have my undying gratitude."

better?

please ignore every other post ive made and just read that above line. if that puts mint chocolate chip and cookie dough at peace, then it will be worth it.
User avatar
Ashley Hill
 
Posts: 3516
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 5:27 am

Post » Fri May 28, 2010 2:09 pm

I think civil with us is a little out of the question. this is the first post uve made that didnt undermine me in someway. And idk how easier i couldve put it off.

"Please kind sir, would you pretty please wit suger on top not post a reply to my thread? i dont mean to be rude, but i would completely and utterly appreciate it if you would allow this thread too slowly die off into the nether pages of the forums. please sir, u would have my undying gratitude."

better?

please ignore every other post ive made and just read that above line. if that puts mint chocolate chip and cookie dough at peace, then it will be worth it.

With us? We don't have some long history :laugh: we've disagreed once, of course we can be civil.

The disagreement probably became a misunderstanding somewhere down the line.

Edit: You have to admit this could be taken the wrong way
"please do not ressurect clearly MARKED dead threads.
im trying really hard not to insult at your first quote. you have no idea. "
I wasn't just making unfounded accusations, don't worry, let us all just relax.
User avatar
BRAD MONTGOMERY
 
Posts: 3354
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 10:43 pm

Post » Fri May 28, 2010 10:49 pm

With us? We don't have some long history :laugh: we've disagreed once, of course we can be civil.

The disagreement was probably became a misunderstanding somewhere down the line.


Yes....yes....now you can reunite against the real enemy.

http://foodbeast.com/content/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/mint-chocolate-chip-icecream.jpg

That [censored].
User avatar
Paula Ramos
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 5:43 am

Post » Fri May 28, 2010 7:30 pm

twice. once before. and once now when u began undermining me again with that coolkididkhis name guy that posted on my thread. i would be civil if not for the fact that ur mint choclate chipness has invaded my cookie dough boundaries and inflicted abominations of mint cookie dough creations.

in other words: if ur gonna randomly do that, im not gonna play nice. And if u keep saying im insulting u all the time same result. i wanted this argument to die a while ago.

a fight on a FO forum thread is kind of ludicrous in my opinion. i liked u at first.

edit: the whole thing was basically a misunderstanding of eachother the whole way iirc.

edit: im not saying that u couldnt understand me. dont take it wrong.
User avatar
Haley Merkley
 
Posts: 3356
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 12:53 pm

Post » Fri May 28, 2010 8:19 pm

Tomorrow, when some mod sees this, I just hope he or she places the blame on right individual, that [censored] [censored] mint chocolate chip.

and please don't ban me for excessive stupididity, or stupidity either.
User avatar
Stephanie Valentine
 
Posts: 3281
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 2:09 pm

Post » Fri May 28, 2010 4:26 pm

Mistohr Smayl, you certainly seem to be killing it with fire. :flamethrower:

God's speed. :thumbsup:
User avatar
Khamaji Taylor
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:15 am

Post » Fri May 28, 2010 11:57 pm

Mistohr Smayl, you certainly seem to be killing it with fire. :flamethrower:

God's speed. :thumbsup:



hes saved my ass many a time. and i think he knows it.
User avatar
Anthony Santillan
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 6:42 am

Post » Fri May 28, 2010 5:25 pm

twice. once before. and once now when u began undermining me again with that coolkididkhis name guy that posted on my thread. i would be civil if not for the fact that ur mint choclate chipness has invaded my cookie dough boundaries and inflicted abominations of mint cookie dough creations.

in other words: if ur gonna randomly do that, im not gonna play nice. And if u keep saying im insulting u all the time same result. i wanted this argument to die a while ago.

a fight on a FO forum thread is kind of ludicrous in my opinion. i liked u at first.

edit: the whole thing was basically a misunderstanding of eachother the whole way iirc.


I didn't undermine you with coolkid, I was just sticking up for him man, nothing wrong with that. And I didn't say you insulted me :laugh: I want this argument to die now, but through resolution not ignorance.
Tbh if we did both go back and read what's been said it would seem like a whole load of fuss over nothing, e.g. I never actually did suggest you live off of games like CoD.

Tomorrow, when some mod sees this, I just hope he or she places the blame on right individual, that [censored] [censored] mint chocolate chip.

and please don't ban me for excessive stupididity, or stupidity either.

Maybe we should just blitz all our off topic posts.
User avatar
Fam Mughal
 
Posts: 3468
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 3:18 am

Post » Sat May 29, 2010 5:34 am

and erase the legacy of CCCD v.s. MCC? Never.
User avatar
Adam Kriner
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 2:30 am

Post » Fri May 28, 2010 6:13 pm

I didn't undermine you with coolkid, I was just sticking up for him man, nothing wrong with that. And I didn't say you insulted me :laugh: I want this argument to die now, but through resolution not ignorance.
Tbh if we did both go back and read what's been said it would seem like a whole load of fuss over nothing, e.g. I never actually did suggest you live off of games like CoD.


Maybe we should just blitz all our off topic posts.



truce? :foodndrink:

and how would we do that? unless we.... :obliviongate: then :bolt: to the mods and :bowdown: so they can say :cookie: and give me a permanent ban as they said if i made one more mistake id be permanent banned then id be home alone on my laptop reading posts while i :violin: and :sad:
User avatar
Jay Baby
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 12:43 pm

Post » Fri May 28, 2010 4:14 pm

and erase the legacy of CCCD v.s. MCC? Never.

'Tiz a funeral pyre we shall all build for ourselves afterall m'lud.

The whole load of smileys :laugh:

Are you seriously one away from perm ban :huh:
User avatar
Bellismydesi
 
Posts: 3360
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 7:25 am

Post » Fri May 28, 2010 2:43 pm

um im 25% warn and leydenne? said if i did anything she/he would perm ban me.

Probably wasn't best to have a raging argument throughout most of the section was it :rofl:
User avatar
Kat Lehmann
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 6:24 am

Post » Sat May 29, 2010 5:51 am

One hopes the goodness that is Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough is enough to supplant the arguments seen in this topic and, of course, the dastardly evils of Mint Chocolate Chip and his Legion of Crappy Flavors.

Edit: I can no longer abbreviate Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough, it's goodness allows no abbreviations or acronyms.
User avatar
carla
 
Posts: 3345
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 8:36 am

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout: New Vegas