I'm quite surprised at the amount of Enclave supporters ther

Post » Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:06 am

Well not really, "one but-hurt experience with super mutants" would reference, to me at least, the time they actually fought super mutants. Everything else I said still stands.


What confuses me about that is, was Mariposa really a defeat? Sure they fought mutants there and sure they were forced out of the base....but from that battle they were able to devise a way to kill all mutants....

seems like a "butt-hurt" to the mutants really shdowhunt60... :dry:
User avatar
Ian White
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:08 pm

Post » Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:05 am

What confuses me about that is, was Mariposa really a defeat? Sure they fought mutants there and sure they were forced out of the base....but from that battle they were able to devise a way to kill all mutants....

seems like a "butt-hurt" to the mutants really shdowhunt60... :dry:



What gets me is... they weren't even forced from the base by -mutants-. Not -the- mutants anyway.


They were ALREADY there looking for something to help them wipe out the mutants so that they could rebuild. The mutants they DID encounter were actually the very slaves they brought along with them to dig the place out and explore it! There was no incident at Mariposa of 'Oooh... we got our asses handed to us by big green dudes'. It was a REBELLION... because they kept on using the Super Mutants as -slaves- even after they had become too many and powerful to handle.

The Enclave didn't -decide- to wipe out the mutants because of Mariposa. They were already planning to... because mutants are a threat. Says so right in the holodisks. What they found there gave them the MEANS to kill them.


Don't get me wrong... I still think it was a stupid idea, on Richardson's behalf. The very act of releasing that modified virus would have wiped out not only all mutation... but everything in the ecosystem as well. No plants or animals would have survived, either.

Then again, as we all know, the Oil Rig had a GECK on board.
User avatar
Nicole Kraus
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:34 pm

Post » Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:43 pm

Well not really, "one but-hurt experience with super mutants" would reference, to me at least, the time they actually fought super mutants. Everything else I said still stands.


They killed vault dwellers, even though they were pure. And genociding other human races just because they were different sounds pretty racist to me.
User avatar
Gracie Dugdale
 
Posts: 3397
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:02 pm

Post » Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:33 pm

No plants or animals would have survived, either.


Just a quick question about that. I thought that the FEV-Curling virus was only designed to wipe out humans and humaniod-mutants. Wouldn't the plant life still be intact? I think some of the animal life would be as well.

They killed vault dwellers, even though they were pure. And genociding other human races just because they were different sounds pretty racist to me.


oh for the love of....tell me one instance where the Enclave kills based on race. JUST ONE.

You won't because you can't, they don't descriminate based on race "mutation" is not a race of humanity.

They ARE NOT racists.
User avatar
matt oneil
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 12:54 am

Post » Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:28 am

The eyebots played "The Marine Corps Hymn" .Anybody that does that cant be all bad.
User avatar
Angela Woods
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:15 pm

Post » Sat Jan 02, 2010 12:43 am

Just a quick question about that. I thought that the FEV-Curling virus was only designed to wipe out humans and humaniod-mutants. Wouldn't the plant life still be intact? I think some of the animal life would be as well.



oh for the love of....tell me one instance where the Enclave kills based on race? JUST ONE.

You won't because you can't, they don't descriminate based on race "mutation" is not a race of humanity.

They ARE NOT racists.


Correct, it would leave the environment intact, only humaniod lifeforms would be affected.
User avatar
Strawberry
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 11:08 am

Post » Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:51 pm

Just a quick question about that. I thought that the FEV-Curling virus was only designed to wipe out humans and humaniod-mutants. Wouldn't the plant life still be intact? I think some of the animal life would be as well.



oh for the love of....tell me one instance where the Enclave kills based on race. JUST ONE.

You won't because you can't, they don't descriminate based on race "mutation" is not a race of humanity.

They ARE NOT racists.


There needs to be mutation in order to another race to be born. :grad: You can actually convince their lead scientist at the Oil Rig that what they are doing is just a genocide fueled by racism.
User avatar
Joe Alvarado
 
Posts: 3467
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 11:13 pm

Post » Fri Jan 01, 2010 3:46 pm

There needs to be mutation in order to another race to be born. :grad: You can actually convince their lead scientist at the Oil Rig that what they are doing is just a genocide fueled by racism.


It's more about evolution really though isn't it.
User avatar
Robert Jr
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:49 pm

Post » Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:03 pm

It's more about evolution really though isn't it.


I'm late in this, but are you guys argueing about them being 'racists'?

If thats the case, then is the Enclave is trying to restore the Human race to being 'human', by wiping out something like the Mutants due to them being a threat to the restoration?

Or am I COMPLETELY off this discussion?
User avatar
Latisha Fry
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 6:42 am

Post » Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:55 pm

It's more about evolution really though isn't it.

I don't get what you are trying to say.
User avatar
Danii Brown
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:13 am

Post » Sat Jan 02, 2010 4:54 am

It's more about evolution really though isn't it.


exactly. I wouldn't call it a "mutation" because that has alot of stigma associated with it and saying "mutation" is what causes races is actually sorta racist in and of itself as its implying that there is something wiered and different about people of different races.

In reality there is more genetic similarity between Africans and white Englishmen than there is between white Englishmen themselves. The term "race" really means jack squat. Sure I suppose mutation could be a way to describe how certain unique traits in species are formed and how those traits are eventually passed on. But thats not a "mutation" in the Fallout sense of the word.

But enough about that.

I thought that when you "convince" the scienists at the Oil Rig. They fact that you mentioned racism was a mistake on the developers part and bad writing. Its not racism if they don't distinguish based on "race".

People dipped in FEV and mutated through radiation wouldn't be a "race" of humanity because they arn't human....
User avatar
Richard Dixon
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 1:29 pm

Post » Sat Jan 02, 2010 4:15 am

I don't get what you are trying to say.


No what I mean is the way the Chosen One puts it to Curling, from what I remember he describes it as the Enclave being backward and not considering evolution and not as the Enclave being racist.
User avatar
Katy Hogben
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:20 am

Post » Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:30 pm

exactly. I wouldn't call it a "mutation" because that has alot of stigma associated with it and saying "mutation" is what causes races is actually sorta racist in and of itself as its implying that there is something weired and different about people of different races.

In reality there is more genetic similarity between Africans and white Englishmen than there is between white Englishmen themselves. The term "race" really means jack squat.

But enough about that.

I thought that when you "convince" the scienists at the Oil Rig. They fact that you mentioned racism was a mistake on the developers part and bad writing. Its not racism if they don't distinguish based on "race".

People dipped in FEV and mutated through radiation wouldn't be a "race" of humanity because they arn't human....

Is it racist to say that mutation is the cause of blue eyes or blonde hair or black skin? Because it's a scientific fact. And as you already said, there is basically only one human race at the moment, but in fallout universe, there actually are multiple human races. And if killing them because they are of different race isn't racism I don't know what is.
User avatar
Emily Shackleton
 
Posts: 3535
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:36 am

Post » Sat Jan 02, 2010 12:37 am

Is it racist to say that mutation is the cause of blue eyes or blonde hair or black skin? Because it's a scientific fact. And as you already said, there is basically only one human race at the moment, but in fallout universe, there actually are multiple human races. And if killing them because they are of different race isn't racism I don't know what is.

Ghouls are not human, they 'were' but are not anymore.

Supermutants are a new race.

Okay, this is what i'm seeing from one of your posts: If a hunter kills a deer it's racist, because a deer is a different race?
User avatar
Kanaoka
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 2:24 pm

Post » Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:28 pm

Is it racist to say that mutation is the cause of blue eyes or blonde hair or black skin? Because it's a scientific fact.


No, it the scientific community that is not racist. But if you are one race and tell someone of another race that their "differences" are caused by mutation. It would likely be seen as offensive if that person does not quite understand what you mean.

there actually are multiple human races. And if killing them because they are of different race isn't racism I don't know what is.


But you are still defining them as humans, which I would say is a stretch because I would imagine that there is very little left in their DNA which is still "human". If nothing else, mutants which have gone "feral" (DC supermutants) have lost their humanity in other ways (eating and killing their own kind, plus they say "KILL HUMANS" in their dialouge..)

Really what we're arguing here is a question of a definition of the word "race" and "racist". Which in and of itself is sort of a pointless debate so how about a truce? :thumbsup:
User avatar
Esther Fernandez
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 11:52 am

Post » Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:35 am

Ghouls are not human, they 'were' but are not anymore.

Supermutants are a new race.

Okay, this is what i'm seeing from one of your posts: If a hunter kills a deer it's racist, because a deer is a different race?

Just because their faces melted off they are no longer human?

Yup, pretty much.

What I'm saying is that even though they aren't prime normals, they are still humans. And killing them for that is considered racist atleast in the world I'm living in.
User avatar
Sammykins
 
Posts: 3330
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:48 am

Post » Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:14 pm

Guys the Enclave wants to kill all the mutants, ie, everyone including the wastelanders. It is a war of eugenics, does that still count as racism?
User avatar
Sudah mati ini Keparat
 
Posts: 3605
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:14 pm

Post » Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:56 am

Just because their faces melted off they are no longer human?

Yup, pretty much.

What I'm saying is that even though they aren't prime normals, they are still humans. And killing them for that is considered racist atleast in the world I'm living in.


They are just a shell of what once was, they arn't human anymore.

You see, we arn't talking about 'our' world, we are talking about it from the perspective of the game world, the Ghouls and Supermutants wouldn't register as a human if we were in the Fallout universe.
User avatar
Kirsty Wood
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:41 am

Post » Sat Jan 02, 2010 6:37 am

They are just a shell of what once was, they arn't human anymore.

You see, we arn't talking about 'our' world, we are talking about it from the perspective of the game world, the Ghouls and Supermutants wouldn't register as a human if we were in the Fallout universe.


Edit, I misread.

That's still racist, and I believe most of us are talking from our own perspectives when we say that they are indeed racist. And there have been times in history when some people haven't considered other people as real humans and yet they are called racists.

Another eidt. Forgive those horrible sentences I just constructed, I am tired and was in a hurry to play some NV.
User avatar
Isaac Saetern
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:46 pm

Post » Sat Jan 02, 2010 12:31 am

Edit, I misread.

That's still racist, and I believe most of us are talking fom their perspective when we say that they are indeed racist. And there have been times in history when other people haven't been considered as real humans and yet they are called racists.


Okay, does this mean that the Master was racist when he was trying to bring everyone back to being one 'race'?
User avatar
Erin S
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:06 pm

Post » Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:50 am

That's still racist, and I believe most of us are talking fom their perspective when we say that they are indeed racist. And there have been times in history when other people haven't been considered as real humans and yet they are called racists.


Mutants in Fallout 3 are a completely different species at this point. FEV (Forced Evolutionary Virus) doesn't just have the Evolutionary part in it for no reason.

If what your saying about mutations, variances in genetic structure and evolution in general is true, in regards to its relation to the status of a "race" of a species, then monkeys should be considered a "race" of humanity correct? (even though they are considered a seperate species) Its the exact same thing. Apes, monkeys and humans "branched off" from the same basic genetic construct. Mutants did the same but this was "Forced" by the FEV virus and radiation.

If apes are not a "race" of humanity then neither are mutants.

The Enclave are not "racists".
User avatar
Jonathan Windmon
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:23 pm

Post » Sat Jan 02, 2010 6:48 am

Guys the Enclave wants to kill all the mutants, ie, everyone including the wastelanders presuambly based entirely on genetic differences. It is a war of eugenics, does that still count as racism?

User avatar
Ezekiel Macallister
 
Posts: 3493
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:08 pm

Post » Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:20 pm

I don't think that they have to kill all the humans in the wasteland just super mutants, ghouls, deathclaw's, etc. But since the only way to be sure they are all gone is by genetically killing them i don't think there is much of a choice unless we can perfect the virus because even with the enclave tech killing all the supermutants, feral ghouls, and hostile wildlife would take at least a century and we could spend that century rebuilding.
User avatar
Jennifer Munroe
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:57 am

Post » Sat Jan 02, 2010 12:59 am

I don't think that they have to kill all the humans in the wasteland just super mutants, ghouls, deathclaw's, etc. But since the only way to be sure they are all gone is by genetically killing them i don't think there is much of a choice unless we can perfect the virus because even with the enclave tech killing all the supermutants, feral ghouls, and hostile wildlife would take at least a century and we could spend that century rebuilding.


Yes they do, the NCR and other wasteland governments won't just topple over to the Enclave's demands, it is also safeguarding the integrity of the Enclave's pure-status, which so many assume is just the Enclave equivelant of Ayranism. Real events such as Chernobyl and other nuclear disasters have produced horrific mutantions, particularly in those born after the disaster, and for those who may say that Fallout radiation doesn't work this way, yes it does, see the example of Vault City and how radiation caused chromosomal damage and fertility problems; imagine after a global nuclear war how bad things must be.
User avatar
christelle047
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:50 pm

Post » Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:39 am

Human or no, most of what the Enclave consider to be not human have cognative abilities damn near humans. Also, the Enclave also kill Vault Dwellers on a pretty common basis (see: Vault 13) which was what Fallout made pretty clear just how damn noble The Enclave is.
User avatar
Robert
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 5:58 am

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout Series Discussion