Real World Gun(s) you'd like to see in Future Fallouts Pt.2

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 8:49 am

FN FAL!

Also the ability to toggle safe-semi-and automatic fire modes.
Any rifle is better now. Any gun that has a fire selection would be awesome
User avatar
Sudah mati ini Keparat
 
Posts: 3605
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:14 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 2:36 am

I stick with real weapons cant stand the energy weapons one bit. I hate the missle launcher too. Would rather have a AT4 to replace the missle launchers. AT4 is an 84-mm unguided, portable, single-shot recoilless smoothbore weapon. Sights Iron or optional night vision unit too. Its a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-tank_weapon start build late 1960.
There are several different types too:

HEDP 502 (High Explosive Dual Purpose) For use against http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bunker, buildings, enemy personnel in the open and light armor. The projectile can be set to detonate on impact or with a slight delayed detonation. The heavier nose cap allows the HEDP projectile to penetrate light walls or windows and then explode, or "skipped" off the ground for an air-burst. For use against light armor, there is a smaller cone HEAT warhead with 150 mm (5.9 inches) of penetration against RHA

HP (High Penetration) Extra high penetration ability (up to 500 mm (19.7 inches) to 600 mm (23.6 inches) of RHA.)

AST (Anti Structure Tandem-warheads) Designed for urban warfare where a projectile heavier than the HEDP AT4 is needed. Two warheads, first one a HEAT with a shallow cone resulting in less penetration but a wider hole, and a second follow through high-blast warhead. It has two settings: one for destroying bunkers and one for mouse holing a building wall for combat entry.

HEAT (High Explosive Anti-Tank)
The AT4 HEAT can penetrate up to 420 mm (16.5 inches) of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolled_homogeneous_armour with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beyond-armour_effect. AT8 (Bunker Busting) A version of the AT4 where the standard HEAT projectile is replaced with the bunker busting warhead developed for the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon. No orders placed.

AT12 (130mm Frontal Engagement Version)
In the early 1990s, there were tests of a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tandem_charge 130-mm version (Bofors AT 12) that would be able to penetrate the front armor of any modern main battle tank. However, the project was canceled due to the dissolution of the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Union and cuts in Western defense budgets.

Instead of being about to carry a missle launcher with multiple missles Sorry not possible, You can carry only one AT4 at a time once fired its worthless and dropped.
User avatar
Jennie Skeletons
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 8:21 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 7:23 pm

I stick with real weapons cant stand the energy weapons one bit. I hate the missle launcher too. Would rather have a AT4 to replace the missle launchers. AT4 is an 84-mm unguided, portable, single-shot recoilless smoothbore weapon. Sights Iron or optional night vision unit too. Its a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-tank_weapon start build late 1960.
There are several different types too: HEDP 502 (High Explosive Dual Purpose) For use against http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bunker, buildings, enemy personnel in the open and light armor. The projectile can be set to detonate on impact or with a slight delayed detonation. The heavier nose cap allows the HEDP projectile to penetrate light walls or windows and then explode, or "skipped" off the ground for an air-burst. For use against light armor, there is a smaller cone HEAT warhead with 150 mm (5.9 inches) of penetration against RHA HP (High Penetration) Extra high penetration ability (up to 500 mm (19.7 inches) to 600 mm (23.6 inches) of RHA.) AST (Anti Structure Tandem-warheads) Designed for urban warfare where a projectile heavier than the HEDP AT4 is needed. Two warheads, first one a HEAT with a shallow cone resulting in less penetration but a wider hole, and a second follow through high-blast warhead. It has two settings: one for destroying bunkers and one for mouse holing a building wall for combat entry. HEAT (High Explosive Anti-Tank) The AT4 HEAT can penetrate up to 420 mm (16.5 inches) of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolled_homogeneous_armour with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beyond-armour_effect. AT8 (Bunker Busting) A version of the AT4 where the standard HEAT projectile is replaced with the bunker busting warhead developed for the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon. No orders placed. AT12 (130mm Frontal Engagement Version) In the early 1990s, there were tests of a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tandem_charge 130-mm version (Bofors AT 12) that would be able to penetrate the front armor of any modern main battle tank. However, the project was canceled due to the dissolution of the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Union and cuts in Western defense budgets. Instead of being about to carry a missle launcher with multiple missles Sorry not possible, You can carry only one AT4 at a time once fired its worthless and dropped.
Thats a good idea but hard to program on their software.
User avatar
Kira! :)))
 
Posts: 3496
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:07 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 2:31 am

Thats a good idea but hard to program on their software.
Well they could just have one type, since they dont have bunkers or being able to destory a building yet. Just make the AT4 like the AST (Anti Structure Tandem-warheads) Designed for urban warfare. And just make it so when fired the missle will just do what it already does in the game, but at least make it 25% stronger. So if I fire it at a deathclaw it will kill it or if fired at a group of enemies comeing at me but still a good ways away it will kill everyone with in a 100 foot radius of the detonation.
User avatar
Adrian Powers
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:44 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 4:51 am


Well they could just have one type, since they dont have bunkers or being able to destory a building yet. Just make the AT4 like the AST (Anti Structure Tandem-warheads) Designed for urban warfare. And just make it so when fired the missle will just do what it already does in the game, but at least make it 25% stronger. So if I fire it at a deathclaw it will kill it or if fired at a group of enemies comeing at me but still a good ways away it will kill everyone with in a 100 foot radius of the detonation.
Thats why there's fatman!!!
User avatar
Nicole Kraus
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:34 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 5:36 am

Thats why there's fatman!!!
There is the fatman, forgot about that one. I never uses it. Setting off a mini nuke sorry to say would and should kill you too unless you where up on a tall mountain and fired it at a camp or group of enemies miles away still...
User avatar
Nick Pryce
 
Posts: 3386
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 8:36 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 9:48 pm


There is the fatman, forgot about that one. I never uses it. Setting off a mini nuke sorry to say would and should kill you too unless you where up on a tall mountain and fired it at a camp or group of enemies miles away still...
I understand that. Well thats why i was glad in the Gun Runners Arsenal we got the Esther. It deffinantly protected more than normal.
User avatar
Katharine Newton
 
Posts: 3318
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:33 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 6:52 am

I say M16, M4, AK-47, AK-74U, ect. a long with other generic guns that are in use today. Why not make it interesting and put in a musket as a start off gun? I also think that a great idea would be to make it so you can customize a gun. I find it that I need a gun for each encounter. Why not make it so the player only needs one gun multiple
encounters. Also when using the iron sights the front sight is not very usable...like in the service rifle...
User avatar
matt oneil
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 12:54 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 6:04 am

A gun I'd like to see is the old Winchester Model 1905 blow-back rifle (which I just so happen to have "inherited" one). Then we could have a rifle that would actually be chambered in the .32 caliber cartridge (if it's brought back, if not then .35 WSL would do,) and this time not make it so damn WEAK. At the very least, it could have been more powerful than the 5.56 cartridge. :stare:


I agree fully I have one to and it is a great gun!
User avatar
Johanna Van Drunick
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 11:40 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 6:54 am

http://static.ddmcdn.com/gif/screwdriver-1.jpg

Didn't see that coming.
User avatar
Farrah Lee
 
Posts: 3488
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:32 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 2:52 am

http://static.ddmcdn.com/gif/screwdriver-1.jpg

Didn't see that coming.
:biggrin:
User avatar
sharon
 
Posts: 3449
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 4:59 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 3:40 am

How bout a bullpup rifle( this is like the third time i said it but noone reckonizes it). Any of them would do i just want something different then the conventional style gas systems
User avatar
Kelvin Diaz
 
Posts: 3214
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 5:16 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 7:39 pm

I stick with real weapons cant stand the energy weapons one bit. I hate the missle launcher too. Would rather have a AT4 to replace the missle launchers. AT4 is an 84-mm unguided, portable, single-shot recoilless smoothbore weapon. Sights Iron or optional night vision unit too. Its a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-tank_weapon start build late 1960.
There are several different types too:

HEDP 502 (High Explosive Dual Purpose) For use against http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bunker, buildings, enemy personnel in the open and light armor. The projectile can be set to detonate on impact or with a slight delayed detonation. The heavier nose cap allows the HEDP projectile to penetrate light walls or windows and then explode, or "skipped" off the ground for an air-burst. For use against light armor, there is a smaller cone HEAT warhead with 150 mm (5.9 inches) of penetration against RHA

HP (High Penetration) Extra high penetration ability (up to 500 mm (19.7 inches) to 600 mm (23.6 inches) of RHA.)

AST (Anti Structure Tandem-warheads) Designed for urban warfare where a projectile heavier than the HEDP AT4 is needed. Two warheads, first one a HEAT with a shallow cone resulting in less penetration but a wider hole, and a second follow through high-blast warhead. It has two settings: one for destroying bunkers and one for mouse holing a building wall for combat entry.

HEAT (High Explosive Anti-Tank)
The AT4 HEAT can penetrate up to 420 mm (16.5 inches) of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolled_homogeneous_armour with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beyond-armour_effect. AT8 (Bunker Busting) A version of the AT4 where the standard HEAT projectile is replaced with the bunker busting warhead developed for the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon. No orders placed.

AT12 (130mm Frontal Engagement Version)
In the early 1990s, there were tests of a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tandem_charge 130-mm version (Bofors AT 12) that would be able to penetrate the front armor of any modern main battle tank. However, the project was canceled due to the dissolution of the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Union and cuts in Western defense budgets.

Instead of being about to carry a missle launcher with multiple missles Sorry not possible, You can carry only one AT4 at a time once fired its worthless and dropped.

Well... Most people wouldn't probably no te difference and if it can blow [censored] up, they dot care.
User avatar
Leilene Nessel
 
Posts: 3428
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 2:11 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 5:46 pm



Well... Most people wouldn't probably no te difference and if it can blow [censored] up, they dot care.
Well i also think its pointless because if ita one shot (like its sipposed to) it would be too costly
User avatar
Sandeep Khatkar
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:02 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 3:37 am

How bout a bullpup rifle( this is like the third time i said it but noone reckonizes it). Any of them would do i just want something different then the conventional style gas systems
They could add the XL70E3 back if they wanted and make it much more useful.
User avatar
JESSE
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:55 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 11:19 pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colt_Lightning_Carbine, would be a cool addition. They could even chamber it in .357 Magnum/.38 Special, like the modern reproductions. Or .44-40.
User avatar
Josephine Gowing
 
Posts: 3545
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 12:41 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 11:28 pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colt_Lightning_Carbine, would be a cool addition. They could even chamber it in .357 Magnum/.38 Special, like the modern reproductions. Or .44-40.
Thats a wonderful weapon i agree
User avatar
Jonny
 
Posts: 3508
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:04 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 9:13 pm

There is the fatman, forgot about that one. I never uses it. Setting off a mini nuke sorry to say would and should kill you too unless you where up on a tall mountain and fired it at a camp or group of enemies miles away still...

And you should't be able to technically see the laser of laser guns, yet there they are. Fallout isn't meant to be ultra-realistic, that's why there's weapons like the Fat-man, laser guns that shoot visible lasers, and you can carry 100 missiles for your missile launcher, etc.
User avatar
Ryan Lutz
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:39 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 9:54 pm



And you should't be able to technically see the laser of laser guns, yet there they are. Fallout isn't meant to be ultra-realistic, that's why there's weapons like the Fat-man, laser guns that shoot visible lasers, and you can carry 100 missiles for your missile launcher, etc.

Agreed.
User avatar
bimsy
 
Posts: 3541
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:04 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 9:30 pm

I want different types of guns for each ammo type like with 7.62x39 we could have an fal, ak47, and an unique ersion of eithor or each. Giving us more freedom in gun choosing. Plus with the same ammo there's a lmg.

OT: i want more freedom with modifications to my guns. If i want to have a silencer and no scope on a .50cal rifle then i should have it. If i want to color a gun blue and white stripped on a pistol Give it to me.
User avatar
Portions
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:47 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 3:30 am

I want different types of guns for each ammo type like with 7.62x39 we could have an fal, ak47, and an unique ersion of eithor or each. Giving us more freedom in gun choosing. Plus with the same ammo there's a lmg.

OT: i want more freedom with modifications to my guns. If i want to have a silencer and no scope on a .50cal rifle then i should have it. If i want to color a gun blue and white stripped on a pistol Give it to me.
Doesn't the FAL use NATO rounds? If they add more ammo types I think the first dimension is all we need, so just 7.62.
User avatar
Darrell Fawcett
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 12:16 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 9:20 pm

Doesn't the FAL use NATO rounds? If they add more ammo types I think the first dimension is all we need, so just 7.62.
It could but the first ones had 7.62 i think ,dont quote me on tis, but there are variations that are chambered for both but yes it does use NATO but mine is chamber for 7.62 because i like larger wholes in my targets.
User avatar
K J S
 
Posts: 3326
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 11:50 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 7:12 am

It could but the first ones had 7.62 i think ,dont quote me on tis, but there are variations that are chambered for both but yes it does use NATO but mine is chamber for 7.62 because i like larger wholes in my targets.

7.62, is just the bullet diameter. In the US, 7.62mm, equates to the known .30 caliber. Cartridges like .30-30, .30-06, all have a 7.62mm diameter bullet. FN FAL's are chambered in 7.62x51 NATO (the NATO designation just shows it's meant for NATO), or in America as it's know in civilian use, .308 Winchester. If we got a FN FAL, they'd just chamber it in .308 like it should be.
User avatar
Chris Johnston
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 12:40 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 3:01 am



7.62, is just the bullet diameter. In the US, 7.62mm, equates to the known .30 caliber. Cartridges like .30-30, .30-06, all have a 7.62mm diameter bullet. FN FAL's are chambered in 7.62x51 NATO (the NATO designation just shows it's meant for NATO), or in America as it's know in civilian use, .308 Winchester. If we got a FN FAL, they'd just chamber it in .308 like it should be.
See when he said NATO i automaticly thought the 5.56 round. My misunderstanding.

And yeah they would most likely say its .308 and i would like to have a gun in .338 lapua
User avatar
Lewis Morel
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:40 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 10:45 pm

M240b with box clip.

M1911- different colors and tints and materials. Like, I like the wooden grip, but you can have a stylish grey as seen nowadays.
User avatar
Laura Ellaby
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 9:59 am

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout Series Discussion