Resistance vs Security 6

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:53 am

Continue the endless debate Go!
User avatar
katsomaya Sanchez
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:03 am

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 9:37 am

maybe the debate has ended... oh wait do you here that! here they come
User avatar
Your Mum
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 6:23 pm

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 5:25 am

(Troll)
Security are right to put all the resistance down. The Ark started off theirs, and it's going to stay theirs.
(/Troll)
User avatar
Maya Maya
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:35 pm

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 6:30 am

(Troll)
Security are right to put all the resistance down. The Ark started off theirs, and it's going to stay theirs.
(/Troll)


:flame: ...DIIIEEE!!! :swear: :toughninja: :gun:
User avatar
Matthew Barrows
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 11:24 pm

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 6:07 am

[Troll]

The Resistance are totally in the right. What you're entitled to is based on what you need.

[/troll]
User avatar
Ian White
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:08 pm

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 5:51 am

/supertroll

(Truth)
Security are right to put all the resistance down. The Ark started off theirs, and it's going to stay theirs.
(/Truth)


/endsupertroll
User avatar
NeverStopThe
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 11:25 pm

Post » Sat Jan 01, 2011 10:55 pm

The true struggle on the Ark

Security has all the water...

but the Resistance has all the drinking glasses...

The Bio weapon is a glowing water cooler!!!

Bobby Boucher is the final boss battle

[// end of unfounded speculation.. ]
User avatar
Lizbeth Ruiz
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:35 pm

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 3:31 am

[troll]

Security. The people with the most money and power should be higher on the priority list. After all, they were here first.

[/troll]
User avatar
Christie Mitchell
 
Posts: 3389
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 10:44 pm

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:54 pm

I always have a soft spot in my heart for grimy ragtag militant freedom-fighter rebels going toe-to-toe with an oppressive, brutal, uniformed, and "just following orders" occupying force.
User avatar
ruCkii
 
Posts: 3360
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 9:08 pm

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:00 pm

I always have a soft spot in my heart for grimy ragtag militant freedom-fighter rebels going toe-to-toe with an oppressive, brutal, uniformed, and "just following orders" occupying force.


Che Guevara.... la la la. How many innocent people did he kill again?
User avatar
Tyrel
 
Posts: 3304
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:52 am

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 10:39 am

[troll]

Security. The people with the most money and power should be higher on the priority list. After all, they were here first.

[/troll]



More or less. My house is my house whether you're starving or not...
User avatar
Catherine Harte
 
Posts: 3379
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 12:58 pm

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 10:27 am

More or less. My house is my house whether you're starving or not...

So because you were there first means you get way more room, all the food, and your own army, and the new guys have to do all your work, live 2 feet away from each other, and eat whatever they can find? Sounds like dictatorship to me, Resistance are well within their right to be pissed off.
User avatar
Trent Theriot
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 3:37 am

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 4:37 am

But you can still share. The Security are sharing, they're just not good at it yet.


Also, watch District 9. Then read Brink's story. Then hope the Resistance don't get lasers.
User avatar
Alycia Leann grace
 
Posts: 3539
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:07 pm

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 11:21 am

Unfair distribution of resources, cramped living spaces and grimy streets lined with trash, Random security checks involving doors being kicked down in the night...
Sounds great! :biggrin:
By the way if you havent guessed, I AM THE RESISTANCE
Vive la Resistance! :rock:
User avatar
Sammykins
 
Posts: 3330
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:48 am

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 7:18 am

I always have a soft spot in my heart for grimy ragtag militant freedom-fighter rebels going toe-to-toe with an oppressive, brutal, uniformed, and "just following orders" occupying force.


Agreed. The real arguement is that teh founders were here first (Hence the name FOUNDERS duh) and even though it was a fallback in the case of a crisis they didnt expect so much. so now the Resistance keep teh ark afloat but have poor housing water and food (im still wondering wah they do for bathrooms) so they want to "Free" the ark by contacting land and having even water distubution while teh Security wants to keep everything the same way and just let it play out.
User avatar
jesse villaneda
 
Posts: 3359
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:37 pm

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 10:35 am

Che Guevara.... la la la. How many innocent people did he kill again?

The path to revolution is seldom without blood. Even a relatively harmless overthrow (by this I mean Egypt's recent protests) saw some people get beaten, and others died. Not as much as other rebellions and revolutions, to be sure. But in Brink's case, I'll bet that Security forces are as innocent as the Nazi soldiers who "were just following orders".

Agreed. The real arguement is that teh founders were here first (Hence the name FOUNDERS duh) and even though it was a fallback in the case of a crisis they didnt expect so much. so now the Resistance keep teh ark afloat but have poor housing water and food (im still wondering wah they do for bathrooms) so they want to "Free" the ark by contacting land and having even water distubution while teh Security wants to keep everything the same way and just let it play out.

There is a hidden hand behind the Security forces who knows more than he's telling the Ark's populace about contacting the mainland. The Security forces are being used to protect that hand and hide the truth. The Resistance wants to--and deserves to--know the truth. I'm behind them 110%. The fact that the Security forces are being cooperative with that hand instead of asking "Yeah, why haven't we heard anything about the mainland?" makes them guilty by accessory. I won't feel guilty when I off 'em.
User avatar
Chica Cheve
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 10:42 pm

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:30 pm

There is a hidden hand behind the Security forces who knows more than he's telling the Ark's populace about contacting the mainland. The Security forces are being used to protect that hand and hide the truth. The Resistance wants to--and deserves to--know the truth. I'm behind them 110%. The fact that the Security forces are being cooperative with that hand instead of asking "Yeah, why haven't we heard anything about the mainland?" makes them guilty by accessory. I won't feel guilty when I off 'em.


The security are only partly guilty. They may have been tricked (or brainwashed :drool: ) into protecting the hand. (if their is one) Other wise the security are following orders from teh founder'S (plural) because thay have been tricked that the Resistance Wants to kill them and rule the ark. My saying is: Every war could have been soleved with 2 things: 1) a high powered sniper rifle or 2) sitting down and laying out why these two things are going to war and then both would realize "OH crap all you wanted was some sugar?"
User avatar
Lady Shocka
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:59 pm

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 3:58 am

The security are only partly guilty. They may have been tricked (or brainwashed :drool: ) into protecting the hand. (if their is one) Other wise the security are following orders from teh founder'S (plural) because thay have been tricked that the Resistance Wants to kill them and rule the ark. My saying is: Every war could have been soleved with 2 things: 1) a high powered sniper rifle or 2) sitting down and laying out why these two things are going to war and then both would realize "OH crap all you wanted was some sugar?"


''Yeah, just sugar''
''Okay, here you g-''
''HOLY [censored] RESISTANCE SCUMS AHEAD''
*bam bam bam*

BRINK 2 announced
User avatar
Emma Louise Adams
 
Posts: 3527
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:15 pm

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 5:29 am

Agreed. The real arguement is that teh founders were here first (Hence the name FOUNDERS duh) and even though it was a fallback in the case of a crisis they didnt expect so much. so now the Resistance keep teh ark afloat but have poor housing water and food (im still wondering wah they do for bathrooms) so they want to "Free" the ark by contacting land and having even water distubution while teh Security wants to keep everything the same way and just let it play out.



The path to revolution is seldom without blood. Even a relatively harmless overthrow (by this I mean Egypt's recent protests) saw some people get beaten, and others died. Not as much as other rebellions and revolutions, to be sure. But in Brink's case, I'll bet that Security forces are as innocent as the Nazi soldiers who "were just following orders".


There is a hidden hand behind the Security forces who knows more than he's telling the Ark's populace about contacting the mainland. The Security forces are being used to protect that hand and hide the truth. The Resistance wants to--and deserves to--know the truth. I'm behind them 110%. The fact that the Security forces are being cooperative with that hand instead of asking "Yeah, why haven't we heard anything about the mainland?" makes them guilty by accessory. I won't feel guilty when I off 'em.



The security are only partly guilty. They may have been tricked (or brainwashed :drool: ) into protecting the hand. (if their is one) Other wise the security are following orders from teh founder'S (plural) because thay have been tricked that the Resistance Wants to kill them and rule the ark. My saying is: Every war could have been soleved with 2 things: 1) a high powered sniper rifle or 2) sitting down and laying out why these two things are going to war and then both would realize "OH crap all you wanted was some sugar?"


You guys do know that there is no bad guy here. If anything its the Resistances fault in the first place,
User avatar
john palmer
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 8:07 pm

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 3:58 am

Before the war everything flowed, sorta, all were getting rations, nobody died in vain

Then something sparked, and someone tossed a stone

Then the war started, and people died

Who tossed the stone?
User avatar
evelina c
 
Posts: 3377
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 4:28 pm

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 9:20 am

You guys do know that there is no bad guy here. If anything its the Resistances fault in the first place,


I know their is no bad guy their both fighting for what they believe is right. Its not teh resistance fault. and when their is a giant flood and you come onto the ark im going to shove you off teh side right back into your lil boat. haha. but then agian the Resistance are trying to help everybody by getting OFF The ark. what i dont get is why doesnt teh resistance walk up to the Foounders. say: "can you see if their are any people out their because were all cramped and maybe we can begin civilization." and the nteh founders be like "Sure" goes to radio and broad casts message either 1) yes theirs people! they have land and we can all finally live in peace or 2) no their is none out their. but then again tehy could lie for some devious plot...
User avatar
Izzy Coleman
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 3:34 am

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 6:28 am

I know their is no bad guy their both fighting for what they believe is right. Its not teh resistance fault. and when their is a giant flood and you come onto the ark im going to shove you off teh side right back into your lil boat. haha. but then agian the Resistance are trying to help everybody by getting OFF The ark. what i dont get is why doesnt teh resistance walk up to the Foounders. say: "can you see if their are any people out their because were all cramped and maybe we can begin civilization." and the nteh founders be like "Sure" goes to radio and broad casts message either 1) yes theirs people! they have land and we can all finally live in peace or 2) no their is none out their. but then again tehy could lie for some devious plot...


There has been no radio contact for 10 years, Yes the Ark is overcrowded now but trying to leave would waste even more resources with no hope of success,
User avatar
Jeff Tingler
 
Posts: 3609
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 7:55 pm

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 5:15 am

There has been no radio contact for 10 years, Yes the Ark is overcrowded now but trying to leave would waste even more resources with no hope of success,


1) can you pleaasse tell me where you have read no radio contact? and its a Catch 22. Use what little resources they have and try to find land or sty the way they are and let their resources diminish... i believe this the real story.
User avatar
Shannon Lockwood
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:38 pm

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 7:15 am

1) can you pleaasse tell me where you have read no radio contact? and its a Catch 22. Use what little resources they have and try to find land or sty the way they are and let their resources diminish... i believe this the real story.


I love when I tell someone something they don't know about Brink they always question it,.
User avatar
TOYA toys
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 4:22 am

Post » Sun Jan 02, 2011 5:43 am

Well take this into considerationg: what f their is radio contact and the founders srnt telling us? and Wraith i think we should put this to rest. we'll find out for when the game comes out, and tehn we can start this ack up :goodjob:
User avatar
Marta Wolko
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 6:51 am

Next

Return to Othor Games