Remember when Todd said DLC will feel like expansi

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 8:32 am

Remember when Todd said DLC will feel like expansions? Kotaku remembers. It is referenced and questioned in this fairly written article, though it is not the main focus of it. http://kotaku.com/farewell-skyrim-473572396

So where is the DLC that feels like an expansion? Dragonborn could possibly fit that, but only barely, and it is only one. Todd spoke of multiple. I will never believe a thing that comes out of his mouth after the lies before the game's release, and afterward.

Bethesda not doing any more DLC seems unfinished somehow. I never did get what I was hoping for from Skyrim. It is one of my favorite games of all time, but I feel disappointed. I think it might be because it is all a cold climate. I was hoping to go somewhere warm and different. Even Solstheim felt largely the same as Skyrim.

Anyway, the game is still amazing. I guess I am just a little disappointed, but that won't stop me from buying TES VI - though I may wait for it to come down in price as opposed to my traditional pre-orders. I think DLC is important with a game like this. A vanilla release only sets up the foundation for all that the game has potential for. The DLC can really make it shine, but Bethesda failed here (Dragonborn aside). Dawnguard and especially Hearthfire did not do enough to add to the incredible experience of Skyrim. I guess it is up to modders now, but even after all this time I see nothing that really catches my eye there.

Just my opinion. What do you guys think?
User avatar
mimi_lys
 
Posts: 3514
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 11:17 am

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:27 am

Dawnguard, contrary to popular belief, was pretty big as far as DLC goes.
User avatar
Undisclosed Desires
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:10 pm

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 12:36 pm

Dawnguard, contrary to popular belief, was pretty big as far as DLC goes.
Hearthfire looks good
User avatar
J.P loves
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 9:03 am

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 1:10 pm

Dawnguard, contrary to popular belief, was pretty big as far as DLC goes.
Yes as big as it was but it didn't feel as an expansion pack at all.

Didn't people learn by now not to trust anything that Todd or Bethesda say? :tongue:

Personally, i'll be taking any news they have on VI or any of their games with a grain of salt from now on.
User avatar
Nicola
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:57 am

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 8:42 pm

Dawnguard, contrary to popular belief, was pretty big as far as DLC goes.

Yeah it was.

People just want the team to put outragouse amount of work into DLC.
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:58 pm

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 5:58 am

Dawnguard, contrary to popular belief, was pretty big as far as DLC goes.

Wha? Dawnguard was nowhere near being an expansion. It added a quest.

Hearthfire looks good

And you surely can't be saying that Hearthfire was expansion worthy, are you?? :blink:


And no, I am not one of the ones that want more DLC. I'm quite happy they are onto the next project. :)
User avatar
lauraa
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:20 pm

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:44 pm

Wha? Dawnguard was nowhere near being an expansion. It added a quest.



And you surely can't be saying that Hearthfire was expansion worthy, are you?? :blink:


And no, I am not one of the ones that want more DLC. I'm quite happy they are onto the next project. :smile:
Don't know, dont have DLC yet
User avatar
Enie van Bied
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 11:47 pm

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 5:33 pm

Anyone who says Dawnguard or Hearthfire is like an expansion needs to go back and play Baldur's Gate and learn what a REAL expansion is. Or Tribunal or Shjivering Isles for that matter.
User avatar
Melanie Steinberg
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:25 pm

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 5:03 pm

Dawnguard was quantifiably larger than Tribunal and Knights of the Nine. Shocking, I know. At most, it's about the same size of Tribunal.

I'm not saying it's better, but it is large.
User avatar
casey macmillan
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:37 pm

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 11:26 am

Don't know, dont have DLC yet

Ahhh, I understand now. Well in the context you seemed to be saying that maybe Hearthfire was comparable to an expansion.. Which it really isn't. I'm sure it's a nice addition to the game, especially for console users. But it's nowhere near being considered an expansion.

But yeah, it looks neat. I bought it a couple months ago and still haven't done anything with it. :P
User avatar
Sanctum
 
Posts: 3524
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 8:29 am

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 1:55 pm

Anyone who says Dawnguard or Hearthfire is like an expansion needs to go back and play Baldur's Gate and learn what a REAL expansion is. Or Tribunal or Shjivering Isles for that matter.
Dawnguard was quantifiably larger than Tribunal and Knights of the Nine. Shocking, I know.

Someone just got burned.
User avatar
Alexx Peace
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 5:55 pm

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 5:54 am

Dawnguard was quantifiably larger than Tribunal and Knights of the Nine. Shocking, I know. At most, it's about the same size of Tribunal.

I'm not saying it's better, but it is large.

You know you're going to have to back that up, right? Knights of the Nine? Sure. But Tribunal?!?! Are you mad?
User avatar
Your Mum
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 6:23 pm

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 5:33 pm

Someone just got burned.

I'm not sure this really makes any sense. Giving opinion is a burn now?

I agree that Dawnguard adds more than Knights of the Nine, but I wouldn't classify Knights of the Nine as an expansion either.


Almost forgot... Oooooh burn! :bonk:
User avatar
James Smart
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:49 pm

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:44 pm

Someone just got burned.

Cool story.
User avatar
Kat Lehmann
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 6:24 am

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:48 pm

I will never believe a thing that comes out of his mouth after the lies before the game's release, and afterward.

Just my opinion. What do you guys think?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ne1fVhvL00
User avatar
Karine laverre
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:50 am

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:12 pm

I'm not sure this really makes any sense. Giving opinion is a burn now?

I agree that Dawnguard adds more than Knights of the Nine, but I wouldn't classify Knights of the Nine as an expansion either.


Almost forgot... Oooooh burn! :bonk:

If their not an expansion then what are they?

The only expansion you guys will accept is an entire game.
User avatar
michael danso
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 9:21 am

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 12:34 pm

You know you're going to have to back that up, right? Knights of the Nine? Sure. But Tribunal?!?! Are you mad?

Nope. I think Tribunal was better, but they added generally about the same amount of things. Their file sizes were about the same size, I know that for a fact.

Especially in today's standard, Dawnguard is pretty close to expansion pack. It was over 5 times larger than Knights of the Nine.
User avatar
gary lee
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:49 pm

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 5:56 am

Well, after I read through this: http://kotaku.com/5885983/bethesda-skyrim-dlc-will-feel-more-like-expansion-packs

I conclude that nothing Todd Howard said or implied there has turned out to be false. He said that Skyrim DLC will, in comparison with Fallout 3's DLC, have "more meat on them" and will "feel closer to an expansion pack". That's true; you might have wanted DG/DB to be bigger, but that doesn't make what Todd said false.

Todd also said that they want to release little things for free in between the larger DLC. That has turned out to be true, with numerous free patches including new features.

Todd also said that they were somewhat unsure of exactly how they were going to support the game post-release, and were relying on feedback from people who play Skyrim. And it certainly feels that way in a lot of the patches. They've fixed bugs (unfortunately, not all of them, and even then not flawlessly), but they've resisted balancing certain "exploits" because these exploits allow for greater character customisation.

Really, my conclusion is that the OP is disappointed that there will be no new Skyrim DLC. But OP is wrong to suggest that Bethesda has at any time said or implied that they were going to deliver more than they in fact have.
User avatar
Skrapp Stephens
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 5:04 am

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 2:04 pm

If their not an expansion then what are they?

The only expansion you guys will accept is an entire game.

They are DLC. You are obviously too young to know what real expansions are.
User avatar
Killah Bee
 
Posts: 3484
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 12:23 pm

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 5:24 pm

Nope. I think Tribunal was better, but they added generally about the same amount of things. Their file sizes were about the same size, I know that for a fact.

Especially in today's standard, Dawnguard is pretty close to expansion pack. It was over 5 times larger than Knights of the Nine.

The file size has nothing to do with it. The resolution of textures, and quality of audio alone accounts for the disparity.

Tribunal added a huge new city (bigger than all cities in Skyrim put together), plus an amazing underground labyrinth, new armor, weapons, items, decor, textures, quests, etc. Dawnguard had you prancing around the vanilla game with very little original things added.
User avatar
Michelle Serenity Boss
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 10:49 am

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:38 pm

Yeah it was.

People just want the team to put outragouse amount of work into DLC.
Honestly, it's crazy reading these posts about people wanting to visit a whole new province or some other ridiculous things for DLC. Even reading through the patch suggestions, people are asking for things like entirely new factions. It's ridiculous.
User avatar
CORY
 
Posts: 3335
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 9:54 pm

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 8:54 pm

Well, after I read through this: http://kotaku.com/5885983/bethesda-skyrim-dlc-will-feel-more-like-expansion-packs

I conclude that nothing Todd Howard said or implied there has turned out to be false. He said that Skyrim DLC will, in comparison with Fallout 3's DLC, have "more meat on them" and will "feel closer to an expansion pack". That's true; you might have wanted DG/DB to be bigger, but that doesn't make what Todd said false.

Todd also said that they want to release little things for free in between the larger DLC. That has turned out to be true, with numerous free patches including new features.

Todd also said that they were somewhat unsure of exactly how they were going to support the game post-release, and were relying on feedback from people who play Skyrim. And it certainly feels that way in a lot of the patches. They've fixed bugs (unfortunately, not all of them, and even then not flawlessly), but they've resisted balancing certain "exploits" because these exploits allow for greater character customisation.

Really, my conclusion is that the OP is disappointed that there will be no new Skyrim DLC. But OP is wrong to suggest that Bethesda has at any time said or implied that they were going to deliver more than they in fact have.

I disagree with you on a lot of that, but thank you for making your point intelligently and maturely. Cheers.
User avatar
Wane Peters
 
Posts: 3359
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 9:34 pm

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:12 pm

Rather subjective. Personally I feel like Dawnguard and Dragonborn were expansions.

Tribunal added a huge new city (bigger than all cities in Skyrim put together), plus an amazing underground labyrinth, new armor, weapons, items, decor, textures, quests, etc. Dawnguard had you prancing around the vanilla game with very little original things added.
Someone needs to take off their nostalgia goggles. Mournhold was fairly small. Large by Morrowind standards, and perhaps larger then and single city in Skyrim, but not nearly larger then all of them together.
User avatar
Johnny
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:32 am

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 8:31 pm

Just my opinion. What do you guys think?

As I recall they promised 3 expansion size DLC, and hinted it would be larger than any expansions they had done previously
Add to it all the rumors of province size expansions early after release, supported by videos showing gateway to other provinces
-
I think it was just publicity stunts gone wrong
-
But can we hold them against them ? At least there was no horse armors
Maybe Bethesda really thought they could pull of province size expansions, then changed their mind ?
Or maybe it's just greed and they want 60$ for it.
-
It's also possible they developed new technology that allow larger cities and landscape
who knows ?
-
So, anyway, I was more satisfied with Skyrim than with previous titles
-
One issue I had with Skyrim was the non existant awfull user interface
They put less than 10 seconds of efforts on that interface
-
Then there is Peter Hines claiming they can't do multiple provinces
Yet Elder Scrolls Online is delivering all of Tamriel to your doorstep
And of course MMO are harder to pull off because you need connectivity, transaction, chat, reliability, client-server, play-balance ...
So he was stretching the truth ... a lot !!!
-
*Dawnguard, contrary to popular belief, was pretty big as far as DLC goes. *
that thing was 20$ while Skyrim started at 60$. Do the maths.
-
*People just want the team to put outragouse amount of work into DLC.*
sorry but Skyrim made over half a billion $ in profit within a short time after release
And that money didn't go in the development team pockets
the more DLCs they do, the larger the DLCs,
the more those peoples in the Skyrim team get rewarded for their efforts
Of course it's also a way to give back to peoples who paid for the game
(as opposed to hackers who didn't pay)
-
Anyway, for me I was verry disapointed when I saw the news
But then a new game is an opportunity to improve the game mechanics
User avatar
Ellie English
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:47 pm

Post » Wed Apr 17, 2013 12:58 pm

The file size has nothing to do with it. The resolution of textures, and quality of audio alone accounts for the disparity.

Tribunal added a huge new city (bigger than all cities in Skyrim put together), plus an amazing underground labyrinth, new armor, weapons, items, decor, textures, quests, etc. Dawnguard had you prancing around the vanilla game with very little original things added.

Dawnguard added 2 fortresses, the Forgotten Vale, over a handful of new dungeons, 2 new perk trees, a handful of new armour sets (with different variants), a few new spells, a handful of new artifacts, a few new summons (including a mount), a few new shouts.

I am not in the mood to defend Skyrim DLC right now, but I feel it has to be done. Dawnguard was big.

Edit: also Mournhold was definitely not that large.
User avatar
Margarita Diaz
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 2:01 pm

Next

Return to V - Skyrim