In Sermon 2, I'm completely puzzled by
'God hath three keys; of birth, of machines, and of the words between.'
Within this Sermon the wise may find one half of these keys.
And in Sermon 3, I don't understand
They're listing the Aedra, but exclude Dibella and Zenithar in favor of Nirn and Lorkhan. Why is that?
Then Sermon 10
We pledge ourselves to you, the Frame-maker, the Scarab: a world for us to love you in, a cloak of dirt to cherish. Betrayed by your ancestors when you were not even looking. Hoary Magnus and his ventured opinions cannot sway the understated, a trick worthy of the always satisfied. A short season of towers, a rundown absolution, and what is this, what is this but fire under your eyelid?
Shift ye in your skin, I say to the Trinimac-eaters. Pitch your voices into the color of bruise. Divide ye like your enemies, in Houses, and lay your laws in set sequence from the center, again like the enemy Corners of the House of Troubles, and see yourself thence as timber, or mud-slats, or sheets of resin. Then do not divide, for yet is the stride of SITHISIT quicker than the rush of enemies, and He will sunder the whole for the sake of a shingle.
For we go different, and in thunder. SITHISIT is the start of all true Houses, built against stasis and lazy slaves. Turn from your predilections, broken like false maps. Move and move like this. Quicken against false fathers, mothers left in corners weeping for glass and rain. Stasis asks merely for nothing, for itself, which is nothing, as you were in the eight everlasting imperfections.
So the latter is something Boethiah said? He's clearly referring to Lorkhan and the creation of Mundus in the first paragraph, but I don't comprehend anything after that, like Magnus not swaying the understated, and short seasons of towers.
The Trinimac-eaters are the daedra I suppose?
That bit at the end about stasis and eight everlasting imperfections; that's referring to the Anuic nature of the Aedra?
I really don't get what's being said. Is it some sort of inspirational speech given to the daedra against the aedra? I'm not sure that's it, but even if it is, what's the significance of it within the sermon?
That's all for now, any explanations and insights would be greatly appreciated.